Posted on 06/16/2002 12:55:18 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:06:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
June 16, 2002 -- The Jewish Defense Group - which says it wants to protect its neighborhood even as critics call them vigilantes looking to inflame tensions - will hit the streets today with its controversial armed patrols.
Leaders of the group last week raised the hackles of cops and other city leaders by vowing to patrol Jewish neighborhoods such as Borough Park and Flatbush.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
And it proves what besides your prosecutorial evil on Jews?
I see that your cowardice in upholding the laws of this nation may try to hide itself behind this blame of the Jew thing. Hitler too purported to rebuild the nation by supporting its looting or by disinteresting the people in the Holocaust as you are doing - while you blame Jews for disinteresting people on the "other holocaust".
You mean the one that applies to Congress?
Or is there one that applies to New York?
I do not like trying to explain things because I fall into complex modelings that are not really right. But attempting to model without modeling can lead one to separate all models in the end from reality. So exposing models fills the spaces of lies that hopefuly will reveal the location of truth.
According to the Bible, the perfect genes lay in the tree. According to many naturalists, plants are perfect. Both religious and non- religous people agree on that ecosystem truth. Animals and people are consumers of those plants and trees. They are ravenous consumers, and it is in their genes to consume each other, even consuming the strong emotions, models and ideologies that come with it.
When meditating away from consumption, and blocking consumption out, one can start seeing that there is something other than consumption that makes us superior to animals - there is something other than physics. The understanding that we need to respect the tree first and foremost is a great clue as to what this spiritual world is all about. The second clue is that though we are potentialy invadors of the tree, our existence is still needed, if not more important than the tree itself. Existing to feeding G_d as the tree feeds is the exchange. Risking our lives to keep alive only to be devoured is the same risk the tree was put under. If we are superior to the tree, why should we not be able to bear the same risks, at the very least? After all, we are the consumers of the tree, we were the ones who stole the fruit, we are more guilty than the tree.
Last but not least, the tree is a providing machine, while us, as a consuming machine, have, on the other hand, the option to provide and to construct ourselves for providing, or at least exchanging. The tree has no such option. This leaves us with submitting ourselves to some brownian switching between consuming and providing. However this never happens smoothly, for there is the risk of being eaten too. There is not a single person that will honestly submit themselves to such brownian motion, though J_sus implied it by comparing us to sheeps respecting the tree only eating the grass - a compromise. And people, nations and saints have adopted that system of humble restrained consumption avoiding starvation, a system that should make the humble consumer richer than the tree and blessings rich Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden still.
None can reach G_d, so we will follow J_sus. That the state should have power over the trees and men over mere grass, was a winning compromise solution indeed - where people could keep to J_sus words while allowed to consume idolatry to the state. The success of the "grass" eaters over the state, however, has brought up a cheating of the deal with the anti-Christ.
On the other hand, the prosecutors of J_sus professed the right to enjoy both trees and grass, as a perfect right. The hypocrisy was that these people were not capable of protecting either, let alone at the same time.
While such sin that prevents us from providing exists to put us down, it also is a joyful proof of the existence of heaven. If sin did not exist, then the world would be perfect and would not need G_d. In my opinion, Jews are there to prove the existence of sin and hence G_d, while Christians are there to prove that one need not be concerned with sin so long as one consumes humbly as a sheep. In effect, the Christian is able to live in sin and to beat evil at its own game. There are many other various different roles that can be learned from both approaches.
Like this has anything to do with the right of Jews to bear arms in NY? It proves you are irrelevant.
I have known so many people; I've worked and been around people from different countries and religions, and I've lived overseas myself. I have known some Christian people, and they tend to think that the Jews are Gods chosen people. What I don't quite understand is that they think you must believe Jesus died on the cross for our sins in order to go to Heaven, but Jewish people have a special clause by way of being Jewish that exempts them from this rule. I've never quite understood that line of reasoning. Also, my good friend whom I've known since we were 11, grew up Catholic and converted to Judaism. She did this about 10 years ago, and went through all the stuff of what they have to do. She has learned Hebrew and is very active in her Synogogue. Her parents think she is a little nuts but she has always been very interested in religion and felt being Jewish went along with her true beliefs.
I have run into some Jewish people who do look down on Christians, thinking of them as Tammy Faye Baker types or those Christians in Appaliachia (sp) who play with snakes to prove their faith. People do tend to stereotype. I don't judge people by their religion, I like people who are nice and not cruel. My step-grandfather was Jewish. My grandmother remarried after my grandfather was killed, but Frank was Jewish, so they had to escape to the US. It was a wild story, but they made it and settled in Washington DC. My mother who was not Jewish so was in no danger, stayed in Austria until after the war, and then she came over.
Hmmm.
By the way, are you going to learn to write and speak English soon?
Like you have a title to the US accademy of Litterature to make such judgments. I guess you are good about gossiping about yourself too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.