Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Senator Pardek
Good evening, Senator.

On the "Declaration of War" issue, the Congress passed a resolution for the President to use all necessary means including military force under the "War Powers Act," on 18 September, 2001. It was included in the Anti-Terrorism Act that passed that day, with only one dissenting vote.

As a firm supporter of the Constitution I agree that a clearer action should have been taken. Rep. Bob Barr and six other members of the House had introduced a separate resolution that was a "Declaration of War." That resolution was tabled, and the other one, which came from the Senate, was used.

Of course, as the Constitution says, a declaration of war requires only Congressional action. They do not require any signature by the President, and cannot be vetoed by him. However, from a legal standpoint, there is no impediment to including this -- as passed by Congress -- within the text of a law, which was then signed by the President.

In short, what was done was a little sloppy, but under the Constitution we are now in a state of declared war. The press hasn't made much of this, but it is there in the official language of 18 September, 2001.

The relevance of that issue to this most interesting thread is it affects the charges, trial, and conditions on this defendant if -- and only if -- the charges get broader than rape of a child. That charge is, of course, a Florida crime only, subject to the usual Florida provisions for a criminal trial.

Congressman Billybob

Click for: "New Daniel, Same Lions, Bad Outcome."

503 posted on 06/15/2002 6:39:28 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
Of course, as the Constitution says, a declaration of war requires only Congressional action.

Thank you. The militia types always claim that Congress must make a "formal" declaration of war - but I can never find it in Mankind's greatest document.

They fail to realize that The Founding Fathers included that provision so that a power-hungry POTUS could not launch a vendetta against a country he personally did not care for - The People must assent.

And they did, through their representatives in Congress.

I agree - it was sloppy. However, on Dec. 8, 1941 the Congress made a "formal" declaration for political reasons (good for national morale) and the Congress did not in 2001, so as to not give aid and comfort to our worldwide enemies ("see you just want to bomb Muslim civilians!")

504 posted on 06/15/2002 6:58:11 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson