Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Pushes Gore Plan For Orwellian Government
NewsWithViews.com ^ | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 06/12/2002 11:34:46 AM PDT by Sir Gawain

BUSH PUSHES GORE PLAN FOR ORWELLIAN GOVERNMENT

 
By Chuck Baldwin
June 11, 2002
NewsWithViews.com

Those who voted for G. W. Bush thinking they were getting a significantly different type of government from the Clinton-Gore years need to think again. Bush's proposal to consolidate federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities is actually a replay of an old plan first submitted by Al Gore.

A June 10 CNS news report stated, "Some members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, were surprised by President Bush's proposed consolidation of federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities under a new cabinet level Department of Homeland Security.

"But some are even more surprised to learn the plan has much in common with a nine-year-old idea hatched in the Clinton-Gore administration, which proposed a significant expansion of domestic police powers."

The report further stated, "Numerous components of President Bush's proposal, which were sketched out in a televised address last Thursday, are strikingly similar to a plan proposed by former Vice President Al Gore as part of the Clinton-Gore 'Partnership for Reinventing Government' in 1993."

The Bush-Gore plan to "reinvent government" is, in fact, nothing new. It is as old as tyranny itself - and that is exactly what the Bush-Gore plan is: a modern attempt to reinstall tyrannical government.

In the British newspaper, The Register, Thomas Greene states, "The real purpose (of Bush's proposal), clearly, is data acquisition, mining and manipulation on a gargantuan scale." He is right. Bush's reintroduction of the Clinton-Gore plan has shades of Hitler's SS corps. It is the beginning of a national police force in the United States.

Of course, when Al Gore submitted this plan back in 1993, vociferous opposition from the entire conservative community resisted it. As a result, the plan was summarily defeated.

However, things are different now. A Republican occupies the White House. Furthermore, the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington have created a "security-at-all-costs" mentality among the American people. Because of this, Bush will succeed in implementing the Clinton-Gore plan of freedom confiscation with little or no opposition.

What really takes the cake is the manner in which President Bush continues to coddle illegal aliens. He refuses to deport those whom U.S. law requires to be deported, he continues to promote the concept of granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, he refuses to take serious measures to keep likely terrorists out of our country, yet, he seems determined to thoroughly dismantle constitutional protection of our liberties.

What conservatives would have never surrendered to Al Gore, they seem happy to acquiesce to George Bush. However, the Clinton- Gore plan to eviscerate America's liberties smells as rotten (even worse) when George Bush regurgitates it! So, what has happened to conservatives' smellers?

 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721 next last
To: Native American Female Vet
*gasp* How offensive for you to call me a newbie! Hold on while I wipe this tear from my eye.
41 posted on 06/13/2002 10:42:27 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
However, irrelevent is irrelevent.
42 posted on 06/13/2002 12:29:56 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Hey, Special Ed, is 'irrelevant' your 'vocabulary helper' for the day?
43 posted on 06/13/2002 12:35:34 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Glad to see you are picking up on some things. Now all we have to do is expand your interest to the rest of reality. That should only take a couple of centuries.
44 posted on 06/13/2002 1:55:05 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
I'm tired of playing 'Spot the Non-sequitur'.

B'bye!

45 posted on 06/13/2002 2:09:53 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
He is on a Civil War thread.
46 posted on 06/13/2002 3:00:34 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Bush Extremely Proud Of New Suit

47 posted on 06/13/2002 3:04:04 PM PDT by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Shhhhh...you'll wake the Sleepers.
48 posted on 06/13/2002 3:45:57 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain; That Subliminal Kid
Wrong, newbie.
83847 is anything but a newbie!
49 posted on 06/13/2002 3:50:49 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I've always admired Chuck's take on things.

Personally, I believe that we're fast approaching the point where there's no turning back the control-freaks, reguardless of their party. A two-headed beast, feeding from the same trough.

Once the point of no return has been reached, then what do we do? Cave in and join it? Not me. This beast eats it's children.

Whenever I float the idea of constitution-loving Americans relocating to a state or two on the Northern border, taking over it politically and then seceding, well, I won't repeat most of the remarks.

Nevertheless, I think that's going to be the choice forced upon us, eventually. Balkinization is already here; the government is encouraging it, and there are not enough of us to undo the damage that has been done.

50 posted on 06/13/2002 4:04:52 PM PDT by Washington_minuteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
"This beast eats its children."

This beast, as you call it, prefers to have the parents deliver their children up for sacrifice.

That act demonstrates the love you should have for your master.

"Pass your children through the flames--it's the law!"

51 posted on 06/13/2002 4:10:38 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
I pray that you are wrong and I fear that you are not.
52 posted on 06/13/2002 4:38:14 PM PDT by thepitts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

1) Re-read your post.

2) As I stated before, from here it looks to me like the only bunch running and hiding like little girls are the people willing to comprimise anything and everything so fedgov can maken them feel "safe"

Ben Franklin spoke about these people, and what he said wasn't very nice.

53 posted on 06/13/2002 4:50:18 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain; Pete, weikel, Darth Sidious; headsonpikes; Cacophonous; FormerLurker; mercy...
Great post. And plenty of info in the links provided here, as always. Makes me think of all the ages old NGO's that used to be viewed as "fringe", but now have The Constition as their most valued selling point. JBS, Ayn Rand Inst., etc. There are all those conservative links on FR front page. America is in distress. I would like to see every group state their position: Constitution/NO Constitution. Then fashion some sort of conservative/constition Web Ring.

Seems that the source of most of the liberal opposition, barring our leaders and Congress, is the thousands of UN NGO's, and hundreds of US NGO's here in our Country, incrementaly attacking our freedoms in the name of diversity. Last year, here on FR, the Enviromental Extremists were exposed when they went too far with the folks of Klamath Falls. There fight was out in the open, involving land and water. A lot of what we are fighting for we do on the web. Just thinking it's time to ask the "GOOD" NGO's that are for the people to join together.

54 posted on 06/13/2002 5:24:56 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Bump
55 posted on 06/13/2002 5:29:30 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
bump your ideas
56 posted on 06/13/2002 7:22:49 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Sound the alarm! The sky is falling!The sky is falling!
More hysterical nonsense from the FR paranoia basket cases.
You guys crack me up.
57 posted on 06/13/2002 7:30:09 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: Jhoffa_
Ben Franklin spoke about these people, and what he said wasn't very nice.

Franklin also said the following

There never was a good war or a bad peace
Benjamin Franklin 1706-1790

60 posted on 06/13/2002 8:03:15 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson