Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Four in Five Americans Would Give Up Some Freedom for More Security (MORON ALERT)
Tampa Bay Online (AP) ^ | 6-11-02 | Jennifer L. Brown

Posted on 06/11/2002 6:39:05 AM PDT by Boonie Rat

Poll: Four in Five Americans Would Give Up Some Freedom for More Security

By Jennifer L. Brown Associated Press Writer

Published: Jun 11, 2002

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - Four in five Americans would give up some freedoms to gain security and four in 10 worry terrorists will harm them or their family, a new Gallup poll shows.

About one-third of those polled favor making it easier for authorities to access private e-mail and telephone conversations. More than 70 percent are in favor of requiring U.S. citizens to carry identification cards with fingerprints, and 77 percent believe all Americans should have smallpox vaccinations.

"It was amazing the percentage of people who are willing to give up freedom to get back some sense of personal security," said Elaine Christiansen, senior research director for The Gallup Organization. "These aren't people who were necessarily near the twin towers, near the Pentagon, near the Murrah building. These are average people."

The telephone survey, conducted in March, included 934 people across the country. Researchers also polled about 500 people in each of three cities where terrorist attacks occurred - New York City, Washington, D.C., and Oklahoma City - to compare results with the general population survey.

The poll showed 8 percent of Americans are very worried and 31 percent are somewhat worried that they or someone in their family will become victims of a terrorist attack in the United States. In New York City, the level of worry is higher - 19 percent said they are very worried and 34 percent said they are somewhat worried.

Washington, D.C, and Oklahoma City reported levels of fear close to the national average.

Scientists involved in the poll said they were not surprised many Americans remain fearful after Sept. 11.

"The magnitude of the event was just so profound," said Carol North, a psychiatry professor at Washington University in St. Louis, who said talk of the war in Afghanistan, airline security and terrorist threats is propelling the fear.

The study was co-sponsored by The University of Oklahoma psychiatry department through a grant from the Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. The main survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points, while the margin of error for the survey in the three cities is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Meanwhile, a New York Times/CBS News poll found that 60 percent of New York City residents think the threat of a terrorist attack in their city is greater than it is in any other big city.

Barely 40 percent of respondents believe the city is safer than it had been four years ago, a decrease of 20 percent from those polled in August. Even so, nearly two-thirds of those surveyed said that given a choice, they would prefer to be living in the city four years from now than any other place.

The poll, conducted by telephone in English or Spanish June 4 through Sunday, surveyed 940 adults. It has a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-283 next last
To: 1bigdictator
On the balance, American citizens would not be forced to choose between personal liberties and national security if the liberals would allow certain common sense measures.

You are so right.
It cannot be emphasized enough.
We do not need to give up our liberties if common sense prevails.
Unfortunately, our socialist/secular humanist infected federal bureaucracy has none.

41 posted on 06/11/2002 7:39:51 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Its not that we're losing any freedom, or rights. Rather, American's must be willing to make short term sacrifices, in order to keep our overall freedoms intact

So let me be sure I understand you. We give up our freedom to keep freedom?

I will not insult you, but will count you among the 80%. Nor do I find that an odd position as I suspect that during the Revolution most of the country would have preferred that safety be maintained and a little freedom could be sacrificed.

"Once the government seizes a power it never gives it back."

42 posted on 06/11/2002 7:40:23 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Ben Franklin never had nukes to worry about. If so, he would have used common sense and put it in perspective.

Ben Franklin would have said we need to use whatever means available to survive and destroy the enemy (radical Islam...the pieceful religion).

43 posted on 06/11/2002 7:41:48 AM PDT by joyful1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billbears
The current lifting of certain restrictions on the FBI and CIA, should be welcomed by all American's.

Under who's discretion would this "certain" restrictions that are to be lifted fall? Who would these people be accountable to? Bush and his CFR cronies?

44 posted on 06/11/2002 7:43:19 AM PDT by mconder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: KirklandJunction
LOL Your credibility is lost. Attacking a FReeper screen name, is a cheap shot and is only used, when one has lost the argument. You expect to be taken seriously? Never!
45 posted on 06/11/2002 7:45:45 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

George Washington

46 posted on 06/11/2002 7:46:57 AM PDT by mconder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch
**most women are far more concerned with safety and security (for their families) than are men. **

What an insane comment. If women are more concerned about their families than men....then we have a real problem...with the men.

47 posted on 06/11/2002 7:47:45 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mconder
Nope. 20/20 vision and no glasses.

My eyesight is crystal clear.

48 posted on 06/11/2002 7:48:20 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: joyful1
Ben Franklin would have said we need to use whatever means available to survive and destroy the enemy (radical Islam...the pieceful religion).

You are so full of crap to assume Ben Franklin is an ends justifies the means type of guy...where the hell do you get this? Which portion of his writings would give credibility to this absurd statement?

49 posted on 06/11/2002 7:49:06 AM PDT by mconder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: banjo joe
Would that include you? Or are you the shining exception?
50 posted on 06/11/2002 7:49:16 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
If you aren't a terrorist, wishing to harm America and kill American's, you've got nothing to worry about. Go about your life and stop being paranoid and scared of your own shadow.

Ah yes...if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear. I suppose you won't mind random searches of your home to ensure that you aren't harboring any terrorists or plotting to overthrow the government, right?
51 posted on 06/11/2002 7:50:44 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
The more accurate question is:

Are you willing to give up more freedom for PERCEIVED security?

The government cannot guarantee security to any individual citizen. It's all perception based on illusion. Nothing is worth giving up freedom -- not even life itself.

52 posted on 06/11/2002 7:52:01 AM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mconder
Well said, wish I had used that! ;-)
53 posted on 06/11/2002 7:53:10 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: billbears
>>>These restrictions are not welcomed by this North Carolinian. It is one step closer to a secret police that only sheep will enjoy.

I see you're still whining.

If you're that unhappy here in the good old USA, I suggest you move, to a place more your liking.

54 posted on 06/11/2002 7:53:31 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
No insults here, but how often has the government relinquished emergency powers after the emergency is over?
55 posted on 06/11/2002 7:55:42 AM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
For the logical, this will get write to the point. If you don't see how this pertains to this thread no one can help you.

Roper So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law!

More Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

Roper I'd cut down every law in England to do that!

More Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you - where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast - man's laws, not God's - and if you cut them down - and you're just the man to do it - d'you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake.

56 posted on 06/11/2002 7:58:06 AM PDT by mconder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Uh yeah. I think you are the paranoid coward.

Last time I checked the US has in its arsenal a number of local, state, federal and global law enforcement and intelligence agencies with tremendous power, reach, influence and resources. And now goofs like you want to give them even more authority. IMO they have more than enough to protect this country.

57 posted on 06/11/2002 8:02:44 AM PDT by Stew Padasso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
>>>So let me be sure I understand you. We give up our freedom to keep freedom?

Seems you don't understand this. Re-read what I said.

>>>I will not insult you, but will count you among the 80%.

You just engaged in an insult. The title of the article speaks for itself. It appears you never passed reading comprehension in grade school.

We American's who support making sacrifices for the patriotic good of our country, aren't morons. In all wars, throughout US history, the American people have made sacrifices. That includes during the Revolutionary War.

58 posted on 06/11/2002 8:04:43 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
What do you propose instead? I gather you believe you have a better approach. How do we secure our borders, detain suspects, protect our citizens and secure our Constitutional freedoms? I have searched my heart and soul on this matter. I feel a very strong allegiance to the Constitution, as my great, great uncle penned it -- Morris. I was raised by his descendants and have his/their genes and values. I want to hear the alternatives.
59 posted on 06/11/2002 8:05:50 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
4 out of 5 are willing to give up some freedoms??? My question is this =WHAT FREEDOM??????????
60 posted on 06/11/2002 8:06:46 AM PDT by GeorgeHL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson