Skip to comments.
"We control two nuclear missiles" Hafiz Muhammad Saeed
www.markazdawa.org ^
| Jun 3 2002
| staff
Posted on 06/06/2002 9:24:07 AM PDT by lyonesse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FYI -- Markazdawa.org happens to be the website of the banned terrorist group Lakshar-e-Toiba of Pakistan.
1
posted on
06/06/2002 9:24:07 AM PDT
by
lyonesse
To: lyonesse
>"We control two nuclear missiles" Hafiz Muhammad Saeed. ... They shall be used against the enemies of IslamThe German World Cup soccer team?
-- KotS
To: lyonesse
Was this one of the guys/groups involved in the Parliament attack?
3
posted on
06/06/2002 9:27:55 AM PDT
by
Stevieboy
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Stevieboy
Yes -- together with another group called Jaish-e-Mohammad according to the Government of India.
5
posted on
06/06/2002 9:30:25 AM PDT
by
lyonesse
To: lyonesse
The most disconcerting issue is the question of Paki control over their own nukes. There are multiple reports on loose management of Paki nukes.
In the event of war, some Paki field commander, fearing the worst or about to be over-run, resorts to tactical nukes. Paki nuke protocols are reportedly
very bad. One report claimed Musharraf has no control, doesn't know the location of
Paki nukes. If they're in the field as
reported, even if under "loyal" commanders, their security is significantly at
risk. India responds in kind, heavily. Total missle flight time: 3-5 minutes. The World's Shortest and Deadliest War.
The sources quoted above are not all considered highly reliable, but some (U.S.) seem to be reasonably reliable. And they do paint a consistent picture. Does Musharraf have control? One hopes so, but given the level of sophistication in that part of the world, it is easy to imagine that fail-safe and C&C procedures are weak, especially with tactical nukes. I find it difficult to imagine that Pakistan has multiple, secure, nuclear-storage facilities, for example. Certainly the jihadis would love to get their hands on a nuke. And the religious, political, and personal ambitions of the key Paki players makes it an interesting brew.
Are there any wild-eyed
fanatics beyond ISI control out there? Probably. They are starting to turn
against Mush. If the jihadis, or even key segments of the Paki military, spin
out of control, all bets are off.
To: Stevieboy
You need
Thugburg, a veritable Who's Who of islamic thugery. :-)
(At the moment the organization links don't seem to be working, but you can always click on the subhuman's name to find out a little more about him.)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: lyonesse
Should one assume the "loyalists" are being identified and relieved of responsibility by Pak authorities immediately?
To: lyonesse
>"We control two nuclear missiles" Hafiz Muhammad Saeed. ... They shall be used against the enemies of Islam Well, Saeed, the US of A controls thousands of nuclear missiles, most of which are much more powerful than the crap that Pakistan has produced. If you wackos use them against our nation, you should know that your nation and the rest of the world's terrorist nations will have a near monopoly on the world supply of radioactive slag. Your pathetic countries will also have an overabundance of glass-covered parking lots. In short, don't F@#% with us - just ask the Germans and Japanese about that, and then consider that we are already the world's dominant military power, unlike the case in 1941.
To: lyonesse
Draw any time you're feeling ready, pardner.
To: lyonesse
Arabs are inclined to boast and lie. But it's possible. The Pakistani security forces and military both have long-standing links to Islamic terrorism.
12
posted on
06/06/2002 9:58:58 AM PDT
by
Cicero
To: lyonesse
bump
13
posted on
06/06/2002 9:59:14 AM PDT
by
dd5339
To: lyonesse
"We control two nuclear missiles"Prove it, Hafiz. If you can't, you'll be shown up for the worthless blowhard you are. If you can, you'll give the entire civilized world the excuse it needs to completely take over the Wahabbist Arab countries and imprison and/or kill every last one of you psychotics.
14
posted on
06/06/2002 9:59:20 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: LibWhacker
You need Thugburg, a veritable Who's Who of islamic thugery."Get yer scorecard!
Get yer scorecard here!
Y'can't tell the combatants without a scorecard!"
15
posted on
06/06/2002 10:01:53 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: lyonesse
June 3, 2002: "We control two nuclear missiles" - Hafiz Muhammad Saeed June 3, 2003: "Remember Islam?" - Me
To: lyonesse
"We control two nuclear missiles"I'll see you your two and raise you the entire Western world.
Now, let's see your cards, moron...
17
posted on
06/06/2002 10:04:00 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: lyonesse
Dear Hafiz Muhammad Saeed,
Thank you for informing us that you control two nuclear missiles.
You have just given us justification to take out all of Pakistan's nuclear weapons in a first strike scenario.
George W. Bush
President of the United States of America
18
posted on
06/06/2002 10:12:42 AM PDT
by
McGruff
To: Cicero
I'm sure they could have a couple of warheads.
Missle delivery systems are doubtful.
They could be in Canada, Mexico or even in the US.
The problem is retaliation. Who do we target?
Terrorist cells are known to be in this country.
All they have to do is get a paneled truck and drive it into NYC or DC and activate it.
Why one hasn't one gone off yet?
Well, it could be the lack of a proper arming device.
When you only have one or two of these weapons you can't afford to waste them.
19
posted on
06/06/2002 10:33:16 AM PDT
by
johnny7
To: johnny7
The problem is retaliation. Who do we target?I say we go for the nest.
20
posted on
06/06/2002 10:56:32 AM PDT
by
Sender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson