Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Landmark Calls on Leahy to Step Aside on September 11 Probe
Landmark Legal Foundation ^ | 6/4/02

Posted on 06/04/2002 12:40:01 PM PDT by wcdukenfield

Senator Patrick Leahy
Chairman
Senate Judiciary Committee
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

June 4, 2002

Re: Status of Senate Judiciary
Chairman Patrick Leahy

Dear Senator Leahy:

On July 28, 1987, you were forced to resign from the Senate Intelligence Committee (“Committee”). Specifically, you disclosed to one or more reporters information from a confidential draft report that the Committee had voted against releasing.

Landmark Legal Foundation (“Landmark”) contacted the Senate Ethics Committee in search of any investigative information relating to your unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Landmark was informed that any such information no longer exists. To this day, the public does not know the full extent of your misconduct. However, what is known is that you leaked confidential information in contravention of a Committee decision.

If you cannot be trusted to serve on the Senate Intelligence Committee, then you cannot be trusted to serve as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at a time when that Committee is overseeing an investigation into the government’s intelligence operations – specifically, the FBI’s counter-terrorism activities. This is the most important investigation of national security matters since the Empire of Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. You will have access to thousands of pages of classified information and closed door testimony.

Moreover, potential witnesses are likely to be less forthcoming because of your track record of compromising confidential information.

Therefore, Landmark asks that you step aside as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee until the Committee has completed its highly sensitive investigation. If you refuse to do so voluntarily, Landmark asks that the other Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee direct you to step aside.

In addition, by this letter, Landmark is requesting that the Attorney General direct the FBI to withhold classified information from the Committee until you step aside.

Sincerely,

Mark R. Levin

CC: Attorney General John Ashcroft


Sen. Orrin Hatch, Ranking Member
Sen. Edward Kennedy
Sen. Joseph Biden
Sen. Herbert Kohl
Sen. Dianne Feinstein
Sen. Russell Feingold
Sen. Charles Schumer
Sen. Richard Durbin
Sen. Maria Cantwell
Sen. John Edwards
Sen. Strom Thurmond
Sen. Charles Grassley
Sen. Arlen Specter
Sen. Jon Kyl
Sen. Mike DeWine
Sen. Jeff Sessions
Sen. Sam Brownback
Sen. Mitch McConnell


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: landmark; leahy; levin; senate; september11
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: wcdukenfield
Excellent. Levin sure is true to his word. On his radio show Sunday he said he was going to write a letter to Leahy asking him to recuse himself.
21 posted on 06/04/2002 12:58:43 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
It's nice to see that Landmark has taken a break from hassling the Bush Administration to hassle Senator Leahy. This is Klayman's organization, keep in mind. Every time I get one of their fundraising pamphlets lauding their efforts to tear documents out of the hands of the NEA, I wonder whether I can send a segregated donation, on the condition that none of the money I provide may be used to treat the Bush Administration as if it were its predecessor.
22 posted on 06/04/2002 1:00:59 PM PDT by lawyamike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
My money is we will see a leak in tomorrow's issue of the Washington Post....

Any takers???

23 posted on 06/04/2002 1:01:38 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Leaky Leahy.....PERFECT Name for the bast@rd. What a horrible human being.
24 posted on 06/04/2002 1:01:47 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
You go Mark! Nice to see you out and about.
25 posted on 06/04/2002 1:02:41 PM PDT by Love of Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawyamike
No and no and no!!! Klayman's organization is Judicial Watch! Mark Levin is Landmark Legal Foundation, and they actually DO things!!

Wash your mouth out with soap!!

26 posted on 06/04/2002 1:02:47 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Whoa! Holdonnow!!!
27 posted on 06/04/2002 1:02:50 PM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I stand corrected, and I apologize for the slander.
28 posted on 06/04/2002 1:03:38 PM PDT by lawyamike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
One of the 100 Smartest Lawyers in the country is NOT on the Judiciary Committee.....Wonder Why Not?? Of course I am speaking of Hillary Clinton....why didn't she pick a committee of which she is an "expert"???
29 posted on 06/04/2002 1:04:26 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
It will be the NY Times, and the teaser headline on drudge will be, "GOP Leaked Top Secret Military Information", or something simiilar.
30 posted on 06/04/2002 1:07:41 PM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lawyamike
Landmark is not Klayman's org. Judicial Watch is!!!
31 posted on 06/04/2002 1:07:49 PM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Thank the Lord for Landmark Legal and The Great One! Though I don't expect sinator depends to heed the call, or the lieberal media to report this, at least this is probably enough to cause the sinator to need a new depends.
32 posted on 06/04/2002 1:10:44 PM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Landmark was informed that any such information no longer exists.

It no longer exists?????

HELLO .. what the heck do they mean it doesn't exist

BTW .. thanks for the Ping .. Great letter

33 posted on 06/04/2002 1:13:08 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
POINT MADE........POINT WILL BE IGNORED BY THE SENATE!

Further, Congress still allows Gary Condit to sit on the Intelligence Committee in that body.

34 posted on 06/04/2002 1:15:57 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
I love Mark Levin!

Thanks for the ping! This is great!!!

35 posted on 06/04/2002 1:16:27 PM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Politicians leak when it suits them. That's where Mr. Drudge came from and why he continues to exist.
36 posted on 06/04/2002 1:17:32 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Leahy made a deal with a reporter.....he would leave classified documents on his desk. When the reporter arrived, Leahy would leave the room and allow the reporter to peruse the documents.

This classified information was printed in the media, resulting in great harm to our intellience gathering people. I believe, but am not sure that an agent was murdered as a result of the released information.

37 posted on 06/04/2002 1:19:12 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
For once, somebody is going after the group that need to be gone after in ref to prior knowledge of 9-11. And that person is NOT President Bush. Thank GOD for Mark Levin!

WOO-HOO! I couldn't agree more. WTG Mark Levin!

38 posted on 06/04/2002 1:20:12 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Leaky Leahy??? We're ready.


39 posted on 06/04/2002 1:21:27 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
My money is we will see a leak in tomorrow's issue of the Washington Post....
Any takers???

NOPE ... but I will bet you are correct

40 posted on 06/04/2002 1:22:12 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson