Skip to comments.
Conservatives Claim Nickelodeon Promoting Homosexual Agenda
CNSNEWS.com ^
| 6/04/02
| Matt Pyeatt
Posted on 06/04/2002 2:23:49 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
1
posted on
06/04/2002 2:23:50 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"What kind of pro-homosexual message will she be giving these children?" Lafferty asked. "Where's the balance? Why not invite Dr. Laura on the show?"
Because balance would shed "Light" on the topic, and "you-know-who" cringes and hides from the "Light".
Some diversity, what a bunch of detestable hypocrites.
Oh, there WILL be "wailing and gnashing of teeth".
2
posted on
06/04/2002 4:05:36 AM PDT
by
Psalm 73
To: kattracks
ah, yes. Now I remember why we turned the cable off.
3
posted on
06/04/2002 4:14:40 AM PDT
by
doodad
To: kattracks
I really, REALLY resent how O'Donnell has turned Nick into her own personal plaything.
Spongebob Squarepants is ASEXUAL, dammit!!
To: kattracks
I believe Nick is owned by MTV...why should we expect less?
5
posted on
06/04/2002 4:21:17 AM PDT
by
aardvark1
To: kattracks
No more "Bob the Builder" for MY five year old daughter! Nuff Said!
To: kattracks
Bump for later...
7
posted on
06/04/2002 5:46:58 AM PDT
by
EdReform
To: EdReform
This just in....NAMBLA announces they are now the primary sponsors of Rugrats (TM). Nickelodeon will introduce a long lost uncle, Uncle Wickle Pickle, who will convey their message to the show's fans.
To: RabidBartender
I have always said that Rugrats will be the first cartoon to promote homosexuality
9
posted on
06/04/2002 6:14:02 AM PDT
by
jgrubbs
To: doodad
I recently got cable in my house. Nickelodeon is the one channel that I have programmed out. Why would anybody let a TV network dump whatever they want into his child's brain. Kids hook into Nickelodeon and they will watch all day long. Does anybody really trust the corporate owners of Nickelodeon that much?
10
posted on
06/04/2002 6:16:08 AM PDT
by
gridlock
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
I say leave them alone and let them get the show produced and "in the can"...THEN, when the evidence is on tape, let Ashcroft & company swoop in and subpoena the program before it hits the air so they can comb it for evidence of contributing to the delinquency of minors, child sexual abuse (persuasive intent), and a whole slew of other such charges!
This could make for the biggest case against perversion in history...Think about it...It's not just some bozo in a raincoat in an alley trying to talk your CHILD into sexual awareness & activity, this is a NETWORK led by Ellerbe & O'Donut trying to do it on a massive scale by airwaves!
To: gridlock
I recently got cable in my house. Nickelodeon is the one channel that I have programmed out. I have DirecTV and have programmed out Nickelodeon as well as other channels.
I believe the person who started Nick was Geraldine Claybourne (sp?).
She is a radical feminist who is one of the founders of the Oxygen channel (also deprogrammed in my house).
To: kattracks
Do you think homosexuals are discriminated against because of who they are?
Shouldn't that read as "...because of WHAT they are..>"?
Do you think we need laws to protect gays and lesbians from discrimination
Sounds like 'Reverse Discrimination' to me. Why should any person have a Special Book of Laws, simply because they are Sodomites ??
To: kattracks
New on TV: Search for a Playboy Playmate
Three of the twelve women who started out on this show were from the Cleveland area. >:)
-Eric
15
posted on
06/04/2002 6:31:41 AM PDT
by
E Rocc
To: kattracks
Wonder what age groups will be represented by the children on this show? I won't be surprised if Nick has kids ranging in age from 1st grade (6 years old) and up.
To: kattracks
No surprise from MTV owned Nickelodeon.
17
posted on
06/04/2002 6:46:16 AM PDT
by
agrace
To: 3catsanadog
Never mind - I spotted the sentence - 8 years to 13. Then I read the entire link and somewhere it said that the kids were already claiming they were homosexual. An 8 year old knows this already?
To: kattracks
"the program in question, is aimed at viewers between the ages of eight and 13.
This topic is not suitable for children in that age group. I really didn't believe all the hooplah over the "gay agenda" until we purchased a CD on U.S. History for children "ages 6 & up". And - whaddaya know - "gay rights" was a main topic on the CD. My 6-year-old doesn't even know about heterosexual sex yet. Good thing we looked it over first. We returned it for a refund.
To: Tired of Taxes
And - whaddaya know - "gay rights" was a main topic on the CD.As if that has anything to do with U.S. History. Good for you for returning it. BTW, where did you purchase it and who (if you remember) produced it?
20
posted on
06/04/2002 7:07:14 AM PDT
by
scan58
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson