[christine]

It tells me that, Clinton-like, you'll denounce me the instant I disagree with the man of the hour. I've noticed on this thread that every single time someone even questions Bush's agenda, they are attacked as a "whiner" and "disloyal" and on and on it goes. People who are committed to limited government, a constitutionally bound judiciary, and who are staunchly pro-life are considered no better than the mindless leftists. Something seems wrong with this picture.

well said, capt!

[rintense]

Conversely, the same can be said about anyone who questions Rush.

[fightinJAG]

Actually, the name-calling is just as bad if you are a person who happens to support Bush on a particular issue.

Some people don't want to discuss the merits of any given issue or agree that there are some issues on which reasonable people can disagree. They simply want to call those they disagree with names and impugn their integrity and their motives.

CaptBlack, I do not happen to agree with some of your concerns regarding our President. But I would never consider you a whiner or disloyal.

I do have a problem, however, when, in my view, criticism of a good man (Bush) is not well thought-out or justified by the facts and that view can't be raised without being labeled a goosestepper.