[rintense]

I will speculate and say this, however. If another attack even more serious than 9-11 happens, everyone will cry foul and say Bush didn't do enough. Yet, there are some now who are saying he's doing too much- including Rush and other conservative talk show hosts. You can't have it both ways. But I suspect that it will be those who are crying foul now will be the same people complaining that not enough was done. It is the nature of the beast. After all, hindsight is 20/20. And we are seeing that right now.

[B Knotts]

Yet, there are some now who are saying he's doing too much- including Rush and other conservative talk show hosts.

Well, I think what I've heard (not so much from Rush, but from other hosts) is that he's doing too much of the wrong things (like frisking grandma at the airport gate) and not enough of the right things (like suspending student visas from places like Saudi Arabia, or allowing vanloads of illegal Pakistani immigrants to be detained).

[caddie]

This is my final concluding statement.

What could be more serious than taking down our Pentagon, our World Trade Center (perceived by the towelheads as like a mecca-type monolith) and, as they had planned, the White House?

[That is what the Pennsylvania flight was going to do, most people think.]

Just what does it take, my friend, to get your dander up?

9/11 was more terrible, higher profile, and more provocative, than even 12/7/41. Do you disagree?

What does provocation have to be for you?

A nuke on NYC?

10 million Americans dead?

What?

At what point will you conclude that W is just a wimp?