[caddie]

This is my final concluding statement.

What could be more serious than taking down our Pentagon, our World Trade Center (perceived by the towelheads as like a mecca-type monolith) and, as they had planned, the White House?

[That is what the Pennsylvania flight was going to do, most people think.]

Just what does it take, my friend, to get your dander up?

9/11 was more terrible, higher profile, and more provocative, than even 12/7/41. Do you disagree?

What does provocation have to be for you?

A nuke on NYC?

10 million Americans dead?

What?

At what point will you conclude that W is just a wimp?

[rintense]

Why don't you admit you don't like Bush and never did. You, yourself, said that something worse than 9-11 would happen. Not me. Secondly, President Bush's actions in light of 9-11 have been just fine in my opinion. But then again, because you dislike what Bush has done, you couldn't possibly understand why anyone else would support him. Believe it or not, it IS possible to still disagree with the President and still support him.

I asked you a diredct question about what you'd do. Your answer was cutting ties with Saudi Arabia. That's it? Do you really think that would solve all the ills and all the issues you have with the President?

I seriously doubt it.