LIMBAUGH RIPS BUSH WHITE HOUSE OVER GLOBAL WARMING 'FLIP-FLOP'

Drudge Report ^ | 6/3/02 | Matt Drudge

[Deb]

Just a guess...the "Drug War" is your biggest problem.

(PS: no money is being spent on unmarrieds marrying. Unmarrieds on welfare will be encouraged to marry.) The rest of your list is usual Third Party crapola.

[NittanyLion]

You guessed it, thats exactly what Bush is going to do.

I agree, although I'm still concerned that this report has acknowledged human actions cause global warming. It would appear the 10 years of study will be centered around what to do about it as opposed to whether it exists in the first place. Am I wrong?

[christine]

wink backatcha! ;)

[BillofRights]

Then why are you here? LPers aren't conservative?

Are you going to tell me what I am? Libertarians can be liberal-libertarians or conservative-libertarians. I happen to be a conservative-libertarian, or a strict Constitutionalist. I find my views align consistently with those of people like Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Ward Connerly, Charlie Reece, and the like. It is true, I am not a Republican, but don't tell me I'm not a conservative!

[NittanyLion]

Any opinion on #831 or #893?

[christine]

it was a typo. do you ever make them?

[TLBSHOW]

The rats right now think 50% of the posters at FR hate Bush. That is their plan don't fall for it.

[ohioWfan]

No, it's your implication that Rush should never air any negative commentary about Bush's policies because GW is beyond reproach as president

I neither said, nor implied that. Rush has every right to say whatever he wants, no matter how dumb, which is obviously what has decided to do.

Criticizing the President and his policies is perfectly fine. Saying he is the same as algore is stupid. Rush has lost it, and his audience is shrinking by the day now. He's free to say whatever he wants, but this is a capitalistic country, my friend. If consumers don't like what he has to say, they won't listen, and he'll lose profits.

If he's smart, he'll stop what he's doing, because we 'consumers' know better than to believe the tripe he's been dishing out lately.

[BillofRights]

he has more rights today than when Bush took office.

How do you know? Wanna bet?

I only use the money/property argument as one example of Rights being removed. I could give others, and have in several replies on this thread.

[Joe Hadenuf]

When losing a debate, attack the spelling errors and typos, and throw up other smoke. Its a good distraction and diversion anyway.

[goldilucky]

Clinton gutted the FBI and now its seems like he is trying to make another come back in the 2002 presidential election. Some people just don't know when to call it quits. For Clinton to be running for third term is OVERKILL.

[christine]

uh huh....and don't forget the name calling. ;)

[Tribune7]

Moral: When in doubt, doubt the Times.

[jwalsh07]

I think so. I'm agnostic. I remember when they were screaming about an ice age. It is tough to make an educated statement because the data is mixed and inconclusive.

Sure, we've burned fossil fuels for a while but we also put out forest fires. The only axe I have to grind here is that the information and recommendations be based on science and not ideology. If there's a problem we can deal with it....

or not.:-}

[concerned about politics]

Most Christians I know are thrilled with this Godly President because of his morality, pro-life, pro-family, and pro-responsibility positions.

Oh yes. He did "mention " that, didn't he. Wow. (empty words). Clinton even carried a bible! What's the diff? Clinton refered to his God many times.
Keyes is doing more for this issue than Bush, and he's not even an official! Had I understood Keyes in 2000, I just may have voted for him.
We're passing the word around about Bushs anti-Christian deeds, and exposing his false testomies. We do have meetings. Nice of you to ask.
As far as our Church politics, not the other socialist issues Bush seems to adhere to, Bush hired Sodomites. Did he not read the Bible he says he believes in? Does he not know what God has done to them throughout history?
Bush threw money at the pagan public schools that teach the nations children to go ahead, here's your condomn and your fisting kits for the weekend. Remember to pray to mother gaia, your blessed mother earth, before you go out! It's beter he had a millstone tied around his neck!
Does he not know if you give a man a fish, he'll just come back again for more?
Bush "claims" to be a man of God, yet doesn't show it in deeds. Just empty "suggestions."

National policies are another story. I'm sure you've read the long list of give aways already, so I won't bother re-writing the entire sell out list. You can go back and read them for yourself.

[Sabertooth]

Clinton gutted the FBI and now its seems like he is trying to make another come back in the 2002 presidential election.

I would have a hard time voting for Clinton this year.

[NittanyLion]

The only axe I have to grind here is that the information and recommendations be based on science and not ideology.

Agreed. All the info I've read suggests all we have to go on right now is ideology. There's no sound science on the subject; certainly not enough to suggest we should base political/economic decisions on it.

[BillofRights]

Habs, I believe that all Rights derive from property. If you have no property Rights, you have no Rights. Taxes are fine as long as they are Constitutional. The Constitution only authorizes (1) indirect taxes, such as excises, duties, and imposts and (2) direct taxes that are apportioned among the states. These types of taxes are uniform and Constitutional. No problem. However, it does not authorize the federal government to directly tax private citizens living within the 50 states on their domestic income. Yet, these are the taxes being collected by the private corporation -- IRS and going to the private banking cartel -- Federal Reserve, and used to enslave the productive citizens.

[jwalsh07]

Yep.

[nunya bidness]

You defending global warming junk science is a hoot. Pardon me while I belly laugh.