Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIMBAUGH RIPS BUSH WHITE HOUSE OVER GLOBAL WARMING 'FLIP-FLOP'
Drudge Report ^ | 6/3/02 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 06/03/2002 10:04:46 AM PDT by hchutch

Just the headline


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; drudge; limbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,341-1,348 next last
To: BillofRights
Before 9/11 the FBI was constrained into investigating a crime after it happened. You as a private citizen could surf the internet and follow up on all the leads you wanted in relation to suspicions but the FBI couldn't until now, thanks to Mueller. Everything I've stated here is the absolute truth.
741 posted on 06/03/2002 7:07:12 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies]

To: marajade
ok, marajade, if you call 'an expression to make a point' a lie, then fine.

i care nothing about my credibility with you.

and, fyi, i read deb's posts and i disagree with her.

742 posted on 06/03/2002 7:07:37 PM PDT by christine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Very true. You too!
Bookmarking so I can see who's the last one standing when I wake up in the morning.
743 posted on 06/03/2002 7:08:22 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies]

To: christine11
i read deb's posts and i disagree with her.

Everything she stated about the FBI was the truth...

What do you think all the hoopla about the guideline changes at the FBI was all about?

744 posted on 06/03/2002 7:10:23 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Bookmarking so I can see who's the last one standing when I wake up in the morning.

My guess it will get so bad and deteriorate to the point where it will get pulled before morning...

745 posted on 06/03/2002 7:11:20 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: marajade
You are too naive for words!
746 posted on 06/03/2002 7:12:41 PM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: christine11
What do you disagree with?
747 posted on 06/03/2002 7:12:54 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: borkrules
I don't know about others here, but I helped elect Bush to advance a conservative agenda, not sit on a huge pile of political capital and good will (70%+ approval) and make "strategic concessions" to our mortal political enemies.

It's a horde of political good will, still in the high 70s, a modest retreat from those heady 90+ days, but look at all we've gotten for spending those 12 points so judiciously. Look how the Dems have absolutely CAVED on our issues!

The lesson that Bush the Elder didn't learn was that when you have 80% or 90% approval, you can't bank it, you binge.... gamble.... go for broke.

Because in the end you'll be broke or out to pasture anyway.

Political capital is nothing like financial capital, for it often accrues through spending and has a shelf-life that can't be ignored.




748 posted on 06/03/2002 7:13:13 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: BillofRights
Maybe so, I know I'm voting for Bush in 2004.
749 posted on 06/03/2002 7:14:03 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Now, I finally understand the meaning of "rascally republican" and it's our good President, for sure. He is perhaps practicing the fine art of "pretzel diplomacy". This is evidenced by the twists to the left, and turns to the right, and slides to the center of his domestic and foreign policy positions.

He's winning in his foreign policy postures as his administration is breaking the code of the "evil doer" network and he will eventually successfully bring them down. And in the meantime, domestically, he has developed a much more modern playbook that certainly has successfully blocked and muzzled the old left's stale and predictable political maneuvering. Each time the left gathers strength to rise up with over confidence, Bush easily swats them away like pesky mosquitos.

The fact that some of the twists to the left and slides to the center domestically are like rubbing salt into the wounds of conservative principles and visions.

Beats me, though, really what is going on, but in the final analysis, IMHO, President Bush is thinking long range and lasting legacy in his ardent and fervent protection of America against the "evil doers" and thinking short term on the domestic perhaps to get us into the election with a winning opportunity to win stunningly more republican seats in Congress.

It is not as easy to frankly know what is going on, as Rush states, we aren't in planning meetings with the President, and without him actually sitting down and telling conservatives just what the heck is going on around here, who knows? But, he is perfectly clear about the present dangers America faces from her enemies. Even most of the left is aware of this first and foremost fact after picking themselves up again for their next attempt in trying to lower the President's popularity. To date, they have failed miserably.

750 posted on 06/03/2002 7:14:19 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
Since when do logical or restrained policies work with democrats, especially when you have conceded the high ground by agreeing with them?

I consider this statement ridiculous. According to you logical and restrained policies can not be applies by Republican administrations because they democrats don't like them. Can I infer that illogical and unrestrained policy making would make you happy?

Bush has also left our borders wide open to terrorists, continues to allow immigration from Muslim nations that harbor terrorism, refuses to enforce our nation's immigration laws, keeps an open borders libertarian in charge of the INS, has banned profiling in airports, pursues amnesty for lawbreaking illegal aliens, allows Mexico to mettle in our domestic affairs and otherwise push us around.

Can I assume from this that you're not a libertarian? LOL. I agree that "illegal" immigration is a problem that has to be dealt with now. I also agree that searching Grannies, thats my wife, shoes when she is an American Army vet and grandmother of 5 while not paying closer attention to men between the ages of 17 and 45 of Middle Eastern descent does not make a helluva lot of sense.

When it comes to protecting Americans against terrorism and standing up for our sovereignty as a nation Bush is about as wimpy as they come.

Tell that to the dead skells pushing up poppies in Afghanistan.

751 posted on 06/03/2002 7:14:58 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Let me restate that for Mr. Paulson2...

With what do you disagree?

752 posted on 06/03/2002 7:15:26 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Good! That's why what's left of our freedoms will be gone shortly. People like you are a threat to freedom. I know I will NOT be voting for the socialist LIAR in 2004 like I did in 2000.
753 posted on 06/03/2002 7:16:09 PM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: marajade
You know in the long run I think its better that CFR is going to the US Supreme Court now. Because once its dead there, congress wouldn't be there to vote it back in after a veto.

1. The Supreme Court won't void all of CFR, and it's all bad.

2. Bush could have sustained a veto if he'd tried.

3. Further ground was given on the principle that it is acceptable for the government to limit free speech under the guise of campaign finance regulation. We'll bleed for that turf later.




754 posted on 06/03/2002 7:18:03 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Rush stepped on it vis a vis the Globaloney Story in the Times. When he's right, he's right, re;CFR. When he's wrong, like today, he should apologise.
755 posted on 06/03/2002 7:18:51 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: BillofRights
If voting for Bush is a threat to your freedom then I take delight in voting for him again in 2004.
756 posted on 06/03/2002 7:18:52 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
A "globilist" is one who perceives the world in terms other that the sovereignty of the constitutional republic of the United States of America. Come on and argue with that, sir.
757 posted on 06/03/2002 7:19:53 PM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The Supreme Court won't void all of CFR, and it's all bad.

If they don't then they will with anything that means anything...

758 posted on 06/03/2002 7:19:58 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: harpo11
All that makes sense, except to the Bush-bangers. Their hobbyhorses have a good head of steam and ain't nuthin' gonna knock 'em off now!
759 posted on 06/03/2002 7:19:58 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Should read...

3. Further ground was given on the principle that it is unacceptable for the government to limit free speech under the guise of campaign finance regulation. We'll bleed for that turf later.



760 posted on 06/03/2002 7:20:11 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,341-1,348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson