Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIMBAUGH RIPS BUSH WHITE HOUSE OVER GLOBAL WARMING 'FLIP-FLOP'
Drudge Report ^ | 6/3/02 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 06/03/2002 10:04:46 AM PDT by hchutch

Just the headline


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; drudge; limbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,341-1,348 next last
It seems to me that Matt wasn't quite listening here, appears to be one comment taken out of context.
1 posted on 06/03/2002 10:04:47 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hchutch
that's what I thought
2 posted on 06/03/2002 10:05:40 AM PDT by Kwilliams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
No one click the link, its spelled wrong and re-routes to a porn site.

-Eric

3 posted on 06/03/2002 10:07:05 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
What did rush say?
4 posted on 06/03/2002 10:07:05 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Well I just wonder though what Bush IS doing?
I mean it's getting so that I don't know where he stands on some of these things. If he's doing to hijack the demoRATS agenda, then I'll eat my shoes.
5 posted on 06/03/2002 10:07:41 AM PDT by BIOMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
My corp firewall will like that one. UGH. At least it filtered it and says NP ACCESS/ Porn content. haha
6 posted on 06/03/2002 10:07:43 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc; Admin Moderator
My mistake on a typo. Please change the URL in the link. My apologies.
7 posted on 06/03/2002 10:08:21 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
...its spelled wrong and re-routes to a porn site.

Hanky-Panky College is a porn site?
8 posted on 06/03/2002 10:10:35 AM PDT by wheezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I think the Bildebergers told W. to change his tune on global warming and VOILA presto change-o. That is my conspiracy theory for the day...... ;^)
9 posted on 06/03/2002 10:11:02 AM PDT by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I am thinking the same damn thing. WTF is Bush doing? I am totally PO'd at this crap.
10 posted on 06/03/2002 10:11:33 AM PDT by jbstrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
WTF...World "something" Federation????
11 posted on 06/03/2002 10:13:12 AM PDT by BIOMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Again, Drudge is jumping the gun. He has no scruples whatsoever. Rush hasn't ripped anyone. I am convinced Drudge is posting this crap to get a rise out of people the same way he carelessly posted pieces of the NYT article.
12 posted on 06/03/2002 10:13:44 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
You're lucky. One of the site's pop-ups uses that really obnoxious programming that takes the X off the usable screen.

So everyone knows, Alt-F4 will kill it or any other active window.

Death to pop-ups,
-Eric

13 posted on 06/03/2002 10:14:07 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN JUNE 02, 2002 18:04:09 ET XXXXX

U-TURN: BUSH ADMIN OUTLINES 'GLOBAL WARMING' EFFECTS ON AMERICA; ACKNOWLEDGES DAMAGE

In a stunning U-turn for the Bush administration, the United States has sent a climate report to the United Nations detailing "specific and far-reaching effects" that it says "global warming will inflict" on the American environment.

MORE
Also for the first time -- the White House places "most of the blame for recent global warming on human actions -- mainly the burning of fossil fuels that send heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere," the NEW YORK TIMES is planning to report on Monday Page Ones, according to publishing sources.

The United States will be substantially changed in the next few decades, claims the Bush report. The United States will "very likely" be seeing the "disruption of snow-fed water supplies, more stifling heat waves and the permanent disappearance of Rocky Mountain meadows and coastal marshes."

MORE
I say....
Rush thinks Bush is just doing this so that liberals won't have an issue to attack him on. Takes away the globull warming BS issue from Democrats if Bush goes along with them on it.... But it isn't any hotter here in Los Angeles than it was when we lived here in 1988-1990 and again in 1997. Same ole weather patterns we enjoyed back then are here today.

Plus they say it is hotter everywhere. I went to a website that claimed it is hotter all over Texas now that it was in 1945-46 and up through 1994. BS !!! It was hotter in 1980 and 1981 than it is in Lake Jackson, Texas (our other home) now! I remember 1980 cause I was in Europe month of May and came back to HOT spell from hell. Had first son, Gary in 1981 and I still remember how hot it was that summer.

One summer after we moved to Lake Jackson from Clute, Texas I remember it was so hot I hung curtains and sheets and room darkening shades on the windows to keep the heat out. I hung a towel over the front door window to keep the heat out. That was when Gary was in 6 grade. It has NEVER gotten that hot again in Lake Jackson.

But the stooopid sheeples just believe what ever the 'experts' tell them. sheeee-it. Gullible sheeples believe globull warming BS. I go check my thermometer in my backyard and the OFFICIAL temp that is reported for my town is often a lot higher than the reading on my own thermometer. I remember a couple of summers ago it was really cool all summer. The next summer it was hot in afternoon, but dry. The next summer it was normal again. We had floods in LJ in 1976, 1979, and again in early 1990s. Just cycles of climate and weather and moisture IMHO.

I believe it is all just natural cycles and man is arrogant to believe he is changing the climate of the world. Plus if the world heats up, or a species dies off, perhaps that is God's plan!!! Like when he changed the climate and killed the dinosaurs. And what caused the dust bowl of the 1930????? Not Man!

14 posted on 06/03/2002 10:14:58 AM PDT by buffyt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
BINGO!
15 posted on 06/03/2002 10:15:05 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BIOMAN
WTF is the less polite way of saying, "What the heck."
16 posted on 06/03/2002 10:15:12 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Well, I heard the Rush diatribe (it's probably still going on) and it was my impression that Druge got it right: Rush is ripping and ripping and ripping Bush a new one. Seems this goes on everyday.

It's not only annoying, it's boring. Please, Freepers, don't flame me as someone who won't countenance criticism of "our" president.

Of course I strongly believe Bush should be criticized whenever it's appropriate. However, Rush lately has launched out at the administration on tangents that simply are not well-founded; moreover, Rush has lost whatever skill he had at understanding the political zeitgeist and the political context.

I've had it with his show for now. He never has anything uplifting to say, just whining all the time. He is making O'Reilly look like the Sunshine Man.

17 posted on 06/03/2002 10:15:17 AM PDT by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I'd say that Rush and Drudge both have the intellect of a good 8th grade social studies student; that neither has read the actual report; and that both are making a knee jerk reaction. Maybe human activity *is* contributing to atmospheric warming. Maybe there is some good science on this. Maybe the administration has weighed the evidence and decided that this is a reasonable position to take.

To add one more thing, I'd say that Rush, since his hearing problem, has become extremely one-dimensional in his thinking. His analogies are continually flawed, he can't see the forest for the trees, and he overreacts to everything Bush does that he disagrees with. I tune him in rarely and am disappointed every time I do.

18 posted on 06/03/2002 10:15:29 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
I think Bush is appeasing the liberals till the 2002 election; he can't do anything till the obstructionists in the Senate are elected out. Hopefully Republicans will get back the Senate in 2002 and then I foresee Bush pushing his conservative agenda full force.
19 posted on 06/03/2002 10:15:30 AM PDT by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
Rush has lost whatever skill he had at understanding the political zeitgeist and the political context.

You said it more succinctly and effectively than I did.

20 posted on 06/03/2002 10:16:38 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,341-1,348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson