Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arm the Passengers
http://armedndangerous.blogspot.com/ ^ | 3 june 02 | Armed and Dangerous

Posted on 06/03/2002 7:41:14 AM PDT by white trash redneck

Arm the Passengers:

The recent controversy over arming airline pilots against a possible repetition of the 9/11 atrocity misses a crucial problem that makes arming pilots relatively ineffective: terrorists would know in advance where the guns are, and be able to game against that.

Let's say you are a terrorist executing a hijacking. You know the pilots are armed. Then here are your tactics -- you send the pilots a message that you will begin shooting cabin crew and passengers, one every five minutes, until the pilots throw their guns into the main cabin. Just to make sure, you split your gang into an A team and a B team. After the pilots have thrown out some guns, you send the A team into the cockpit. If the pilots resist, the B team kills more people.

Sky marshals can be taken out in a similar way. Your B team, armed with knives, breaks cover and announces the hijacking. The sky marshals (if there are any present; they're now flying on less than 1% of planes, and can't be trained fast enough for that figure to go up significantly in the foreseeable future) break cover. Now your A team, armed with guns, breaks cover and disposes of the sky marshals. Game over.

Anyone who thinks either scenario can be prevented by keeping firearms off-board should put down that crack pipe now. Tiger team exercises after 9/11 have repeatedly demonstrated that the new, improved airport security has had effectively zero impact on a determined bad-guy's ability to sneak weapons past checkpoints -- it's still easy. Despite government spin, there is no prospect this will change; the underlying problem is just too hard.

For terrorists to be effectively deterred, they need to face a conterthreat they cannot scope out in advance. That's why the right solution is to arm the passengers, not just the pilots.

Now, as a terrorist, you would be facing an unknown number of guns potentially pointed at you from all directions. Go ahead; take that flight attendant hostage. You can't use her to make people give up weapons neither you nor she knows they have. You have to assume you're outnumbered, and you dare not turn your back on anyone, because you don't know who might be packing.

The anti-gun bien pensants of the world wet their pants at the thought of flying airplanes containing hundreds of armed civilians. They would have you believe that this would be a sure recipe for carnage on every flight, an epidemic of berserk yahoos blowing bullet holes through innocent bystanders and the cabin walls. When you ask why this didn't happen before 1971 when there were no firearms restrictions on airplanes, they evade the question.

The worst realistic case from arming passengers is that some gang of terrorist pukes tries to bust a move anyway, and innocent bystanders get killed by stray bullets while the passengers are taking out the terrorists. That would be bad -- but, post-9/11, the major aim of air security can no longer be saving passenger lives. Instead, it has to be preventing the use of airplanes as weapons of mass destruction. Thus: we should arm the passengers to save the lives of thousands more bystanders on the ground.

And, about that stray-bullet thing. Airplanes aren't balloons. They don't pop when you put a round through the fuselage. A handful of bullet holes simply cannot leak air fast enough to be dangerous; there would be plenty of time to drop the plane into the troposphere. To sidestep the problem, encourage air travelers to carry fragmenting ammunition like Glaser rounds.

Think of it. No more mile-long security lines, no more obnoxious baggage searches, no more women getting groped by bored security guards, no more police-state requirement that you show an ID before boarding, no more flimsy plastic tableware. Simpler, safer, faster air travel with a bullet through the head reserved for terrorists.

Extending this lesson to other circumstances, like when we're not surrounded by a fuselage, is left as an exercise for the reader...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; security; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: bang_list
bang
21 posted on 06/03/2002 9:36:17 AM PDT by MissTargets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTargets
Why is it everyone forgets our military? Airlines should run full page ads saying:

" All armed U. S. Military members fly free -- Show us your loaded weapon at the ticket counter."

22 posted on 06/03/2002 9:43:57 AM PDT by Crowcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
I still think the safest and best option is to give every passenger a fully charged tazer as they come aboard. I do not think very many people are up to facing down 200+ armed passengers.
23 posted on 06/03/2002 9:48:05 AM PDT by eFudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Forty_two
I wanna carry this on my next flight!

Fine by me. I'll be happy with just a little singleshot:


25 posted on 06/03/2002 10:32:23 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy
Okay, so you insulted both.
26 posted on 06/03/2002 10:47:42 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Too Logical. It'll NEVER happen! Will you please stop making sense!!
27 posted on 06/03/2002 10:49:10 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crowcreek
Military are not allowed to take issue weapons home. While many of them think themselves well trained, their pitiful lack of skill at arms becomes apparent when they try for a concealed carry permit. There are exceptions to this statement but sadly too few exceptions.
28 posted on 06/03/2002 11:21:09 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Love the 2nd ammendment but how long would it be before a gun-toting passenger got irritated at the yahoo that put his seat back to far spilling coke on the gun-packing passenger... think air rage, similar to road rage. The guns would inevitably get misused. The liberal media would have a field day upon the first instance.

"An Armed Society is a Polite Society". Contrast N.Y.C. to Miami, FL. We all know how drivers act in N.Y. In Miami, folks are a bit calmer because most drivers are armed. Those of us that carry are not goofy gun slingers with derringers and .22 pocket pistols. The overwhelming majority of us own state of the art weapons and are trained to a much higher degree than law enforcement. In fact, I was speaking to a local cop and they were limited to 100 rounds per month for practice and the department was complaining about that. I order ammo in 1000 round cases every month or so. A fellow CCW friend and I were laughing at the Air Marshal qualification shooting test, pretty simple by our shooting standards. Furthermore, I've been through no less than 3 FBI background checks in maintaining my CCW permit, few airport employees have been through such screening. In addition, I, by birthright as an American, am deputized to defend my life & liberty and the only difference between me and a LEO, is that I am not paid so I do not have a DUTY to uphold the law.

29 posted on 06/03/2002 12:46:26 PM PDT by chuknospam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Air Marshal Shooting Qualification Test
Sorry, I haven't got the knack of getting tabbed columns to work out.

All of the shot stages below are performed at seven yards.
Individual Stage:: Start Position:: Time Allowed:: Total Rounds

1 Round (2X):: From concealed holster:: 1.65 sec (3.30 total):: 2

Double Tap (2X):: Low Ready:: 1.35 sec (2.70 total:: 4

Rhythm::; shoot 6 rounds at 1 target;
no more than 0.6 second
between any shot.
Low Ready:: 3.00 sec:: 6

1 Shot, speed
reload, 1 shot (2X):: Low Ready:: 3.25 sec (6.50 total):: 4

One Round each
at two targets three
yards apart (2X):: Low Ready:: 1.65 sec (3.30 total):: 4

180° pivot. One
round at each of
3 targets (2X).
Turn left, then
right.:: From concealed holster:: 3.50 sec (7.00 total):: 6

1 Round; to
slide lock; drop
to one knee;
reload; fire
1 round. (2X):: Low Ready:: 4.00 sec (8.00 total):: 4

Qualification details:

1. Time: Cannot exceed total time for each drill. Example: Drill #1 - 1st time 1.70 seconds, 2nd time 1.55 seconds; Total = 3.25 seconds =Go.
Must achieve a "GO" on each drill stage.

2. Accuracy: Target is FBI "QIT" (bottle). Total rounds fired is 30.
Point value inside bottle = 5. Point value touching line or outside bottle= 2. Maximum possible score = 150. Minimum qualifying score = 135.

3. All stages are shot "cold"-- with no warm-up or practice. Come to the range, walk to the targets and begin the stages.
All stages must equal "GO" to qualify. If you don't qualify, you don't fly!

30 posted on 06/03/2002 1:40:34 PM PDT by chuknospam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

31 posted on 06/03/2002 2:33:00 PM PDT by Musket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Musket
Them passengers need to be kneeling. Can't always rely on the perp to stop the slug!
32 posted on 06/04/2002 4:39:22 AM PDT by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons
Dear Widow, I suppose you would feel better if the terrorists crashed the plane into the Super Bowl and killed 50,000 more people than were on the airplane?
33 posted on 06/04/2002 5:07:43 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flint
You didn't read my words. If the terrorists couldn't get into the cockpit, how could they crash the plane?
34 posted on 06/04/2002 9:01:41 AM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Bats. Issue every passenger a bat.

I've thought from the beginning that putting a billy club in the pocket with the plane diagram, magazine, overpriced catalog, and barf bag would do ten times more for security than anything that's actually been done.

35 posted on 06/04/2002 9:07:26 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eFudd
I still think the safest and best option is to give every passenger a fully charged tazer as they come aboard.

Oh, yeah, a device that generates a massive electrical discharge is just the thing to have on an airplane....

36 posted on 06/04/2002 9:10:36 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
An armed society is a polite society.
37 posted on 06/04/2002 9:12:21 AM PDT by eFudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
It sounds rediculous, but the funny thing is... it would work. Somehow need to keep them out of the hands of four year olds, though. That would be a problem.
38 posted on 06/04/2002 9:38:26 AM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: packrat01
Can't always rely on the perp to stop the slug!

What good are they, then? You just can can't get reliable perps these days; just don't make 'em like they used to. What's the world coming to?

AB

40 posted on 06/05/2002 9:56:41 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson