Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate Action Report 2002(NYT's Bush's U-Turn report)
US. EPA Global Warming ^ | May 2002 | Various EPA studies

Posted on 06/02/2002 7:46:20 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander

The United States of America's Third National
Communication Under the United Nations 
Framework Convention on Climate Change


FINAL VERSION
Hard copies of this report will not be published for several months. Ordering information will be available on this page once copies are available.


(Per Federal Register Notice)

(Public Comments Submitted)


Get Acrobat ReaderAll files listed in the Table of Contents are available for viewing or download in Adobe Acrobat 5.0 format. The Acrobat Reader is available at no cost from Adobe Systems.Exit EPA


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Zip file of pdf containing entire document (5.7M)

Upfront (247k pdf)  – Cover page and table of contents.

Chapter 1.  Introduction and Overview (197k pdf) – Summarizes the main elements of the report.

Chapter 2.  National Circumstances (450k pdf) – Presents a snapshot of the national characteristics of the United States that play a role in climate change, including the country's climate, geography, economy, demographic trends, energy production and consumption, and natural resources.

Chapter 3.  Greenhouse Gas Inventory (442k pdf) – Provides a broad overview of all U.S. greenhouse gas emission sources and sinks, introduces key concepts, and discusses the primary drivers for the growth in emissions.  All material in the chapter is drawn from the U.S. Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:  1990–1999

Chapter 4.  Policies and Measures (320k pdf) – Reviews national policies to limit emissions and enhance sinks of greenhouse gases undertaken since 1990.

Chapter 5.  Projections (322k pdf) – Quantifies the aggregate effects on greenhouse gas emissions of policies and measures implemented or planned from 1990 to 2020.

Chapter 6.  Vulnerability (1.5M pdf) – Addresses U.S. vulnerabilities to the adverse consequences of climate change and identifies the most promising adaptation measures being explored.

Chapter 7.  Financial Resources (426k pdf) – Reviews U.S. efforts with other countries to assist with mitigation and sequestration strategies, build human and institutional capacity to address climate change, and facilitate the commercial transfer of technology.

Chapter 8.  Research and Observation (296k pdf) – Discusses research efforts involving prediction of climate change, impacts and adaptation, and mitigation and new technologies.  This chapter also provides an overview of U.S. work on Global Climate Observing Systems.Exit EPA

Chapter 9.  Education, Training, and Awareness (269k pdf) – Addresses programs to educate and train students and citizens in areas related to climate change and reviews U.S. outreach activities to disseminate information about global climate change.

Appendix A:  Emission Trends. (1.9M pdf)

Appendix B:  Policies and Measures. (1.5M pdf)

Appendix C:  Selected Technology Transfer Activities and U.S. Direct Financial Contributions and Commercial Sales Related to Implementation of the UNFCCC. (4.4M pdf)

Appendix D:  Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions. (264k pdf)

Appendix E:  Bibliography. (197k pdf)


http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming/nwinsite.html
http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming/actions/national/index.html
http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming/publications/index.html



TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climatechange; drudgegas; globalwarming; greenhousegas; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: Lazamataz
I wasn't talking about you. I mean it's very fashionable for people who are our enemies to do this; even the enemies among us. How many times have we seen this now, an article, a rage/rant thread, and lo and behold, it comes out that it's been completely misconstrued.

You have to ask yourself, what are the people who contort these things getting from it. Ratings? Money? Attention?

121 posted on 06/03/2002 8:52:50 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: rintense
It's time to start kicking butt and taking names. I'm reminded of the one press conference not too long ago where GWB pretty much b!tch-slapped all the reporters. He needs to do that on a more regular basis.

Yeah, has dissing the press made Rummy unpopular?

Way too many hand-wringers in the GOP. They're like the ten of the twelve spies Moses sent into the Promised Land who came back too scared to fight.




122 posted on 06/03/2002 8:53:27 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What's a Robert Wright?
123 posted on 06/03/2002 8:53:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
BTTT
124 posted on 06/03/2002 8:54:47 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Ahem.

One of the affects of this is that the early morning talk show hosts picked this up and were going hysterical...at least that is what I heard here this morning. Now a lot of people with no internet access will be going ballistic, either because they think there IS global warming or because they think "Bush caved."

Please tell me again why I should believe anything Drudge says.

I have said this since the campaign: Drudge is not our friend.

125 posted on 06/03/2002 8:55:09 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Please tell me again why I should believe anything Drudge says.

I am greatly disappointed with Drudge as well.

126 posted on 06/03/2002 8:57:11 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Yet another brilliant Bush secret plan, huh? Well he's either far better than I expected, or far worse than I feared, that's fer shure.
127 posted on 06/03/2002 8:58:59 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
In 1977 snow fell in Fort Lauderdale. Not a lot, but snow. Weather patterns change. In the middle ages it was colder than it is now. It will continue to warm up and then it will begin to cool down. It is nature! Nothing any of these idiots do will change weather patterns now or ever.
128 posted on 06/03/2002 9:00:00 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Miss Marple
The test will be if Rush or Hannity goes nuts. Someone please post any details of their shows for those of us stuck in cubicles.
129 posted on 06/03/2002 9:00:08 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
He's an FBI agent who had a book he wanted to publish.....it got turned down....now he's making all kinds of wild claims, per van Sandt.
130 posted on 06/03/2002 9:01:08 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
What do you mean "Not Really Bush"? He is the President isn't he? He calls the shots doesn't he? Powell works for him doesn't he?
131 posted on 06/03/2002 9:04:02 AM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Then we have the most incompetent adminstration on history. This is a very big change, things like this don't get slipped out by a low level functionary. It is sort of like everyone blaming Powell for everything that this administration does that we don't like. Bush is in control, at the top, our pres. Kudos and blame belong squarely at the top, just like with the previous idiot we had for a president.
132 posted on 06/03/2002 9:04:32 AM PDT by proud to be breathing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: proud to be breathing
You need to read the report. As Nick said, it has been on the government web site for a week. There is nothing in this for people to get in an uproar about.
133 posted on 06/03/2002 9:08:13 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
This guy Robert Wright worked for the FBI from 1993-94, but he has a road map to 9/11? HORSE HOCKEY, he is a RAT SHILL period.
134 posted on 06/03/2002 9:08:45 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Rush is already reading letters from listeners who have gone off WITHOUT reading the entire EPA report... here we go...
135 posted on 06/03/2002 9:14:45 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: baxter999
WHO are you going to relpace him with?
136 posted on 06/03/2002 9:19:17 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I don't get Rush until 1PM here...it is on tape delay.

Unfortunately (or fortunately) I will be in a meeting at that time.

Let me know what is going on if you hear anything.

137 posted on 06/03/2002 9:19:28 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
So far, Rush is being level headed and saying that there is nothing U-Turnish about this report. He pointed out that the document basically states that even though there may be affects from human causes, there is nothing we can do about it now. It haas been done, and any changes we 'try' will not change what has occured.
138 posted on 06/03/2002 9:21:50 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: proud to be breathing; Nick Danger
This is a very big change, things like this don't get slipped out by a low level functionary. It is sort of like everyone blaming Powell for everything that this administration does that we don't like. Bush is in control, at the top, our pres. Kudos and blame belong squarely at the top, just like with the previous idiot we had for a president.

Is it a big change? Nick danger is suggesting that the media is picking and choosing controversial passages to present. Somehow I doubt every government-issued report gets read by the White House, unless there's a major policy shift. I can imagine a scenario where the State Dept. basically changed a few numbers and republished an existing report.

139 posted on 06/03/2002 9:21:57 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Well, I can't figure out what he's saying. In one breath, he's saying the report isn't devestating, and in another breath, he's saying that Dubya has 'caved' and taken another issue from the Dems.
140 posted on 06/03/2002 9:39:55 AM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson