[Ordinary_American]

Clift is a shill for far left-wing Democrats like Hillary.

[backhoe]

"Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel safer yet?"

Lest Americans ever forget why the clintons, and all their enablers need to be hectored, hounded, and harried into silence, until "clintonese is only spoken in Hell," look here:

Hodgepodge O' Hillary

The Holiday *Best* of Bill Clinton & his Friends!

-Some old strange clinton "stuff"--

To find all articles tagged or indexed using clintonscandals, click below:
	click here >>>	clintonscandals	<<< click here
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Hillary, click below:
	click here >>>	Hillary	<<< click here
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

[MeekOneGOP]

Ahhhhhhhhhhh ! !

[cardinal4]

I think with the liberals trying to blame Bush for 9/11 and having it thrown back at them,the public will see what Hillary's really about.She was the only one not to back pedal. She'll get hers.

[boomop1]

Looks like prune face got her talking points from the Hitlary camp, the witch is the center of evil if anything.

[abclily]

Miss Hitlery is not through with her goal of destroying this nation. She is a viper just waiting for her chance to do damage.

[Free_at_last_-2001]

Mainstream media live on the extreme left so when the have an extreme left candidate it appears central and when they have a central candidate it appears extreme right to them.

Solution: ignore mainstream media they will go away!

[Samwise]

Shortly into her first term as co-President, Hildebeest appeared on one of the morning shows. When she was asked how it felt to wake up in the White House as First Lady, she responded that she and Bill pulled the covers down, sat up in bed, looked at each other, and said, "We pulled it off!"

At the time I didn't realize she was the She-Beest. Even then, this struck me as quite an odd thing to say. All these years later, I understand what she meant.

Let's pray that she doesn't pull this one off.

[jabonz]

As John McLaughlin says: "BYE BYE!"

[MeekOneGOP]

Vote for Me in 2008!

[Right_in_Virginia]

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a frightening power hungry communist.

She should NEVER be underestimated.

[TheRedSoxWinThePennant]

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU DONT YOU KNOW ITS SUNDAY MORNING BREAKFAST TIME OR SHOULD I SAY WAS BREAKFAST TIME NOW I AM SEARCHING FOR IV FLUIDS TO REHYDRATE ME AFTER MY COPIUS AMOUNTS OF VOMITING

[cgbg]

Clift is a shill

That woman's face on television is a barf alert all by itself (pick one--Clift or Hillary ;-) ).

Clift thinks the Socialist Workers party is centrist. In her political spectrum the left wing has been cut off the bird.

If you can stand to look at the witch Clift for more than a nanosecond you will notice that her facial expression is a vicious hatred of all that is good in this world.

She--and Hillary--are the enemies of civilization. For each to be so prominent in public life is a frightening development that bodes ill for the futures of generations to come.

[RonDog]

From http://www.msnbc.com/news/760135.asp:

Whither Hillary?

The former First Lady is positioning herself as a showy centrist for Campaign 2008. But the Republicans also have their favorites waiting in the wings

NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE

May 31 —  All politics is personal. Nobody knows that better than Hillary Clinton, whom voters seem to either love or hate depending on her latest hairdo or karma with her husband.

HILLARY REMAINS resolutely opaque on the subject of her future ambition. Neutral observers give her high marks for the way she has blended into the Senate’s clubby culture, even joining conservative Republicans in a weekly prayer group. The junior senator for New York has never been the wild-eyed liberal her critics imagine, but she must have squirmed just a bit when protesters showed up outside her Washington home in late May objecting to her support for a Republican-backed welfare bill.

The former First Lady’s makeover as a political centrist dates back to the shellacking she took as the architect of the health-care plan that almost sank the Clinton presidency. Her acquiescence to punitive welfare rules on poor women is analogous to her husband’s capitulation to his political advisors in 1996, when he signed the original welfare-reform bill that the Republican-controlled House has now voted five years later to toughen. Senator Clinton claimed in a letter to the editor of The New York Times earlier this month that she backs the bill because her intention is to try to improve some of its provisions, like making more money available for child care for mothers required to work more hours.
        But the political calculation is transparent, and it may pay off. Hillary is establishing her bona fides as a centrist, which is where elections are won when the country is as divided between the two main parties as we are today. She rebuffs all talk about a presidential run for now and is focused on New York. But watch what she does, not what she says. This is a woman who knows how to keep her options open, and she’s doing it very well.

        The likely scenario for 2004 is that President Bush will win re-election. Americans don’t like to change presidents in the middle of war. And you can be sure the war against terrorism will be ongoing, as the Bush administration defines it, until at least election day in 2004. Even if we go a full three years without another attack, Bush will say it doesn’t mean a thing—and who’s to say he’s wrong?
        President Clinton is telling friends that Al Gore has a 60 percent chance of winning the nomination in 2004. The likely path for Democrats is that Gore runs again, probably teamed with Sen. Joe Lieberman, on a “We wuz robbed” ticket. Unless Sen. John McCain jumps in the race as an independent and scrambles the numbers, Gore will lose.

Looking ahead to 2008 is therapy for Democrats. “Will Rudy [Giuliani, the former New York mayor] run against Hillary ?” muses a Democratic pollster. “Only if Rudy makes up with W,” he concludes. “Otherwise Bush will block him.” Speculating about a race six years out may be foolish given the vagaries of politics, but it’s such fun. The three biggest GOP stars are McCain, Giuliani and Secretary of State Colin Powell. Each, however, has crossed swords with Bush either personally or ideologically. The successors Bush might prefer, Vice President Dick Cheney or Homeland Security tsar Tom Ridge, are not credible contenders; Cheney because of his health, Ridge because he’s been a dud on TV.
        Bush might once have looked to Powell, but their dissonance on hot-button issues like the Middle East and a missile-defense shield have eroded Powell’s popularity with the Bushies. Powell may be a huge hero to everybody in the country, but to Bush’s brain trust, namely Cheney and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, he is a staff officer. They knew him when he was a lieutenant colonel and those hierarchical relationships get set in stone. For his part, Powell is extremely respectful of the chain of command. A Democrat who served in the Carter administration regrets that President Carter didn’t discover Powell when he was just beginning his rise through the ranks. “He’s the guy you dream about,” says this former official. “How could we have let him slip through the net?”
        Powell voted Democratic at least through the 1964 election of Lyndon Johnson, and who knows after that. On social issues, he appears to favor the Democrats. But Republicans gave him his breaks, and he is Republican more by circumstance than inclination. He’s an unlikely future candidate for the GOP because the party’s foot soldiers don’t regard Powell as a real Republican.
        The country loves Powell, but Bush doesn’t. That doesn’t mean that Powell will quit in disgust or disagreement. Friends who know him say that will never happen. One, he’s a military officer trained to be loyal. And two, as an African-American, he’s very aware he’s carrying a unique historical legacy. He’ll never quit, but he won’t have a second term after the election. “He’s a one-term secretary of State even if Bush wins a second term, and even if Cheney leaves,” says a former ambassador who has worked closely with Powell. And there’s only one person who Bush can replace Powell with, and that’s national-security adviser Condoleezza Rice.
        Aside from her race, which would soften the blow of losing Powell, she is the natural successor to the job. There are enough historical precedents that if Bush didn’t promote her, he would be criticized—and deservedly so. Her critics see lapses in her expertise on non-Russian issues and aren’t sure where she stands, if anywhere, on some of the big strategic questions such as the Middle East. But her skills in presenting the administration’s message and staying cool under fire are unsurpassed. “She’s their surrogate daughter,” says a former Clinton official. “They love her, and she’s given her life to them.”
        Imagining Rice as the next secretary of State makes Democrats crazy. Not that they don’t think she can do the job. But Clinton made so much of the fact that he was appointing the first woman to the job with Madeleine Albright, having Bush trump him is hard to take. Still, the Clintons have a few cards left to play as well, which is what Hillary’s showy centrism can do: get her ready for 2008.
       
       © 2002 Newsweek, Inc.

[tcostell]

Hillary the Centrist Presidential Candidate

What country is she going to run in? Cuba or maybe one of those forward looking african nations?

[NYer]

Noticeably absent - HRC (can't bring myself to write her name). Intentional ..... ???????

[JZoback]

The article reads like a gossip column, yet it's under the opinion section.

Clift is drinking some heavy duty Kool-aid again

[MadIvan]

What Clift and her puppetmaster Her Evilness fail to notice is that they belong to a coterie of liberal women who are just going to rub the nation the wrong way. Another good example is Susan Estrich; I love the fact that Fox News now broadcasts over here, but dear GOD, when she was on there yesterday I nearly put a rock through my telly just to shut her up. Hillary and Eleanor are the same way - the smug, condescending socialism of a nanny elite, the "it takes a village" variety of noblesse oblige, the "L'etat c'est moi" brand of Democrat politics has a limited audience, namely those who cannot be bothered to think or fend for themselves.

Unfortunately, these people existed in enough of a concentration in the New York area to get the First Bitch elected to the Senate, but there are insufficient numbers in the country as a whole to give her anything more.

Regards, Ivan

[Solid Oak]

She will find a way to run in 2004....that's why Clinton's hand picked man is running the DNC.

[reg45]

I learned long ago to "Never trust anyone named Eleanor!".

[Piquaboy]

If she is a centrist, I am the King of England.