Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condoleezza Rice Warned Sept. 6 on Imminent Terror Attack
NewsMax.com ^ | May 29, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 05/29/2002 11:29:43 AM PDT by Carl/NewsMax

Five days before Sept. 11, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice was warned that a terrorist attack inside the United States was imminent, a former U.S. Senator who headed up a blue ribbon commission on terrorism revealed late Tuesday.

"I've known the national security advisor, Professor Rice, for about 20 some years," former Colorado Sen. Gary Hart told WABC Radio's John Batchelor and Paul Alexander. "She was a supporter of mine in my first presidential campaign as a graduate student in Denver."

After giving a speech on the terrorist threat in Montreal on Sept. 5, Hart said he requested an urgent meeting with Dr. Rice in Washington.

"I said to her, 'You must move more quickly on homeland security. An attack is going to happen.'

"That was Sept. 6, 2001," Hart told WABC, without characterizing Dr. Rice's reaction.

The night before, Hart said, he issued the same warning to an air transportation group in Canada.

Three years ago Hart and former New Hampshire Sen. Warren Rudman co-chaired the U.S. Commission on National Security for the 21st Century, which warned specifically of a domestic terrorist attack.

In a Sept. 15, 1999 report the Hart-Rudman Commission concluded, "America will be attacked by terrorists using weapons of mass destruction and Americans will lose their lives on American soil, possibly in large numbers."


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 911warning; bushknew; hart; rice; senmonkeybusiness; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: VOA
"I wonder if Hart was the source of the warning to "not fly" that was given to San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown. (IIRC, Willie got that warning a day or so before 9-11; but I don't think the source was named in the newspaper report I saw.)"

I remember this too. Was there any investigation into how Brown got the warning and why the people on the 4 planes didn't?

41 posted on 05/29/2002 12:34:43 PM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Leave it to NewsMax to use this incendiary headline.......

Pitiful!

42 posted on 05/29/2002 12:37:04 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Are planes now considered to be "Weapons of Mass Destruction"?

The other option is that it is the high rise office towers that are weapons of mass destruction!

Personally this all sounds like Monkey Business to me.

43 posted on 05/29/2002 12:37:29 PM PDT by DrDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Digger
Guilt was all over it. I can spot it like grass stains on a new pair of white pants. She should resign but those odds are higher than a winning lotto ticket.

Oh are you now trying to start to bash Condi?

44 posted on 05/29/2002 12:41:08 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Howdy!

45 posted on 05/29/2002 12:41:23 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal
Was there any investigation into how Brown got the warning and why the people on the 4 planes didn't?

I haven't heard of any; but I am in Southern California.
Seeing how we hear about the Pro-Palestinian protests in the Bay Area fairly often
(including the bru-ha-ha over the 11-year old girl who got arrested for assault on a cop),
maybe one of Hiz-zonor's Palestinian-American or Muslim-American constituents just couldn't
let Willie get splatted.
46 posted on 05/29/2002 12:41:30 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Can't somebody post the photographs of the other Ms. Rice on the former Senator's lap? This will provide needed context for his remarks.
47 posted on 05/29/2002 12:41:52 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette; weegee
From a Washington Post story on Dr. Rice:

Rice herself voted for a Democrat in the first presidential election in which she was eligible, casting her ballot for Jimmy Carter in 1976. She voted for Republican Ronald Reagan in 1980, largely out of distress with what she considered naive statements by Carter about the Soviet Union. In 1984 Hart's farsighted military reform agenda attracted her, although by then, [fellow foreign policy scholar at Stanford University, Coit] Blacker says, it was clear to him, from joint appearances on arms control panels, that she was "more comfortable" in the Republican Party.

It was also clear to another Stanford colleague, Russia expert Michael McFaul, who remembers Rice telling him she opposed gun control and even gun registration because Bull Connor could have used it to disarm her father and others who patrolled Titusville in 1963. "For me as a liberal, pro-gun control person, it really hit me over the head," McFaul says. "I remember thinking, 'Who are we as white liberals to respond?' "

Rice says it was the issue of race that repelled her from the Democratic Party for good – for reasons that echo the lessons she draws from her family narrative. She remembers watching the 1984 Democratic National Convention that nominated Walter Mondale for president, and recoiling at what seemed to her an endless refrain of appeals to "women, minorities and the poor, which basically means helpless people and the poor."

"If I heard it one more time!" she says, still fuming. "I decided I'd rather be ignored than patronized."

In 1988, Rice received a call from Madeleine Albright, her mentor's daughter, suggesting they work together on Democrat Michael Dukakis's presidential campaign. The two women had never met, but Albright says she knew of Rice's bond with Albright's refugee father, who was an impassioned believer in government's responsibility to right society's wrongs, and assumed from that – and Rice's roots in segregated Birmingham – that she was a Democrat.

Albright remembers the uncomfortable silence. "Madeleine, I don't know how to tell you this," Rice finally answered. "I'm a Republican."

48 posted on 05/29/2002 12:42:29 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Gary Hart knows about lap-dances. I wouldn't consider his thoughts on any other subject in the universe as worth even that proverbial grain of salt.
49 posted on 05/29/2002 12:44:07 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Sound like someone is trying to use the old CYA technique. Now, 8 months after the fact, the story comes out.
50 posted on 05/29/2002 12:45:03 PM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger
Dr. Rice and the GOP
51 posted on 05/29/2002 12:47:43 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Actually, the term was used in the January 31, 2001 report issued by the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. This was the the last of a series of three reports issued by this group over a period of two years. In this final report they recommend the creation of a "National Homeland Security Agency". In fact, after September 11, it was this group's work that was used as a model for the mechanisms that were set up. A copy of the report can be found here: http://www.cfr.org/Public/media/attack_links.html

Now, some of you reading this may have noticed that the URL above is from the Council on Foreign Relations. Interestly enough, the commission that issued the report was first suggested by Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich, both CFR members, and implemented by Bill Cohen, also a CFR member. The two chairs, Rudman and Hart, are (yes, you guessed it) CFR members. As if that is not enough, there were ten commissioners and, here it comes, each and everyone is a CFR member. So, what you have is a situation where are new National Security policy (including the Patriot Act) is basically a product of the Council on Foreign Relations. You may be saying at this point, "So what? That is tinfoil hat stuff." Maybe, maybe not. Might be worth checking out, though, given their influence.

One more thing: Rice, Powell and Cheney are also CFR members. In fact, every Secretary of State since WWII has been a member of CFR.

52 posted on 05/29/2002 12:48:02 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He's upset because he knows Condi will be the first black president, I bet-- or else he's a tin-foil hatter.
53 posted on 05/29/2002 12:49:09 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
So then why didn't GARY do more? If he knew it was so close why wasn't he doing more to try and stop it himself? A vauge 'something bad is going to happen sometime, somewhere' is useless, if he knew something specific and actionable, why wasn't he yelling and screaming to the press about it to the press everyday from Sept 6th onward?
54 posted on 05/29/2002 12:50:21 PM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Most likely both
55 posted on 05/29/2002 12:58:44 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette
Geeze....So was Liddy Dole..Cheerleader for LBJ....
56 posted on 05/29/2002 1:03:55 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P7M13
ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzing!

He shoots and SCORES!

57 posted on 05/29/2002 1:09:33 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Hart's comments on September 12, 2001, are very interesting. They were made at a meeting of the Council on Foreign Relations. You can listen at www.defendersoffreedom.org/videos/videos.htm. Click on 9-11 The Road to Tyranny and go about 24 minutes into the clip. Something about using this tragedy to usher in the New World Order.
58 posted on 05/29/2002 1:14:21 PM PDT by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax; OldFriend
Agree with you, OldFriend.

What a pitiful headline grab attempt!

Gary Hart tells Condoleza Rice to speed up efforts on "Homeland security"???? on Sept. 6????

What did he tell Bill Clinton from 1999 on???? Why didn't Bill Clinton respond? (we know why, of course - because Clinton is himself a terrorist of the first order and was too busy terrorizing his domestic "enemies".....)

But this point seems to be omitted by the monkey business maker Hart.

And, I was thinking about subscribing to some of the Newsmax offerings - because I like Gary Aldrich and admire his courage. After this - and after a LOT of things like this, guess not. Sheesh. GET REAL, NEWSMAX!!!! We are in a war for crying out loud - and YOU are siding with those who want us dead! by printing these incindiary headlines!!!

59 posted on 05/29/2002 1:14:52 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nancie Drew
In case you missed it, see my post #52 above.
60 posted on 05/29/2002 1:20:43 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson