Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2002 9:37:25 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NativeNewYorker;EdReform;mommadooo3;JeanS
Originally posted last August, re-posted here in the new FR arrangement; F.Y.I.
2 posted on 05/28/2002 9:38:31 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
Student Scores Lower for States That Spent the Most

and

More Money Urged

Kind of says it all.
3 posted on 05/28/2002 9:43:40 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
Democrats and other supporters of higher spending said the comparison is useless because in most high scoring states, the SAT is only taken by the very best students. They said the states that spend the most tend to be the urban northeast states, which must work with diverse populations, students who speak English as a second language, and students from low income homes.

Excuses, nothing but effing excuses for their collossal failures. The liberal education establishment has a leather jack boot on the necks of of those in public "skools"; which are namely minority. There is tons of data which show that spending does not lead to better education, but rather simple values such as discipline, community, curriculum, and family involvement lead to better education.

5 posted on 05/28/2002 9:47:52 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
This is no surprise. States like Utah, North Dakota, et cetera, have comparatively few minorities. That's why their scores are higher. It has nothing to do with money. As for why minorities score consistently lower on all educational tests across the board, that's a topic for another time. One thing is for certain -- while the SAT may in fact be a culturally biased test, no educational organization has devised a test in which minorities (except for Asians) score higher, or even equal to, Caucasians.
6 posted on 05/28/2002 9:57:02 AM PDT by Mister Magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
"These are the poorest, most disadvantaged kids'' who often drop out of high school, the Georgia Republican said.

No one is forced to drop out of high school. Kids either make a choice to drop out of high school or have made choices (such as getting pregnant, 100% preventable) that lead to them dropping out of school.

Their choices KEEP them poor and disadvantaged.
11 posted on 05/28/2002 10:12:23 AM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
Our RINO governor here in Tennessee has proposed that if we just give him an additional $100 MILLION PER YEAR, that the schools would actually start teaching the children to read. He seems completelly oblivious to the fact that if the schools aren't providing something as basic as reading education, that giving them more money isn't going to help them.
13 posted on 05/28/2002 10:26:46 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute




17 posted on 05/28/2002 10:42:42 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute;*Education News
"Many Democrats, backed by representatives of teachers and school administrators... "

That'd be unions, as in the National Education Association. Get the NEA out of public education, and you just might see some improvement in the schools.

Help defund the National Education Association

18 posted on 05/28/2002 10:44:21 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
Great post, and one of the NEA's dirty little secrets. Although low-spending states have some of the highest scores and vice versa, the negative correlation between per pupil spending and SAT score is actually pretty weak -- if you plot it up, it looks like a shotgun pattern. Spending more or less doesn't seem to make much difference.

The NEA's complaint that one can't compare SAT scores is a red herring. The fact is that spending per pupil is demonstrably uncorrelated to virtually any measure of educational performance. I pulled the numbers below mostly ffrom the NEA's own website. The dollars per teacher data are for 1993. The rest are 1995. "% Fed $" is the federal contribution to the state's education budget. For fun, try copying the statistics into your favorite spreadsheet, making some charts, and showing the results to your favorite liberal!

(Be sure to plot $/Teacher versus $/Pupil. The only significant thing coming from higher per pupil spending seems be to raise teacher salaries.)

State SAT Pupils/teacher $/Teacher $/Pupil % Fed $ Grad %
United States 910.00 17.40 35027.00 5421.00 71.2
Alabama 1029.00 17.40 26953.00 3616.00 52.88 66.10
Alaska 934.00 16.80 46019.00 8450.00 50.28 74.10
Arizona 944.00 18.70 31352.00 4381.00 45.47 72.70
Arkansas 1005.00 17.00 27433.00 4031.00 52.21 78.30
California 902.00 24.10 40035.00 4746.00 38.89 68.60
Colorado 980.00 18.30 33541.00 5172.00 39.03 75.10
Connecticut 908.00 14.30 48343.00 8017.00 32.26 80.40
Delaware 897.00 16.70 36217.00 6093.00 31.31 69.60
District of Columbia 857.00 13.30 38702.00 9549.00 81.88 62.80
Florida 889.00 18.40 31172.00 5243.00 50.53 65.00
Georgia 854.00 18.00 30051.00 4375.00 37.51 63.70
Hawaii 889.00 17.60 36470.00 5420.00 52.09 78.10
Idaho 979.00 19.60 27011.00 3556.00 48.75 81.10
Illinois 1048.00 16.80 38632.00 5670.00 30.85 78.60
Indiana 882.00 17.60 35066.00 5074.00 33.03 76.00
Iowa 1099.00 15.80 30130.00 5096.00 43.03 87.60
Kansas 1060.00 15.20 32863.00 5007.00 44.87 80.50
Kentucky 999.00 17.30 31115.00 4719.00 53.53 69.80
Louisiana 1021.00 16.60 27617.00 4354.00 54.49 52.90
Maine 896.00 14.10 30250.00 5652.00 53.57 81.10
Maryland 909.00 16.90 38753.00 6679.00 58.96 76.10
Massachusetts 907.00 15.00 38223.00 6408.00 38.01 79.10
Michigan 1033.00 19.50 43604.00 6268.00 30.74 70.90
Minnesota 1085.00 17.60 35093.00 5409.00 29.95 89.20
Mississippi 1036.00 18.20 24367.00 3245.00 63.90 62.10
Missouri 1045.00 16.20 29382.00 4830.00 49.96 73.20
Montana 1009.00 15.80 27617.00 5423.00 69.04 85.50
Nebraska 1050.00 14.60 28768.00 5263.00 43.29 87.20
Nevada 917.00 18.70 34119.00 4926.00 31.71 70.70
New Hampshire 935.00 15.60 33931.00 5790.00 34.59 78.10
New Jersey 898.00 13.60 42680.00 9317.00 31.05 84.10
New Mexico 1015.00 17.60 26532.00 3765.00 77.10 67.80
New York 892.00 15.20 44999.00 8527.00 34.69 66.60
North Carolina 865.00 16.70 29315.00 4555.00 36.61 68.50
North Dakota 1107.00 15.20 25211.00 4441.00 65.25 87.50
Ohio 975.00 16.90 34500.00 5694.00 36.75 72.40
Oklahoma 1027.00 15.50 25918.00 4078.00 55.39 76.30
Oregon 947.00 19.20 35880.00 5913.00 37.71 73.50
Pennsylvania 880.00 17.00 41215.00 6613.00 45.06 81.50
Rhode Island 888.00 14.30 37933.00 6546.00 50.46 76.80
South Carolina 844.00 17.00 29224.00 4436.00 47.25 58.10
South Dakota 1068.00 15.30 24289.00 4173.00 58.72 85.30
Tennessee 1040.00 19.40 28960.00 3692.00 42.82 68.70
Texas 893.00 15.70 29935.00 4632.00 39.22 56.00
Utah 1076.00 24.20 27239.00 3040.00 41.21 81.10
Vermont 901.00 14.00 34824.00 6944.00 42.57 82.40
Virginia 896.00 14.00 32306.00 4880.00 63.34 74.00
Washington 937.00 20.20 35759.00 5271.00 44.98 76.10
West Virginia 932.00 15.20 30301.00 5109.00 65.07 77.00
Wisconsin 1073.00 15.50 35926.00 6139.00 31.85 82.20
Wyoming #N/A 17.20 30080.00 5812.00 52.83 83.80

21 posted on 05/28/2002 11:07:53 AM PDT by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
bump
23 posted on 05/28/2002 11:16:40 AM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
Students that take the SAT test in the West and South tend to be gifted students applying to Ivy League and other elite schools.

I guess the western and southern students are all gifted...
27 posted on 05/28/2002 11:29:28 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
They said the states that spend the most tend to be the urban northeast states, which must work with diverse populations, students who speak English as a second language, and students from low income homes.

Sorry, but this argument won't wash. New York City was always a mecca for immigrants who were poor and couldn't speak English. The Irish, Italians, Germans, Poles and countless other people went to public schools, mastered the language and did extremely well on standardized exams. It's the schools themselves (and mediocre teachers) responsible for the low scores. Don't blame it on the poor.

31 posted on 05/28/2002 12:11:03 PM PDT by Attillathehon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: First_Salute
Betcha those New York janitors are happy.
32 posted on 06/30/2002 12:36:44 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson