Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DAVIS SEES AUTO EMISSIONS BILL AS POTENTIAL CAMPAIGN CASH
email | May 27, 2002 | Russo, Marsh & Rogers

Posted on 05/27/2002 12:45:20 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan

THE INSIDER: POLITICAL INFORMATION NETWORK THE AUTHORITATIVE GUIDE FOR SACRAMENTO INSIDERS AND POLITICAL LEADERS

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Sacramento Political Insiders & Interested Parties
FROM: Russo Marsh + Rogers, Inc.
RE: Davis AB 1058 Non-stance
DATE: May 27, 2002

DAVIS SEES AUTO EMISSIONS BILL AS POTENTIAL CAMPAIGN CASH

SACRAMENTO - For those who may have missed it, the San Francisco Chronicle reported Friday that while meeting with a group of "environmental entrepreneurs," Governor Davis was asked whether he supported Assembly Bill 1058, liberal Assemblywoman Fran Pavley's social-engineering legislation that would place new restrictions on auto tailpipe emissions and unfairly restrict California consumers.

Last week Bill Simon, while voicing his opposition to the bill, also called on the governor to make his position clear.

Davis' response was classic Clintonian - "I'm committed to do the best we can do to get that bill on my desk" - coyly skipping over the key info tidbit of whether he would sign or veto the legislation. In fact, our sources tell us that the governor's press staff called reporters repeatedly to ensure that the governor's equivocation be reported accurately - wanting the bill on his desk, but not announcing a position on the bill.

But we at The Insider, having watched Gov. Davis' actions with keen interest for some time, realize the governor was in fact being completely honest in his response: Gray Davis is committed to getting that bill to his desk.

After all, if you look at interest groups lining up on both sides of this legislation (mostly against), you can see there is a lot of potential campaign contributions just waiting to be snapped up. And we all know where there is a campaign contribution, there is a Gray Davis who - according to his own chief political advisor - will spend 12 hours a day trying to get it.

Chief Davis Political Advisor Gary South, testified under oath: "(Davis) was heavily involved in our attempt to try to raise money. And as I described a few minutes ago, in some cases that could amount to 12-hour days in the office on the phone."

Whether Davis signs or vetoes the bill probably won't be decided until after all of the bank deposits are made.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: ab1058; calgov2002; corruption; graydavis; payola; paytoplay; shakedown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 05/27/2002 12:45:20 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gophack; TheAngryClam; BibChr; Brian Allen ; CalGov2002; Brad's Gramma; Dan from Michigan...
PING
2 posted on 05/27/2002 12:45:50 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Whether Davis signs or vetoes the bill probably won't be decided until after all of the bank deposits are made.

Davis is for sale to the highest bidder.

3 posted on 05/27/2002 12:47:59 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .38sw; 1 FELLOW FREEPER; 101viking; 1lawlady; 2Fro; 357 SIG; 3_if_by_Treason; 45Auto; 4aardvarks...
ALL CALIFORNIA PING (apologies for any duplicate pings)
4 posted on 05/27/2002 12:49:38 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: abwehr
Davis appears to have topped Senator Dianne Feinstein as the most unethical and corrupt campaign fundraiser in California.

That's a pretty tall order.

6 posted on 05/27/2002 12:58:54 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
Davis appears to have topped Senator Dianne Feinstein as the most unethical and corrupt campaign fundraiser in California.

Sad that it has come to this... It's all about money ..To Hell with the children...
DUMP DAVI$



GO SIMON

7 posted on 05/27/2002 12:59:44 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Pulled this little 'ditty' off a Sierra Club site.

>>>>AB 1058, which is supported by Sierra Club, provides a reasonable approach to reducing the effects of global warming. This innovative piece of legislation would require the California Air and Resources Board to adopt regulations by January 1, 2005 that achieve the maximum feasible, cost-effective, and technologically achievable reductions of greenhouse gas pollution from passenger vehicles.

In addition, AB 1058 would give automobile manufacturers, to the maximum extent feasible, the flexibility to decide how to meet the requirements of the regulation. AB 1058 will also help reduce dependence on oil and mitigate energy price shocks in California because nearly all of the methods the automobile industry is likely to use to meet the greenhouse gas standards will decrease the state's demand for petroleum-based fuels. This reduction will result in lower fuel prices and increased savings for consumers and businesses dependent on affordable fuels.(bold emphasis mine)

8 posted on 05/27/2002 1:02:54 PM PDT by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: budwiesest
decrease the state's demand for petroleum-based fuels. This reduction will result in lower fuel prices and increased savings for consumers and businesses dependent on affordable fuels.

Wow. The ignorance is breathtaking. Looks like the greenies were too busy with their cultural awareness courses and self-esteem lectures to have the time for economics.

As demand for gasoline drops, after inventories are depleted the price will go UP as gas stations, delivery trucks and small refiners are forced to go out of business. Less demand, less competition.

9 posted on 05/27/2002 1:09:06 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Wonder if these tailpipe emission standards will be applied to the hordes of Mexican trucks which will soon appear all over California? sarcasm
10 posted on 05/27/2002 1:22:00 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
It's a wonder to me how people like Gray Davis manage to avoid prison.
11 posted on 05/27/2002 1:46:46 PM PDT by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
ditto Mr. Clinton??
12 posted on 05/27/2002 2:07:05 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Did you see Davis on 60 Minutes last night? They did a segment on the three strikes law and how it puts people in prison for life for shoplifting and the like. Croft interviewed Davis as a supporter of the law. It was so obvious he supports it because of some poll and for no other reason, plus there's no way for him to collect campaign cash by opposing it.
13 posted on 05/27/2002 2:10:54 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
The original bill AB1058:

Two cents .02 per mile driven, if you drive 20,000 miles per year this will cost you $400 per year.

Fifty cents per gallon increase in gas tax. this will cost you $500 per year.

$3500 surcharge on SUVs, light trucks. and sports cars.

Reduce the speed limit to 55mph, priceless on you nerves when you have to drive 75/80 miles per day to work.

I dont know where these politicos live but they are completely out of touch with the average woarker in Ca.. If you are young and can only afford a home in the Inland Empire or the Valencia/Newhall are you are screwed. The above cost will double or maybe more.

14 posted on 05/27/2002 2:34:55 PM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Now now janet, we wouldn't want to be racist;)
15 posted on 05/27/2002 2:35:25 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Whether Davis signs or vetoes the bill probably won't be decided until after all of the bank deposits are made

At this point, can we all just come out and call Davis for what he is, a political prostitute?

16 posted on 05/27/2002 2:38:02 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldenstategirl
At this point, can we all just come out and call Davis for what he is, a political prostitute?

Now just a darn minute. He's a working man just trying to earn a buck the best way he knows how.


17 posted on 05/27/2002 2:41:38 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
LOL...You don't know how much I wish that picture could go up on billboards! I wish I wish I wish............
18 posted on 05/27/2002 3:18:44 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
You just ruined my appetite for the rest of the day thinking about the real Gray in this pose. Barf
19 posted on 05/27/2002 3:26:22 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Whether Davis signs or vetoes the bill probably won't be decided until after all of the bank deposits are made.checks clear
20 posted on 05/27/2002 5:13:29 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson