Skip to comments.
Bush Signs Border Security Law (no amnesty!)
yahoo.com ^
| AP
Posted on 05/14/2002 2:34:19 PM PDT by rintense
(AP)
"We must know what our visitors are doing, and when they leave," he said before signing the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act in a Rose Garden ceremony. The bill provides for 200 new investigators and 200 inspectors for the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It requires foreign visitors to carry passports and visas that are tamper-resistant, and also gives border patrol agents a pay increase.
Under the legislation, the INS is required to establish a foreign-student tracking system that records where they've been accepted into school, when their student visas were issued and when they enrolled.
That provision addresses the avenue used by several Sept. 11 hijackers, who entered the United States on student visas.
The bill would also require that passports issued after 2003 be tamper-resistant and that visitors carry documents that can be read by machine and identify the bearer with biometrics, such as face recognition or retinal scanning technology.
Bush said he was sorry Congress didn't include in the bill a measure that would have extended a deadline for giving hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants the chance to apply for residency without leaving the United States.
TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: amnesty; bush; illegals; ins; section245i; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Didn't see this posted yet, so here it is.
Well I can't believe no one has mentioned this! The President actually signed a bill that did not include extending amnesty. If he was as hell bent as some think to get this amnesty, he would have vetoed the bill. But he didn't. Therefore...
NO EXTENDED PERIOD FOR CITIZENSHIP APPLICATION. PERIOD.
1
posted on
05/14/2002 2:34:20 PM PDT
by
rintense
To: Miss Marple; MJY1288; Howlin; ohioWfan; terilyn; sabertooth
PING!
2
posted on
05/14/2002 2:35:47 PM PDT
by
rintense
To: rintense
I just posted this on another thread. It somewhat fits here too:
Wanna see something interesting? Make sure you read the instructions. Here you go:
Go here.Click on the button "Advanced Search". A new input page displays. One the new page enter Islamic in the Keyword(s) field. After that pick a state. Note that you can't do the whole country. Too many responses.
In the words of Carol Anne from the movie "Poltergeist": "THEY'RE HERE!"
You can also enter "keywords" like Muslim and Islam. Try Muslim.
12 posted on 5/14/02 7:19 AM Pacific by isthisnickcool
To: rintense
Read Dubya's lips:
Bush said he was sorry Congress didn't include in the bill a measure that would have extended a deadline for giving hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants the chance to apply for residency without leaving the United States.
Any thanks for not including the amnesty bill is due to the Congress, not Bush.
4
posted on
05/14/2002 2:39:46 PM PDT
by
dougherty
To: rintense
Good news indeed ......No 245(i) for the time being.
http://www.numbersusa.com/index
|
|
Sen Daschle proposes 245(i) amnesty extension
After being forced to remove Section 245(i) from the border security bill, Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD) has said he will introduce a one year extension of the Section 245(i) amnesty and will urge Congress to pass the 245(i) amnesty before the session ends. |
|
To: dougherty
There must have been massive response from the public to have this terrible 245(i) be derailed. I'm gonna raise a toast to the congresscritters. Today is a good day.
To: rintense
Invest in IDNX.
7
posted on
05/14/2002 2:45:43 PM PDT
by
what's up
To: rintense
Obviously we will now see hundreds of articles about the evils of Tom Dachle and how he wants to support amnesty, won't we. Won't we? Bueller?
To: what's up
Yup. This 'biometric id' bit is incrementalism toward biometrically id'ing all of us. Now when questioned as to the status of 'their papers' the immigrants will just reply 'don't need them, i'm a citizen', and present fake drivers licenses. This is to shakedown the system before they bring it online for 300M of the rest of us.
To: rintense
10
posted on
05/14/2002 2:49:02 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: rintense
LOL. He said he was sorry the amnesty WASN'T included. It would take some major convolutions to claim Bush was on the right side of the issue.
To: Miss Marple
Oh Come on. There are 'little tommy dasshole is evil' threads umpteen times a day on freep. He's evil in so many different ways it's really hard to know where to begin...
To: TomGuy
The huge farm bill was the payoff to Daschle to put the 245(i) back on the table. Politics as usual.
To: remaininlight
Before you get too excited, this is from my link in #10:
"Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) introduced Section 245(i) legislation S. 2493 and said he wants to pass it soon and will try to pass it as a stand-alone bill or try to attach it to the Commerce, Justice, State, and Judiciary Appropriations bill. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-MO) echoed Daschless rhetoric saying, President Bush has repeatedly indicated his support for Section 245(i), he has not been able to convince Congressional Republicans to work with him in securing a more meaningful extension of the provision. We will need nothing less than the President's full support and strong leadership to pass this legislation. President Bush promised Mexican President Vicente Fox he would push for passage of Section 245(i)."
14
posted on
05/14/2002 2:54:22 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: rintense
We need to remember to call our congressmen back and thank them. That will make a big impression as far as them knowing we are watching. Pledge your support in the war chest and the voters booth.
To: rintense
If he was as hell bent as some think to get this amnesty, he would have vetoed the bill.Apparently, he desires a second term more than amnesty.
To: isthisnickcool
In the words of Carol Anne from the movie "Poltergeist": "THEY'RE HERE!" So? Heck, enter ANYTHING in there and you'll get zillions of hits. This is America. Everything and everybody is here. What are you trying to show?
17
posted on
05/14/2002 3:04:06 PM PDT
by
RonF
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
If he was as hell bent as some think to get this amnesty, he would have vetoed the billNot when the bill described in Post #5 is on the table. If that passes, and he vetoes it, you can crow -- and I'll eat it.
Realistically, how could he have a vetoed a "border security" law and not damaged himself politically? 245(i) was attached to this originally so that he could minimize the amnesty provision under the mantel of "Border Security." Now it's out there, by itself -- which was politically smart of sleazy Little Tommy -- no more subterfuge -- either it's amnesty, or it ain't.
To: rintense
Actually, I find the parts of this bill that require tracking of foreign students to be much more interesting. I attended an engineering school that had large numbers of foreign students. I got to know some of them, Christian, Moslem, Buddhist, etc. alike. Their purpose was to learn as much as they could and go home and a) build up their country, and b) make bucks doing it.
That is, those that didn't decide that staying in the U.S.A., worshipping, marrying, and working as they pleased wasn't a lot more attractive.
But even in those cases, they were here to live in the U.S.A., not to blow it up.
Having said that, I am fully in favor of requiring all foreign students to be closely tracked. The ones who are serious about studying here will be keeping up on their studies, as someone is spending a lot of money to keep them here. Those who aren't serious about studying should stay home. Trust me, only a few will think they're being abused, and we don't need them.
19
posted on
05/14/2002 3:10:38 PM PDT
by
RonF
To: RonF
What are you trying to show?
That it seems the followers of the moon god are using our nonprofit corp. laws to raise money to promote their jihad to turn this country into a muslim "state".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson