Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

View for sale: $30,000 New owner of a lake fences it off when homeowners wouldn't pay.
St. Petersburg Times ^ | May 14, 2002 | ROBERT FARLEY

Posted on 05/14/2002 5:05:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

EAST LAKE -- Many residents thought they owned the lake behind their $300,000 homes. They mowed up to the water line and chipped in yearly to treat the lake for algae blooms.

So it came as quite a shock Thursday when workers began erecting a 6-foot-high fence around the lake, obliterating their view.

For good measure, the workers painted a portion of the fence behind Alice Beehner's home bright pink and decorated it with sparkles.

"Isn't that atrocious?" Mrs. Beehner said Monday, pointing to the fence a few feet from her screened-in pool. "It's sickening!"

For 10 years the developer of their Tarpon Woods subdivision had let the taxes lapse on the 4-acre lake and a thin band of land around it.

A real estate speculator swooped in to purchase it for $1,000 at a delinquent tax sale in February. The speculator, 44-year-old Don Connolly of Valrico, now is offering to sell the land behind each of the homes for $30,000 per homeowner.

Residents ignored a letter from Connolly, trustee of the Lake Alice Land Trust that purchased the lake, offering to sell. Instead, someone took a couple of survey posts marking the property boundaries and threw them into the lake.

Connolly said that's when he decided to build the fence.

He started behind Beehner's meticulously landscaped property. The new fence separated her from two mature laurel oaks she planted shortly after moving into her home 17 years ago.


[Times photo: Jim Damaske] The fence behind the house of Alice Beehner, with dogs Beethoven and Bridgette, is pink with sparkles. Don Connolly says the color is to warn workers to stay away "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

"It's total extortion," Mrs. Beehner, 61, said Monday.

Connolly said he offered to sell the property to the homeowners as a courtesy.

"Is selling a piece of land extortion?" he said. "That doesn't make any sense to me."

He said he specializes in buying properties at tax sales. Records show he owns 50 properties in Pinellas County. Connolly said he owns 150 to 200 statewide.

"When people don't pay their taxes, this is what happens," he said. "I was willing to pay more than anyone else for this property. . . . The business we're in is unpleasant sometimes."

Connolly knows the consequences of failing to pay taxes.

Records show that in 1997 he was charged with failing to remit more than $100,000 worth of sales tax for an auto sales business he owned in Hillsborough County. Connolly blamed it on the company's accounting firm and said he reached a settlement with the state.

Because homeowners have rebuffed his offer, Connolly said, he now plans to develop two or three "executive" homes overlooking the lake. It might entail a dredge and fill project to move the lake a bit to the south, he said.

County officials said that would be difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish.

"He can't build on it unless he replaces the stormwater drainage," said Al Navaroli, a manager for the county's Development Review Services Department. "And pretty much all of it is stormwater drainage. . . . He's limited in what he can do."

But there's nothing to prevent Connolly from erecting the fence, Navaroli said, or painting it any color he chooses.

"I certainly see the man is trying to be obnoxious to his neighbors," Navaroli said. "But I don't see that he's violating any codes."

On Monday, the fence stretched across three of the 15 waterfront lots. He plans to extend it all the way around the lake.

"My intention is not to annoy anyone," he said.

As for painting the fence pink behind Mrs. Beehner's property, Connolly said, it was done to warn workers to stay away from that site "because that person is very volatile and confronted us in the past."

Connolly said he was shocked by the vitriol from some of the residents. The offer to sell small pieces of land to individual homeowners is off the table. Connolly said he is now negotiating with one homeowner interested in buying the entire 4.7-acre property.

He would not say how much he is asking. "I'm a reasonable man," Connolly said.

Mrs. Beehner warns the pink fence behind her property could be erected behind any number of homes in Pinellas.

"People need to be warned," she said. "This could happen in your back yard."

Connolly said he owns one other lake in Pinellas County.

But Navaroli said his office believes Connolly may own several properties that neighborhoods consider common areas. Navaroli said he warned the county property appraiser's office more than a year ago about the danger of taxing undevelopable lands, such as retention ponds, or selling those lands at tax sale.

"It's a pretty disgusting mess," said County Commissioner Susan Latvala. "We have to prevent this from happening again. That kind of property should not be for sale."

As for the Tarpon Woods lake, however, county officials said there may be nothing they can do to help the homeowners.

Some homeowners blame the developer, Lloyd Ferrentino for allowing the taxes to lapse. At the very least, some said, he should have notified the property owners so they could have tried to buy it. Ferrentino could not be reached Monday.

On Monday, Connolly's workers continued their fence-building, extending it behind the home of Peter Cieslinski. Cieslinski, 44, who was just released from active duty in the Navy a week ago, said he can't believe the county would allow someone to come in and take away his view of the alligators, turtles and wading birds.

"I look at it this way: There's the spirit of the law and the letter of the law," Cieslinski said. "The county is looking at this as the letter of the law. There's got to be a legal Latin term for "the law says this, but wait a minute, look at the extenuating circumstances.' "

Mrs. Beehner said neighbors plan to hire an attorney.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: property
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: Wm Bach
You misunderstood. My response was to someone objecting to the statement that gov't uses violence. Of course it does. Everything the gov't does is ultimately backed up by violence if the party in question refuses to abide.
481 posted on 05/14/2002 9:40:35 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

Comment #482 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
I for one am happy that the Constitution protects the rights even of jerks like this speculator. I find it amazing how many so-called conservatives are willing to turn the Constitution on its head when they are uncomfortable with the results.
483 posted on 05/14/2002 9:41:57 AM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

Comment #484 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
He paid to put up the fence so he could charge people to take down the fence. There is no other reason for the fence except to extort money.

You have a strange, marxist view of "extortion". I always thought that making you pay for what I own is called "commerce". And I thought that you taking it without paying for it was called "theft".

You're on a commie soapbox demanding "land reform". Just look at yourself, man!

After all, isn't Mugabe claiming the white farmers are denying the "right" of the "war veterans" to "enjoy" their farms (or something like that)?

-Eric

485 posted on 05/14/2002 9:43:58 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Anti-social behavior may lead to the development of corrective legislation. Pretty simple.

The last bastion of the thug.

Some people think it's anti-social that they have less than others. That's how we got the welfare state. I'm sure you support that given your liberal and violent proclivities.

486 posted on 05/14/2002 9:45:01 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

Comment #487 Removed by Moderator

Comment #488 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
If one of their kids drowned in the lake or a pet was eaten by an aligator, who would they sue? I think we know the answer. I would fence the property just to protect myself until someone else owned it.
489 posted on 05/14/2002 9:46:43 AM PDT by Woodman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

Comment #490 Removed by Moderator

To: Kevin Curry
Meanwhile ThomasJefferson and the rest of the deaf, dumb, and blind "in your face" libertarians here will continue to harrumph and complain that the statists are taking over while defending the miscreant

Hey Kevvie boy, I didn't see you withdraw your lie. Did you crawl back under your rock? Lowlife

491 posted on 05/14/2002 9:47:15 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: maxwell ; Lazamataz; NittanyLion
Zoning and Homeowners Associations permit this.

Would they permit me to remove my neighbors as well? They ain't too easy on the eyes...

That's a reason why I love the country so much.

492 posted on 05/14/2002 9:47:48 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
[Anti-social behavior may lead to the development of corrective legislation.]

The last bastion of the thug.

The foundation of America's systems of laws.

493 posted on 05/14/2002 9:47:48 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

Comment #494 Removed by Moderator

To: Roscoe
The structure would appear to have been erected with the intent to damage the property values of adjoining owners. Such behavior, if legal, may lead to changes in the laws and regulations governing that area.

Do you consider such use of the law a violation of the rights of the adjacent landowner? Would you consider it unethical?

495 posted on 05/14/2002 9:48:30 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: You are here
Nope, sorry, you're wrong. If the law allows a privacy fence, then it's allowed for the purpose of protecting my right to privacy, and anyone who peers over the fence -- let alone someone who builds a structure to enable him to regularly see over it -- is violating my privacy, and will find out the hard way that it will not be tolerated.

You see, I have a right to enjoy MY privacy, and you do not. Nor do you have a right to prevent me from enjoying my privacy by defeating my privacy fence legally erected on my property.

Are you saying that the first people to build a 'structure', in this case a fence can prevent neighbors from building decks? Interesting, we put up a privacy fence and later the neighbors built a deck. Are you saying that they are not allowed to do that????

496 posted on 05/14/2002 9:49:11 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

Comment #497 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
Nope, sorry, you're wrong. If the law allows a privacy fence, then it's allowed for the purpose of protecting my right to privacy, and anyone who peers over the fence -- let alone someone who builds a structure to enable him to regularly see over it -- is violating my privacy, and will find out the hard way that it will not be tolerated.

Would you be so kind as to point out where in the Bill of Rights or in any civil or penal law that you have this 'right of privacy'? I assert that it does not exist. You may come up with any one civil or penal statute, or any one clause in the Constitution, to prove me wrong.

498 posted on 05/14/2002 9:49:52 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Yep. The homeowners would be better off forming a coalition and letting him decide between 1) a fair price for all the land and 2) not one damn cent from any of them. I suspect, faced with the prospect of not recouping anything, he's sell them the property at a more reasonable price.

451 posted on 5/14/02 9:19 AM Pacific by NittanyLion [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

I had a couple of "neighbors" suggest what I could and could not do with my property, this was after I re-established the legal boundries that they had inadvertantly borrowed 50 feet or so of to plant a hedge row. They owned one acre parcels.

Guess what? When I suggested that A) They either keep to there own land or b) Learn to live with a 1,000 Hog farm in there back yard they decided to become civilized.

499 posted on 05/14/2002 9:49:58 AM PDT by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

Comment #500 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson