[tacticalogic]

The structure would appear to have been erected with the intent to damage the property values of adjoining owners. Such behavior, if legal, may lead to changes in the laws and regulations governing that area.

Do you consider such use of the law a violation of the rights of the adjacent landowner? Would you consider it unethical?

[Roscoe]

Do you consider such use of the law a violation of the rights of the adjacent landowner?

Homeowners who consider the enjoyment of their property diminished and/or their resale values reduced will doubtless take those grievances to their elected representives. As Kevin Curry previously pointed out, that may result in more burdensome legal restrictions on the use of property being enacted.

Actions have consequences.