Posted on 05/13/2002 3:12:19 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
On Monday's show, the Doctor of Democracy made a sad diagnosis: "If the Reagan Revolution is not dead, then it's dying." If there was a model that the Bush administration used in establishing itself, it was the Reagan presidency. But now Bush is advancing the Democrats' most liberal agenda items - something particularly frustrating at a time when Bush's popularity would make it easy for him to recruit new conservatives.
Many of you have been critical of Rush's reactions to Bush's actions on spending over the recent months, and we took more calls of this sort on Monday - people who'd convinced themselves that the farm bill made sense or that Bush had some grand strategery at play. Now, Rush could throw his beliefs out the window for a day or two and say things that you might want to hear - like when he endorsed Clinton back in 1992 - but that's not what he does.
Rush can only give you his honest reaction, even when he doesn't like those reactions. That's honesty, folks, and it goes to disprove a key criticism many of the nation's liberals have made of Rush over the years. They've said that Rush is a party hack, and that he'd support the Republican Party no matter what they did. They charged that the EIB Network was simply a tool, that we were in daily contact with the powers that be to get marching orders. Well, that has pretty much been dispelled here: Rush is disgruntled.
That's an interesting observation and I think it has merit. But he's still one of the good guys, and even if he never does another thing, he's still done far more than his share for our side.
I wouldn't worry too much about the criticism. Dubya can handle Rush. Tha man's a born winner. I wouldn't play poker with him.
And I think the bashing and other self-indulgence has caused Rush to lose listeners. I don't listen anywhere near the amount I used to.
He is not obligated to toe the line on a constant set of invilable rules.!
It is OK for Bush to be pragmatic, especially if it's for the short term, in order to acheive a majority in the Senate.
If he currently had the majority in both houses do you really believe he would have;
Signed the Farm Bill, as written?
Signed the Bill imposing Steel tarrifs?
signed the Education Bill, as written?
Rush will prevail long term, and getting people to wonder why he is questioning Dubya ups the ratings.
There are a few other differences between Dubya and Slick that your rhetorical question overlooks. Has Dubya done anything impeachable? Has he taken money from the Chinese Communist? How about drug dealers? Has he committed perjury? Sexual assault? Rape? Has he made any foreign policy decisions with the intent of hiding domestic scandal?
Bush has yet to be caught in a lie.
Clinton was not just a bad president, he was a bad man.
The reality is we don't control the Senate and our president lost the popular vote. I'm going to cut him slack.
Some trade off, a treaty that would never pass in a million years against,
new unconstitutional education programs,
the start of government takeover of religious charity,
the repeal of the first amendment,
the "Patriot" act,
the new senior citizen entitlement of prescription drugs (right out of the Hillary handbook),
the twice defeated "know your customer rule",
federal takeover of airport security,
trade war starting steel tariffs and protectionism,
amnesty for illegal immigrants,
power grabbing military tribunals
Expanded farm subsidies
and there are probably more I have forgotten to mention.
That is worth the price of admission, if you are a liberal.
Bush: Don't Federalize Air Screeners
80% of airport's screeners are Illegal Aliens
Airport Screeners Sue Over US Citizenship Requirement
Bill offers airport screeners chance to earn citizenship
Bush Caves On Airport Screeners
"My approach gives the government the flexibility it needs to assemble a skilled and disciplined screening work force,"
George W. Bush - Source
GWB is putting the farmers (like Ted Turner) on welfare, big-time.
GWB did not lift a FINGER for Alaskan crude, other than proposing the location.
GWB has yet to make ONE UNIT of the Federal Gummint SMALLER.
Worst, by far, was the Bush/Ashcroft hammering-through of the "terrorist" act--which Jim Sensenbrenner opposed (most conservative Republican in the House after Paul) AND which Russ Feingold opposed (most liberal Dem in the Senate, bar none.)
The "anti-terrorist" bill will be Hillary's excuse for imprisoning ANYONE for "thought crimes."
Sorry, Hacker--there's more to the Presidency than foreign policy, although I will credit Bush for re-discovering the American national interest in that arena.
GW has to walk a tightrope with these bstrds. McLame=Jeffords=Shays=Rangel. Maybe twenty five cents worth of difference between the whole crew.
Our Country is in deep clinton!
Rush has a handle on bedrock principles. That's why he is still #1 in the business--and his ability to entertain helps, yes.
I do not always agree with him, and sometimes I have written lengthy nastygrams to him.
However, his time is noon-three Central--and he OWNS it.
You don't.
Hyperbole, anyone?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.