Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mom Sues Over Ejection From School Assembly On Homosexuality
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 5/13/02 | Matt Pyeatt

Posted on 05/13/2002 3:10:36 AM PDT by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - A St. Louis, Mo. mom is suing the public high school that blocked her from observing a school-sponsored assembly conducted by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).

Debra Loveless had told school officials she considered the event inappropriate, but was trying to view it herself on Oct. 24, 2001 when she was escorted out of the assembly, according to Loveless' attorneys, who have filed the federal civil rights lawsuit in U.S. District Court in St. Louis. Loveless' daughter attends Metro High School.

GLSEN bills itself as the country's largest network of parents, students and educators aimed at preventing "discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender/identity expression in K-12 schools," according to its website.

GLSEN did not return phone calls to CNSNews.com.

The group conducted two assemblies at Metro High School, Oct. 17 and Oct. 24 of last year, both of which Loveless' daughter was exempted from attending because of the family's religious beliefs, according to the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), the public interest law firm representing Loveless.

However, when, at the urging of a school board member, Loveless attempted to attend the Oct. 24 event, she was ejected by an armed security guard, the ACLJ stated.

Francis J. Manion, senior counsel for the ACLJ, said parents should be able to participate in activities at a public school to see if it is appropriate for their children.

"This case is about protecting the rights of parents to participate fully in the education of their children," he said. "Parents do not abandon their rights as parents once their children go to school. Parents have a right to know what a school is teaching their children, and should not be punished for exercising their parental responsibilities. That's exactly what happened in this case."

The ACLJ lawsuit contends that school officials deprived Loveless of her parental right to be fully informed of the content of her daughter's education. The suit also claims Loveless' constitutional rights of free speech and equal protection was infringed.

Manion believes there were ulterior motives to blocking Loveless from attending the assembly.

"The real reason we believe our client was not permitted to observe the school assembly is because the school did not like her religious objections to the assembly," said Manion. "The only thing our client wanted was an apology and a change in the school policy governing the rights of parents to observe school assemblies.

"After Mrs. Loveless was ejected from the assembly, she had no choice but to file suit - to ensure that no other parent in St. Louis is treated in the same manner," he added.

The lawsuit names as defendants the superintendent of St. Louis Public Schools and the principal of Metro High School.

CNSNews.com
attempted to contact Metro High School Principal Dr. Pamela Randall, but she was away from the campus and unavailable for comment. The Metro High School Instructional Coordinator refused comment Friday, saying she was unaware of any lawsuit.

E-mail a news tip to Matt Pyeatt.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-203 next last
To: scripter
You asked... ;o)
181 posted on 05/13/2002 12:16:51 PM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: TxBec
Thanks for the ping.

I hate to see lawsuits like this but I hope the mom wins. GLSEN shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a school yard.

182 posted on 05/13/2002 1:44:20 PM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bttt
183 posted on 05/13/2002 2:17:50 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Bump
184 posted on 05/13/2002 4:20:17 PM PDT by gueroloco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BTTT
185 posted on 05/13/2002 6:05:41 PM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The girl was exempted because of her religious beliefs! Why did she have to offer a religious excuse to be exempted? Why couldn't she just have said that the whole thing disgusted her and she wasn't going to sit there and try to control her barfing?
186 posted on 05/13/2002 6:44:21 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Bump.
187 posted on 05/13/2002 9:13:12 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
My guess is that GLSEN was afraid to be exposed.

They should be.

188 posted on 05/13/2002 11:06:09 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JoshGray
The NEA needs to go, but does anyone really think that's going to happen?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

You really think so? I would have thought a liberal like you would have no problem with them.

189 posted on 05/13/2002 11:19:02 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: JoshGray
That was sarcasm.

...in lieu of logic.

190 posted on 05/13/2002 11:23:04 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
However, she was asked to attend the assembly by a school-board member, which in and of itself ought to be reason enough to let her attend.

I think JG is ignoring this small fact.

191 posted on 05/13/2002 11:37:39 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JoshGray
I submit that she had no purpose at the assembly other than disruption

Now you're making things up. Did you skip the sentence that stated she attended "at the urging of a school board member"?

192 posted on 05/13/2002 11:42:54 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: No More Gore Anymore
I know what you mean. Everyone here wailed on him (JG) so much, I almost feel bad now for previously joining in. Almost.
193 posted on 05/14/2002 12:05:56 AM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Please explain how Hammond knew which adult to eject and why Rochell Moore wouldn't have explained that the parent was known ?

It was not in the thread-starting article.

194 posted on 05/14/2002 2:19:02 AM PDT by JoshGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
If you are now resorting to painting my posistion that the woman had a right to attend the assembly as being homophobic you appear have certainly managed to paint yourself into a corner and now can only win by resorting to labeling others whom you disagree with.

My apologies. I had a lot of replies yesterday, mostly ignorable, and some "don't want to go there" thoughts slipped out.

For all this talk of the woman's rights as a parent and a taxpayer, my position would remain the same if it were Exodus International sponsoring the assembly and a GLSTEN-parent who was ejected. I don't know if that applies to you or not, but there it is.

195 posted on 05/14/2002 2:24:38 AM PDT by JoshGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: JoshGray
Perhaps the replies were ignorable to you because the logic they presented of democracy and taxation without representation is beyond your understanding.

If you don't mind blindly paying taxes or being told to stay out of publicly funded institutions , that is your business. If you embrace total government control over your life and your children's lives ( if you had any) that again is your choice.

I don't think you should mind that another American would want to exercise their right though.

The reason why we are the home of the free and the land of the brave is not because of people like you who run away from demanding their rights under the law, and who hand their children over to the socialists at government schools to be brainwashed without a fight.

Someday, God willing, the people in power at places like government schools might be conservatives, and then people like you would have to think for yourselves and not just follow the path of least resistance laid out by the liberals and socialists.

196 posted on 05/14/2002 6:21:41 AM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: KentuckyWoman
Public School SNAFU !! !!
197 posted on 05/14/2002 7:42:53 AM PDT by Alabama_Wild_Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoshGray
For all this talk of the woman's rights as a parent and a taxpayer, my position would remain the same if it were Exodus International sponsoring the assembly and a GLSTEN-parent who was ejected. I don't know if that applies to you or not, but there it is.

One point that has been ignored is that people like you are usually the first to say to a complaining parent, typically in a shrill voice, "How do you know what was said and that it was bad!? Did you actually attend the assembly yourself? Did you hear what the presenters had to say!!??" But when a parent actually does try to hear it for themselves, you attack them as someone who only attended the assembly for the reason of disruption.

Typical shameless liberal tactics. Now, bugger off back to DUh.

198 posted on 05/14/2002 7:50:17 AM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Spiff;Clint N. Suhks;FormerLib;GrandMoM; scripter; onesog; wwjdn; conserve-it; Buffalo Bob...
Bump! Well said!
199 posted on 05/14/2002 8:22:29 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
WooHoo You tell it like it is.
200 posted on 05/14/2002 9:20:55 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson