Skip to comments.
WAS JESUS GOD'S NEPHEW? NEW SCANDAL ROCKS CATHOLIC CHURCH
SW ^
Posted on 05/09/2002 7:00:15 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: exmarine
Dude lighten up.
41
posted on
05/09/2002 10:54:08 AM PDT
by
weikel
To: Sir Gawain
He's Anglican, not Catholic. You should get your facts right before posting.
To: medlarebil
I didn't write the story, genius.
To: exmarine
"it's a matter of DISRESPECT and BLASPHEMY. Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life and no one comes to the Father but by me." [jn 14:6] I wouldn't want to be this farce of a religious person, come judgement day!!! Good thing he resigned. To think he was teaching this stuff to innocent children!! They must really be confused.
Those in his church who DID NOTHING about it for all these years.. are culpable too!!
To: Sir Gawain
You wrote the headline. That's the part you got wrong, genius.
To: medlarebil
I didn't write the headline. I copied it from the source. SatireWire later changed it. They do that often.
To: medlarebil
If you'll notice, they've also changed some of the wording in the story since I posted it.
To: Sir Gawain
Geesh! You'd think you were declaring Islam a religion of peace or something....
To: Cyber Liberty
SW's done that before. I post their articles as soon as they're posted on SW, and they usually go back and edit them afterwards.
To: exmarine
You'd think a smart guy like a God could speak clearly so that people desperately trying to follow his teachings could all figure out what exactly it was he meant. biblical truths are spiritually discerned not intellectually discerned. Since you are not a believer you cannot understand. Read 1st Cor. 2:14: But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
That's fine, exmarine, but it is actually nonresponsive to the point. By whatever means this alleged "truth" comes to be known, Christian advocates seem to be widely divergent about what that "truth" is.
Undercutting an intellectual understanding of the Bible buys you more trouble than you might at first realize. It sort of makes reading the Bible pointless -- since the fruits of spiritual understanding are not to be found in any intellectual grasp thereof.
50
posted on
05/09/2002 11:40:28 AM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
Actually, you are wrong. All "christians" agree on the essentials - deity of Christ, means of salvation, virgin birth of Christ, bodily resurrection. These are historic essentials that go back to to Jesus Himself. Anyone who denies these cannot call themselves an orthodox or biblical Christian. These essentials DEFINE Christianity and they are from the bible. As the man said, "unity in the essentials, liberty in the non-essentials and in all things, charity." Of course, since you are a mere skeptic (I remember you from other threads), I do not expect you to accept anything I say as your purpose is purely polemical. go bother someone else.
51
posted on
05/09/2002 12:49:52 PM PDT
by
exmarine
To: exmarine
biblical truths are spiritually discerned not intellectually discerned.Lucky for you.
To: weikel
.... "Aryan Heresy".I think you mean Arian Heresy. An Aryan Heresy would be the belief that Aryans (Most Europeans, Iranians, Indians, etc.) are superior to other races (Jews, Arabs, other Semites, Negros, Mongols, Amerinds, Australians, Polynesians, Chinese, Japanese, Chuckchee, etc.)
Arias believed that Christ was created by God and therefore subject to Him. Opponents (Athanasius et. al.) believed that Christ was uncreated, co-equal, co-eternal and consubstantial with his Father. I leave it to the Theophagi to dispute such points.
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
Comment #55 Removed by Moderator
To: Sir Gawain
No--
Jesus was and is the Son of God. Next question.
56
posted on
05/09/2002 8:52:28 PM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: exmarine
Actually, they would excommunicate the likes of you. Interpreting the bible is not my job. I have enough jobs in life and I like to leave that one where it belongs in the capable hands of the papacy established for just that purpose and a number of others.
57
posted on
05/10/2002 12:07:21 AM PDT
by
BlackElk
To: exmarine
Do you agree with the Gospel of John which tells us that when Jesus Christ told his disciples of the necessity of eating His Flesh and Drinking His Blood in order to see heaven, that many of them found that a hard saying and walked away. Many still find that a hard saying and still walk away. Many find a truly obscure hidden meaning that wine means grape juice and that the Eucharist is merely symbolic. You know what I think as a Catholic, don't you? What do you think about the Real Presence, and why?
58
posted on
05/10/2002 12:15:34 AM PDT
by
BlackElk
To: Central Scrutiniser
And you are a fool if you believe that joking about the nature and person of Jesus Christ is okay.
59
posted on
05/10/2002 8:40:26 AM PDT
by
exmarine
To: BlackElk
The catholic doctrine of Transubstantiation has nothing to do with this thread. The issue here is blasphemous use of the name of Jesus Christ, and there is no question that blasphmey has indeed been committed by those who support this poison post. Stop hiding behind the catholic church - blasphemy is blasphemy.
60
posted on
05/10/2002 8:47:53 AM PDT
by
exmarine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson