Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A good time to be armed
Star Telegram (Dallas) ^ | 6 May 2002 | Allan Saxe

Posted on 05/07/2002 9:53:16 AM PDT by 45Auto

I am an unlikely supporter of the National Rifle Association and similar groups. I've not fired a gun in more than 40 years. I dislike hunting intensely and believe all firearms to be symbols of a violent society. But I am also a very practical human being.

I supported the Texas law that allowed concealed handguns. I believe strongly in the literal interpretation of the Second Amendment guaranteeing private ownership of guns. But I also hold that such gun ownership comes with responsibility and consequences for one's actions.

Since Sept. 11, my support of gun ownership has only intensified.

What if the pilots or others on those ill-fated planes had been armed? The thought of a gunfight on a high-altitude plane is frightening, but the mere appearance of armed pilots and passengers might have turned things around.

I have always believed that humans are inherently violent creatures. That gives no comfort to those who hope for human progress and enlightenment. But because of the violent nature of man, we must deter violence by armed means.

Police are armed. There are armed forces to deter aggressors and terrorists. In an extension of this argument, why not an armed citizenry as well?

One situation supports my idea of an armed citizenry.

About 10 years ago, a student told me a very frightening tale. She was driving alone on Interstate 30 late at night. A car with two men came up alongside hers. They began hurling insults at her, motioning her to pull over. She looked straight ahead, trying not to make any face-to-face contact. They continued their insults and tried to run her car off the highway. The mere description of it is frightening.

However, she always carried a gun with her, as she had night classes and also worked evenings as well. She pulled the gun from her purse and held it up so the two harassing men could plainly view it. The convincing way she held the gun and her determined look made the men drive off without any confrontation.

She was convinced that without the gun, the men would have forced her off the highway. By the way, she knew well how to use firearms.

Since then, the issue of terrorism has become front and center for us all.

Why not have everyone who is willing, trained and licensed to carry legal weapons be allowed to do so? I would feel more comfortable in public places if I knew that many people there might be carrying firearms and knew how to use them.

True, terrorists bent on suicide might not be deterred, but they might be stopped before their horror could be unleashed. This has happened frequently in Israel and others places plagued with terrorism. If terrorism were to be unleashed in this country, as some predict and fear, an armed and responsible citizenry would be a helpful addition to the fight.

Citizens have a right to defend their bodies, their property and their liberty. The Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property without due process of the law." Responsible people have the right - perhaps even the obligation - of defending themselves, their families and their property from terrorism, foreign or domestic.

We do not live in a pleasant world. Those who are against firearms unjustly and unfairly believe that depriving people of legal firearms makes us safer. They are wrong!

Please know that gun use and ownership is commensurate with responsibility. If anyone using a firearm harms the innocent, that person should be held accountable, swiftly and surely. I have always believed in gun ownership, but the tragic events of Sept. 11 and the ongoing threat of terrorism have bolstered my long-held beliefs considerably.

Allan Saxe is a UT-Arlington associate professor.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: meyer
It's okay to shoot an armed thug, but not okay to kill Bambi.

Don't name 'em if you're gonna' eat 'em. :^)

It's OK to name them "camp meat".

61 posted on 05/08/2002 7:12:19 AM PDT by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
OH yeah!!bump
62 posted on 05/26/2002 9:25:36 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
bttt
63 posted on 05/26/2002 9:41:19 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
BUMP!
64 posted on 05/26/2002 9:45:16 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Is it Freudian if I prefer to carry short barreled handguns? Dirty Harry liked his 6 1/2".
65 posted on 05/26/2002 9:54:29 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: meyer
At about 5 y.o. I visited my great grandfather at his Missouri farm. I remember asking him what his pig was named, and his reply was "Christmas Dinner". For too many, times have changed.

Sheeple will be slaughtered here because they are afraid to defend themselves and their loved ones. More humans are afraid than violent.

67 posted on 05/26/2002 10:11:42 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Citizens have a right to defend their bodies, their property and their liberty.

In a number of states, property is excluded from the list.

68 posted on 05/26/2002 10:20:24 AM PDT by JimRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Sig Sauer .45 P220 bump.

10-4 on the Sig 220. From a handling, durability and loaded-carry (one in the chamber) standpoint it's the best .45 self-loader available IMHO. Now Glocks - you can have all of them.

69 posted on 05/26/2002 10:40:55 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: 45Auto
This one isn't too bad either: Glock model 22, 40 S&W, fifteen in the handle, one in the pipe. Reliable and accurate.
71 posted on 05/26/2002 10:57:53 AM PDT by glockmeister40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
. . I still like my 1911s LOL LOL. I do own both and it would be tough to call either far superior . . .

You have Freepmail.

72 posted on 05/26/2002 10:59:19 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
I've seen Glocks have problems at matches in more ways that I care to count. One of the problems that I have noticed was a failure to feed the first round out of the magazine if the pistol was topped off to begin with. In other words, a fully loaded magazine with one in the chamber failing to load the first round after the one in the chamber was fired. I don't know what kind of magazines were used but it turned into a common problem. Too many people load a magazine and then simply load the chamber from that without topping off. They're not taking advantage of a fully loaded pistol.
73 posted on 05/26/2002 11:02:51 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: dax zenos
I have a Colt Commander that has a faulty extractor. That's the one that I use for IDPA. I never know if I'm going to get through the stage without jamming. I thought that I would finally get it fixed and then thought that it didn't matter. I use the same rig for the matches that I use every day except the Commander stays home and I use a Springfield Armory, V-10 Ultra-Compact.

I'm not one to care one way or another about name recognition when I buy something.

75 posted on 05/26/2002 12:31:03 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

To: 45Auto
bump!!!
77 posted on 05/30/2002 2:59:02 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
Is it Freudian if I prefer to carry short barreled handguns?

Yes, it is. The only way for you to recover is to send them all to me. I'll (heh heh) hold onto them while you take that Super Blackhawk to the 12-step program...

78 posted on 05/30/2002 3:04:30 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
BTTT
79 posted on 06/23/2002 9:30:51 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bttt
80 posted on 06/24/2002 7:35:50 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson