Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Priests: A Time for Truth
The Washington Dispatch ^ | 05/06/02 | Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson

Posted on 05/06/2002 6:17:00 AM PDT by Spin

In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

The purpose of the press is to let the truth be known to the people. But having seen report after report of the sex scandal in the Catholic Church, I am sorry to say that yet again the media is failing us by refusing to tell us that the primary problem within the church is an epidemic of homosexual priests. We know that most victims of these crimes are young boys, and the perpetrators are grown men—why is it so hard to say that this epidemic is a direct result of homosexuals being given authority that they should not have?

We’ve heard for some time now about priests who are openly homosexual, but apparently few within the Church seemed to see a need to resolve this issue. It’s even more troubling, then, that the media is so unwilling to report something that has long been known. Of course we know that the media is basically liberal, and has the intent of promoting a biased agenda. But you’d think that at least some would have the good sense to report honestly when the physical and psychological safety of so many children are at stake.

If the media, the most far-reaching informational source, refuse to accurately report this predominantly homosexual scandal, then the truth is being concealed and this problem may never be resolved. If something isn’t done, homosexuals will continue to gain authority over our children and country, and the effects will be disastrous.

For the rest of the article, click here.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Clint N. Suhks; All
Celibacy is nothing but self discipline
61 posted on 05/06/2002 12:46:33 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jackd
Homosexuality is condemned in BOTH the Old and New Testaments.

Homosexual acts, yes. One must distinguish between acts and orientation.

62 posted on 05/06/2002 1:07:32 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
There are many medical conditions (and prescription drugs) that reduce the libido to zero. Sex becomes no longer of interest at all.

I understand that, but these are temporary conditions or conditions that onset later in life. I'm not aware of any humans who don't develop or experience libido at some time in their lives.

63 posted on 05/06/2002 1:18:10 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113
Yes, you are quite right, I forgot to mention that part, and that is a very important part of sex within marriage, it was a mistake leaving it out, I thank you for correcting the mistake. God Bless
64 posted on 05/06/2002 1:31:11 PM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur;onesog
I believe you are correct on this sink...castration makes the act impossible but not the thought..99% of sex is in the brain..that is why Jesus warned that a man that has committed adultery in his head is guilty...

I accept the churches teaching that the "tendency" is not sinful..but I think the head thoughts sure are...but then we are all sinners saved by grace..even the homosexuals..

Sink I just do not want active homosexuals in the ministry period (and I do not care what church we are talking about!)

I do not know how the RC church or any church does this...but for the safety of the children and the name of Chrsit they must

66 posted on 05/06/2002 2:16:19 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Spin
Homosexuality is an aberration of sexual normalcy and causes an out-of-control sexual appetite—those who cannot control themselves should not be watching over our children. Take the Boy Scouts for example. How can a Scoutmaster be entrusted as the sole, unchecked supervisor to care for your kids out in the woods, far away from authority, if he is not sexually restrained?

The same goes for the public schools, such as Fairfax High School here in Los Angeles, which many years back adopted a program called “Project 10”, which encouraged kids to live as homosexuals openly and freely. The indoctrination of young, innocent minds by homosexual teachers goes against a child’s conscience and innocence and is contrary to the teachings of most parents.

Anyone remember watching C-SPAN in April of 1993 when they carried the Gay March on Washington? Here is the list of 10 Platform demands they were seeking at the time:

And why didn't they mention gay priests? Because they were already working their magic in the seminaries. They had set for themselves a goal in the early 70's to takeover the mainline denomination seminaries, not just Catholic. They had enough people in place that whenever the Pope gave any directive it would immediately be diregarded.
67 posted on 05/06/2002 2:34:53 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spin
I am sorry to say that yet again the media is failing us by refusing to tell us that the primary problem within the church is an epidemic of homosexual priests. We know that most victims of these crimes are young boys, and the perpetrators are grown men—why is it so hard to say that this epidemic is a direct result of homosexuals being given authority that they should not have?

Well luckily most people are smart enough to figure this out for themselves. The only ones who don't get it are the folks in the media and those elderly Jewish voters down in Florida that voted for Buchanan.
68 posted on 05/06/2002 2:44:30 PM PDT by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spin
Thanks, Spin. Great post. This one cuts to the heart of it.
69 posted on 05/06/2002 6:11:36 PM PDT by rebuildus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: Goldhammer
agreed
72 posted on 05/06/2002 9:44:52 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Republic
SAD (those who practice homosexuality) folks

I like that! Thanks! I'm going to use it from now on. SAD sure makes more sense to me than "gay."

73 posted on 05/06/2002 9:50:46 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer
He did not indulge the temptations mentally. He did not sin in any manner.

Amen!

Christ died to pay the penalty for our sins, and to free us from sin. NOT to continue to party like its 1999.

Organizations like "Dignity USA" treat the crucified Christ as a Get Out of Jail Free card rather than as a Savior. And as far as that annoying scripture in Leviticus Chapter 18 ------ahhhh, well, ummmmmmmmm, I guess God does not mean what He says.

74 posted on 05/06/2002 10:12:15 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: It's me
Yeah...SAD works for me, too. But I did not coin this-it actually refers to homosexuals who achieve orgasms thru trysts with same sex partners and stands for same-sex addictive disease or something like that...wish I could remember exactly what the letters stand for. I do know that I could NEVER, with honesty or dignity refer to people who indulge in such perverse sexual behavior as - gay. Ever. It is too dishonest for words.
75 posted on 05/07/2002 11:56:51 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Spin
Language is another institution the homosexuals are killing with their perversion. Far from being "gay", homosexuals are in fact tortured souls who in their heart of hearts know they are sickos. So, "gay" should never be used, especially by conservatives, to describe a homosexual. To do so, plays into their game.
76 posted on 05/16/2002 4:31:29 AM PDT by Zorrito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NWU Army ROTC
I have no problem if the Church had ordained gay celibate priests.

Imagine trying to be celibate while living in a women's dormitory for seven years.

That's why Pope John XXIII said that homosexuals should not be allowed to enter the seminary.

77 posted on 05/16/2002 4:46:31 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
God gave Adam and Eve a commandment to "multiply and replenish the earth." When did he rescind it?

Matthew 19:12

"For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it."

I don't know if this necessarily represents a rescinding of the command in Genesis, but it certainly indicates that celibacy is a gift for those able to receive it.

I also believe that temple priests were celibate, at least for certain periods of time.

78 posted on 05/16/2002 4:54:10 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
I wonder, however, if that view -- one that ties together so closely proper human sexuality with baby making, a view devised principally by those who do not make babies -- is what keeps so many American Catholics from sharing their faith's official beliefs on the subject.

Most Catholics practice contraception. Why? One reason is that most Catholics don't understand the reason for the Church's teaching, partly because the subject is rarely preached. Another reason is that Catholics can be selfish, just like everyone else. A new car or a new baby? Hmmm....

It's very sad when you think about it. Especially when you consider that God allows us to play a part in bringing eternal souls into the world. Or not. I wonder what He thinks of our excuses?

79 posted on 05/16/2002 5:03:34 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Very good metaphor. Seven years in a female dormitory, I could last a bit, but certainly not seven years, thank you, never really thought about that.
80 posted on 05/16/2002 5:25:06 AM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson