Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The rise of neo-paganism (No, this one is NOT SATIRE)
National Review Online ^ | 27th September 1999 | Roger Scruton

Posted on 05/04/2002 7:45:25 PM PDT by Tomalak

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-217 next last
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
What is puzzling is that you do not understand that civil behavior is almost entirely dependent on a correct moral and religious upbringing. It is the lack of this upbringing which is filling our society with sociopathic criminals.

Morality is completely independant of religion.

I offer, as example, Islam.

101 posted on 05/04/2002 10:45:35 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Tomalak
A general concern for your fellow man and your culture and society?

Yeah, and where do you draw the line between being a concerned citizen, and being a busy-body, Nanny-State Government Socialist? It's a razor-thin line at that. I'm more with LiberalBuster on this issue. Of course, I'm not a Christian either, so it's harder for me to sympathize, I suppose?

And whats all this I hear about the Puritans being against potpori? What could they possibly have against the fresh scent of cinnamon and wildflowers...it's crazy and silly I tell you...

Oh wait...that was POPERY?

Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeever mind...
102 posted on 05/04/2002 10:45:37 PM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: discostu
At this juncture all your doing is twisting my words into stuff I have already told you explicitly they do not mean. When you're ready to discuss what I actually said let me know.

Oh, they mean those things. But since you are ignorant of history, and of the One True God who stands above history, you simply can't recognize where your line of thinking ultimately will lead you.

Until you answer the Lord's knock on your door, you won't understand either.

I'm going to bed now, but I'll pray for you, and for all my other FReeper friends here who haven't met him yet. Good night.

103 posted on 05/04/2002 10:45:58 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: discostu
The only people I blame for anything are the idiots like Chesterson that blather on endlessly about stuff they are completely ignorant of.

Then I take it that the above statement was made as both hyperbole and a visceral dislike for a person that appears to have done some research that neglected to get the facts from your friends?

104 posted on 05/04/2002 10:46:30 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"Less so, but we've had our moments."

Sorta like eating the chocolate cake, but not letting ya "lick the spoon"?? ;-)

BTW, IMO "outsiders" must respect who were the one and original founders of the ideal of America and it's Constitution, and thus its heritage -- for the most part, English Christians. Who's treated massive immigration better in the history of mankind?

105 posted on 05/04/2002 10:46:47 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Sorta like eating the chocolate cake, but not letting ya "lick the spoon"?? ;-)

What does this mean?

BTW, IMO "outsiders" must respect who were the one and original founders of the ideal of America and it's Constitution, and thus its heritage -- for the most part, English Christians. Who's treated massive immigration better in the history of mankind?

Well, to be fair, massive immigration was necessary to make the country function from the outset. It was empty after all. And the same English Christians who were very pro-immigration when we were nearly empty seem to be Pat Buchanan-ing on us now that we are pretty full.

106 posted on 05/04/2002 10:50:49 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Of course, you may be right about the social disadvantages of denying God. But you can never prove it nor suport the contention, except by citing your highly subjective conviction that all good things flow from God.

If you genuinely believe that, then you must be a dualist (which I doubt you are) because, by logical extension, all bad things must flow from somewhere else, which would make Old Scratch co-equal with God. It's an interesting theological point to argue, but essentially irrelevant.

Societies that deny free speech and property rights, on the other hand, have long, indeed inevitable, records of despotism, decay and disintegration. Such is the demonstrable result of denying liberty. God makes a pleasant neighbor, but property rights make the neighborhood in the first place.

107 posted on 05/04/2002 10:52:01 PM PDT by Big Bunyip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: discostu
If they want to know why people are leaving Christianity for Wicca instead of claiming Wicca is putting the masses under some evil spell they should look at the face Christianity presents.

Wicca, or Druidism, is a religion which has practised human sacrifice in any society in which it has held power (the last one being Pictish Scotland). The reason people are leaving Christianity for Wicca is the same reason people are leaving Christianity for Scientology. which is generally that, like most people in the elite levels of society, they have no more knowledge of Christianity than you do, which is, as you have demonstrated, precious little.

108 posted on 05/04/2002 10:54:00 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Thomas Jefferson seems to be the only "Founding Father" along with Benjamin Franklin cited to be mere Deists...

Adams, Madison, Webster, a huge majority of the signees of the Declaration of Independence, and other "genuine" Christian forefathers seem to be conveniently ignored.

Nonetheless, while they all envisioned a nation of citizens respecting the faith of others, I can't imagine they imagined any Wiccan governors or town Elders. Ever.

109 posted on 05/04/2002 10:56:26 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Okay, I'll put you in the "Don't Like It" column when it comes to religious freedom. You prefer a Christian Nation.

As I said before, tough. The country was founded because of religious freedom.

110 posted on 05/04/2002 11:02:13 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"What does this mean? [licking the spoon]"

Having it great isn't good enough, Utopia preferred of course...

"The same English Christians who were very pro-immigration when we were nearly empty seem to be Pat Buchanan-ing on us now that we are nearly full."

Yeah, yeah I know -- Pat Buchanan is a neo-Nazi as are all who "think" like him...Anyway your position apparently is to open the borders and invite every culturally and morally backwards, Third World immigrant who unilaterally decides settling in America is his God-given right?

Naaah -- don't think so.

111 posted on 05/04/2002 11:12:16 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Having it great isn't good enough, Utopia preferred of course...

Whether things are presently good for American Jews or not is not the point. I am pointing out that intolerance for (IMO) oddball religions such as Wicca or Paganism or even Islam means the door is open for intolerance for more and more religions, and history shows us that Judaism is eventually always in the crosshairs. That is my point, not the manufactured point that "Judaism is presently not tolerated."

Yeah, yeah I know -- Pat Buchanan is a neo-Nazi as are all who "think" like him...Anyway your position apparently is to open the borders and invite every culturally and morally backwards, Third World immigrant who unilaterally decides settling in America is his God-given right?

No. You are putting words in my mouth and I believe that is unsanitary.

Again, you are missing my point. You said that it was Christianity that made people tolerant of immigration. I refuted by saying it was a nearly empty country that made people tolerant of immigration, and if you look at modern-day Christians, such as yourself or Messr. Buchanan, you will see that many Christians no longer hold a pro-immigration view.

Thusly, I believe I have effectively refuted the assertion that religious persuasion played a role in tolerance of immigration.

112 posted on 05/04/2002 11:19:30 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"As I said before, tough. The country was founded because of religious freedom."

Yeah, and who were these "founders" creating this "religious freedom"? Muslims? Wiccans? Buddhists? Jews?

You can't change history. Too bad...

113 posted on 05/04/2002 11:20:16 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Yeah, and who were these "founders" creating this "religious freedom"? Muslims? Wiccans? Buddhists? Jews?

It does not matter what they were. They were leaving for a higher purpose than the establishment of one particular religion. They were leaving for religious freedom, which is much more noble than leaving for one particular religion.

And I, for one, thank them for their noble purpose. I can practice my Judaism unmolested and freely, with no fear.

Why, they felt so strongly about religious freedom, that they wrote "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Too bad for you, that you can't change history.

114 posted on 05/04/2002 11:25:18 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Tomalak
Sounds like Wicca is a soft synthetic "pagan" mixture of nature worship, self-actualization, feminism and liberalism. You can also find a hard paganism suggested by Robert Kaplan in his Atlantic articles and book as a support for empire. That looks more like his own dream than anything likely to take root here.

Of course Wicca is a silly pseudo-religion, but it accords with feminism that has shaped American life over the last three decades. It may even pick up devotees. Western monotheisms have been getting a bad press lately, what with Middle Eastern terrorism and sex scandals at home.

115 posted on 05/04/2002 11:48:42 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Morality is completely independant of religion.
I offer, as example, Islam.

This is a good example of morality being completely dependant on religion. A good religion leads to a state capable of civic virtue. An evil religion, which is what the Islamists have, has lead to all of the violence, cruelty, and corruption, not to mention lack of liberty, so pervasive in virtually all Islamic countries save Turkey, which has a secular state, and has suppressed the evil nature of the religious leaders.

Like Wicca, Islam seems to be based, in its mainline form, on sensuality, which is why they promise their 'heroes' virgins to be deflowered in paradise.

116 posted on 05/05/2002 12:08:56 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla; EternalVigilance
Because of your reluctance to decipher or discuss C.S. Lewis, I didn't bother on the Logical Inversions thread to direct your attention to this that I posted.

Closing lines of Men Without Chests:

However, when I see you taking on some these "schooled" as he warned, I ache for you. I know you predict the end of our culture. You say you must fight the trend, but do you dread it enough? Perhaps much of your gloom stems from your own self-imposed limits? Maybe you haven't confronted these questions? You know the answers to all.

Here and there you have one who seems positively proud to have not been reached, as if having eluded some debilitating disease. And while you offer to them charitable counter-argument, you are lacking Lewis' insights and counsel.

From Lewis' Miracles:

We live in an age where the malignant effectively mislead by appealing to the present generation's unwarranted vanity. "We live at the most informed time to date." But how many are informed broadly themselves. Far too few you can be sure.

I wonder how many of these fools would think they're more brilliant than Isaac Newton, who in half self deprecation, half modesty, but all confidence, explained "If I have perhaps seen further than other men, it's because I've stood on the shoulders of giants." Some in our generation and the next see no need to be modest nor any need for self-skepticism. Sadly, not only ignoramuses are so easily misled.

As always, general, I commend your efforts. I wish I could imbue more useful knowledge at the snap of my figures. Alas, that must be incorporated, thru labor, by the one feeling the need to respond. "...but can't make him drink."

Peace.

Av

117 posted on 05/05/2002 12:49:32 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Big Bunyip
Of course, you may be right about the social disadvantages of denying God. But you can never prove it nor suport the contention, except by citing your highly subjective conviction that all good things flow from God.

Some truths are self-evident.

If you genuinely believe that, then you must be a dualist (which I doubt you are) because, by logical extension, all bad things must flow from somewhere else, which would make Old Scratch co-equal with God. It's an interesting theological point to argue, but essentially irrelevant.

In this you are correct; I am no dualist. I'm not quite sure what the rest of your statement means. Perhaps I am slow of mind at 3 am, or perhaps you are being obtuse. I will leave that for others to judge.

Societies that deny free speech and property rights, on the other hand, have long, indeed inevitable, records of despotism, decay and disintegration. Such is the demonstrable result of denying liberty. God makes a pleasant neighbor, but property rights make the neighborhood in the first place.

Again, it is my contention that you are putting the cart before the horse. True freedom flows when the True God is trusted and relied upon. Those who willfully deny Him, and thrust him away, at the same moment thrust away all of His blessings...one of the first of which is freedom.

I will post one bit of scripture to back up this contention...a passage I believe to be utterly correct, and explanatory of much of the misery caused by unbelieving men, particularly in the past century:

"Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty."

118 posted on 05/05/2002 1:22:58 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
You've got Freepmail!
119 posted on 05/05/2002 1:39:29 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Wonderful post. Regards.
120 posted on 05/05/2002 1:42:07 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson