Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chen Liangyu Mayor of Shanghai
English News, China Central Television ^ | February 27, 2002 | English News, China Central Television

Posted on 05/03/2002 5:58:28 PM PDT by Hopalong

Chen Liangyu Elected Shanghai Mayor

WED, FEB 27, 2002

    

Chen Liangyu, acting mayor of Shanghai, was elected Tuesday mayor of this east China metropolis at the fifth session of the 11th Shanghai Municipal People's Congress.

Chen, 56, is a native of Ningbo, east China's Zhejing Province. He studied in the Chinese People's Liberation Army's Logistic Engineering Institute from 1963 to 1968. He also took positions in factories and government bodies.

The newly elected mayor acted as deputy secretary of Shanghai Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China and vice mayor of Shanghai before he was appointed acting mayor of Shanghai on December 2001.

Chen studied at Birmingham University in the Great Britain from January to September 1992.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; shanghai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: voronin, Sawdring, maui_hawaii
Merely by the way, #20, as it seems to me, is what's ultimately behind the recent ultmatum about Australian submarines.

"Commonwealth," my ears.

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

21 posted on 05/07/2002 6:58:12 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: all
Oops—"ultimatum."

Regards to all. S&W R.I.P.

22 posted on 05/07/2002 7:05:18 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
I disagree with that Hop. That piece on the Diesel Sub maker in Australia made it sound like China was threatening Australia. As if her interests were going to be harmed if it went to the US. If it was purely economic they would increase their bid and wouldn't threaten. In my opinion (humble) the big reason is the Bush administration wants to sell submarines to Taiwan, this sale will help the US to do that and China doesn't want it to happen.
23 posted on 05/07/2002 7:37:51 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
"I disagree with that Hop. That piece on the Diesel Sub maker in Australia made it sound like China was threatening Australia. As if her interests were going to be harmed if it went to the US. If it was purely economic they would increase their bid and wouldn't threaten. In my opinion (humble) the big reason is the Bush administration wants to sell submarines to Taiwan, this sale will help the US to do that and China doesn't want it to happen."

We don't disagree—of course that's the real reason. The nature of the threat, and the means used to make it convincing, is what I was talking about.

The Brits and Aussies too are up to their ears in mainland investment.

Then there's Prince Murdoch Jr., who declared that "China" needs an authoritarian regime, hehe. Yep, might as well be the Commies, eh?

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

24 posted on 05/07/2002 7:58:56 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Enemy of the State, maui_hawaii, LarryLied, Sawdring, eureka!, soccer8, Poohbah
On the surface, some of the ChiCom threats seem almost comic, as with a paranoid schizophrenic with a pistol to his head shouting, "Do what I say or we'll shoot!"

The problem lies with all the seemingly influential folks who depend upon the maniac as their one and only overseas snakeheads.

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

25 posted on 05/07/2002 8:38:40 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
I've often wondered whether some of the Italians—Broccoli, Ponti—involved in producing the James Bond movies were having their own little inside joke in the way 007 dressed.

The tuxes were okay, but some of the suits.

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

26 posted on 05/07/2002 8:59:07 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
The problem lies with all the seemingly influential folks who depend upon the maniac as their one and only overseas snakeheads.

Comical at best...

Lets just assume that China decides to get really ticked and 'pull the trigger'...

What are they really gonna do? Bar Aussie factories from setting up shop in China? What? Refuse to export to Australia?

With characters like Rumsfeld at the helm they don't dare start shooting. I like it that way...

At best they can get ticked off... but little else...

27 posted on 05/07/2002 9:05:04 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
China's power is not from within China, its from without...
28 posted on 05/07/2002 9:07:52 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
007???!!!

I was thinking Mr. Bean...

29 posted on 05/07/2002 9:08:49 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
Many of the corporations are doing business on the mainland for one reason, and one reason alone—it is the only and easiest way they can think of to make larger profit margins, almost exclusively by taking advantage of the cheap labor in production for export.

The prospect of a huge mainland domestic market for consumer goods is mainly an illusion. Some of the corporations doing business there know it. Others perhaps do not—yet. In and of itself, there is nothing wrong with profit. Contra Galbraith, that is the whole point of being in business.

But as you say, they have a very manipulative, political, and subversive silent partner, the CCP, which is desperately interested in much more than current bottom lines—indeed, in some important ways and over the long term their main interest is not bottom lines at all.

This is, however, only part a small part of the problem in my opinion The real threats are the irresistibly appetizing, but mostly false, financial and banking carrots, which are at the heart of the pyramid scheme and which translate into direct and indirect foreign political and military leverage for the CCP.

Hop, You just educated many people on the whole crux of the entire situation...mega bump. Excellent.

30 posted on 05/07/2002 9:12:44 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Nah—but's it's not an empty threat to select interests, say, some of the banks and financial institutions and various corporations, Aussie, Pommie and "mother country" Brit.

'Course I'm no expert on Australia. Far from it—I'm still trying to figure out why they gave up most of their firearms in the outback.

But, then again, I am still wondering when the Canadians are going to divorce themselves from the Hudson Bay Company mentality too, hehe.

Shell games and Ponzi schemes aside, I am quite obviously a little behind the times.

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

31 posted on 05/07/2002 9:16:50 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
"007???!!! I was thinking Mr. Bean..."

LOL. You can't blame everything on the Brits, hoho.

Now is that a real poncho, or is that a Sears poncho?

One upon a time you could easily learn the best buys along that line from the fishermen of Gloucester, New Bedford and Fall River, or the Islands, as well as of Maine.

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

32 posted on 05/07/2002 9:27:27 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Nowadays it's hard to find a thick, still decently oiled wool turtleneck, except maybe from Ireland.

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

33 posted on 05/07/2002 9:41:06 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
Re: #30...

The 'bottom line' for the CCP... survival

As far as the turtle necks go, yeah, back in the old days when I was a boy (1980s) you could get a good one for $20 bucks or so... or so I've heard... hee hee...

34 posted on 05/07/2002 9:54:13 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
"The 'bottom line' for the CCP... survival..."

Right on the nose, maui_hawaii.

Ultimately, at everyone else's expense.

Best regards. SW R.I.P.

35 posted on 05/07/2002 10:10:50 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii; Hopalong
"indeed, in some important ways and over the long term [the CCP's] main interest is not bottom lines at all."

Emphasis on the long term and a very patient people. Development projects: acquisition of navy/shipping lanes and ICBM/missile technology. These do not speak to economic goals.

BTW, very interesting thread and discussions.

36 posted on 05/08/2002 10:42:19 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: magister, maui_hawaii, eureka!, Enemy of the State, LarryLied, color_tear
Hopalong:"The prospect of a huge mainland domestic market for consumer goods is mainly an illusion."

Magister:"If this is true, why do people spend so much time and energy arguing China represents a threat? For a country that ultimately presents no economic (and thus military) threat, people sure have got their panties in a bunch about China...."

Equitum aut peditum?

Your fallacies are showing, merely by the way.

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

38 posted on 05/08/2002 4:07:25 PM PDT by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson