Posted on 05/03/2002 5:58:28 PM PDT by Hopalong
WED, FEB 27, 2002
Chen Liangyu, acting mayor of Shanghai, was elected Tuesday mayor of this east China metropolis at the fifth session of the 11th Shanghai Municipal People's Congress.
Chen, 56, is a native of Ningbo, east China's Zhejing Province. He studied in the Chinese People's Liberation Army's Logistic Engineering Institute from 1963 to 1968. He also took positions in factories and government bodies.
The newly elected mayor acted as deputy secretary of Shanghai Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China and vice mayor of Shanghai before he was appointed acting mayor of Shanghai on December 2001.
Chen studied at Birmingham University in the Great Britain from January to September 1992.
"Commonwealth," my ears.
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
Regards to all. S&W R.I.P.
We don't disagreeof course that's the real reason. The nature of the threat, and the means used to make it convincing, is what I was talking about.
The Brits and Aussies too are up to their ears in mainland investment.
Then there's Prince Murdoch Jr., who declared that "China" needs an authoritarian regime, hehe. Yep, might as well be the Commies, eh?
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
The problem lies with all the seemingly influential folks who depend upon the maniac as their one and only overseas snakeheads.
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
The tuxes were okay, but some of the suits.
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
Comical at best...
Lets just assume that China decides to get really ticked and 'pull the trigger'...
What are they really gonna do? Bar Aussie factories from setting up shop in China? What? Refuse to export to Australia?
With characters like Rumsfeld at the helm they don't dare start shooting. I like it that way...
At best they can get ticked off... but little else...
I was thinking Mr. Bean...
The prospect of a huge mainland domestic market for consumer goods is mainly an illusion. Some of the corporations doing business there know it. Others perhaps do notyet. In and of itself, there is nothing wrong with profit. Contra Galbraith, that is the whole point of being in business.
But as you say, they have a very manipulative, political, and subversive silent partner, the CCP, which is desperately interested in much more than current bottom linesindeed, in some important ways and over the long term their main interest is not bottom lines at all.
This is, however, only part a small part of the problem in my opinion The real threats are the irresistibly appetizing, but mostly false, financial and banking carrots, which are at the heart of the pyramid scheme and which translate into direct and indirect foreign political and military leverage for the CCP.
Hop, You just educated many people on the whole crux of the entire situation...mega bump. Excellent.
'Course I'm no expert on Australia. Far from itI'm still trying to figure out why they gave up most of their firearms in the outback.
But, then again, I am still wondering when the Canadians are going to divorce themselves from the Hudson Bay Company mentality too, hehe.
Shell games and Ponzi schemes aside, I am quite obviously a little behind the times.
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
LOL. You can't blame everything on the Brits, hoho.
Now is that a real poncho, or is that a Sears poncho?
One upon a time you could easily learn the best buys along that line from the fishermen of Gloucester, New Bedford and Fall River, or the Islands, as well as of Maine.
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
The 'bottom line' for the CCP... survival
As far as the turtle necks go, yeah, back in the old days when I was a boy (1980s) you could get a good one for $20 bucks or so... or so I've heard... hee hee...
Right on the nose, maui_hawaii.
Ultimately, at everyone else's expense.
Best regards. SW R.I.P.
Emphasis on the long term and a very patient people. Development projects: acquisition of navy/shipping lanes and ICBM/missile technology. These do not speak to economic goals.
BTW, very interesting thread and discussions.
Magister:"If this is true, why do people spend so much time and energy arguing China represents a threat? For a country that ultimately presents no economic (and thus military) threat, people sure have got their panties in a bunch about China...."
Equitum aut peditum?
Your fallacies are showing, merely by the way.
Best regards. S&W R.I.P.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.