Posted on 05/02/2002 2:58:33 PM PDT by Doc Anonymous
May 3, 2002
Volume 5, Number 19
UN Child Summit Negotiations Stymied Over Adolescent Abortion
¨ The Bush administration's delegation to the United Nations is continuing its efforts to roll back radical policy initiatives undertaken during the 1990s by the Clinton administration, the European Union (EU), Canada and other like-minded states. In this week's final preparatory meetings for the Special Session of the General Assembly on Children, to be held May 8-10 in New York City, the United States delegation has fought to exclude language from the outcome document that recognizes homosexual marriage and the right of adolescents to abortion.
¨ Much of the US's efforts have focused on the phrase "reproductive health services." In negotiations, the EU, Canada and the Latin American countries have sought to establish that children possess a "right to reproductive health services." Reproductive health services is a euphemism for abortion, a point conceded in June by the Canadian delegate, who stated that "Of course it includes, and I hate to say the word, but it includes abortion."
¨ Since the June admission by the Canadian delegation that "reproductive health care services" means abortion, the US has insisted upon its removal from the final document. Ten months later the US still insists, despite enormous pressure from its EU allies. Key Bush constituencies remain adamant that the phrase must be removed. The negotiations are deadlocked on this point.
¨ Peter Smith, the UN representative of International Right to Life, told the Friday Fax that "The US is doing a brilliant job" during this week's negotiations, and that "the delegation is following the administration's pro-life position wonderfully." Smith added that "The final document is to be called a 'A World Fit For Children'; the US believes that a world cannot be fit for children if it allows the world's most vulnerable children to be killed."
¨ The US delegation is also fighting against continued efforts to redefine the family. During the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in Cairo, the phrase "various forms of the family" was introduced into UN lexicon. All through the 1990s, the Clinton administration and the EU sought to include this phrase whenever the family was mentioned. It has long been the contention of pro-family nongovernmental organizations at the UN that this is an attempt to introduce homosexual marriage into international instruments. During the current negotiations, the US is seeking to delete a reference to "various forms of the family."
¨ Finally, the US is trying to introduce a profoundly different way to address all reproductive issues, which includes the recognition of the "importance of sound value systems" and the promotion of abstinence. Pro-family groups hope that the US will place many reservations in the final document, since so much of the UN language reflects the previous administration's understanding of family and parental rights. [Reservations attached to the end of a document allow a government to define or distance itself from specific language it disagrees with.] Negotiations on the final draft continue, with negotiators hoping to finish by next Wednesday, when up to 80 heads of state descend upon UN headquarters for the final Summit.
The US is holding firm on abortion in the UN Child Summit negotiations that are going on as we speak a mere hundred yards from here. The EU insists that adolescents need access to "reproductive health services" which was defined a year ago as including abortion. The US says no, as does the Holy See and the Arab states.
Spread the word.
Yours sincerely,
Austin Ruse President
Action item: Pray that the US holds firms against "reproductive health services" for children.
P.S. Pray today for Frances Kissling and her staff.
I'd like to note that, under the Bush administration, one of the first things to come out of the budget was something like $80 million (guesstimate - don't remember the exact amount) of US taxpayer "aid" which would have paid for the abortions of women and children all over the world.
The Arabs? Surprising, but a pleasant surprise. Well, I guess I have seen it all today...Arabs opposing abortion and Israel giving their soldiers "the morning after pill".
patent
Back in the dark days of the Clinton administration the Arab states and the Holy See worked very hard and very effectively to combat much of the garbage. They often had help from some of the third world, esp. the Catholic third world. The addition of the US to the team gives it muscle.The US says no, as does the Holy See and the Arab states.The Arabs? Surprising, but a pleasant surprise. Well, I guess I have seen it all today...Arabs opposing abortion and Israel giving their soldiers "the morning after pill".
patent +AMDG
Thanks for doing so.
EODGUY
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.