FIRST PERSON - A REAL EDUCATION: When a Reporter Becomes a Teacher, She Learns Something

FIRST PERSON - A REAL EDUCATION:

When a Reporter Becomes a Teacher, She Learns Something

One sunny July morning in 1999, on a whim, I called the Philadelphia School district and made an appointment with a recruiter. I thought of myself as a reporter, but I was looking for a job. Like many cities suffering from a teacher shortage, Philadelphia still needed 1,200 teachers and was taking almost anyone with a college degree. I had written hundreds of stories about education and always harbored an interest in teaching. Still, I'd never considered actually doing it, until then. "We need you more than you need us," the recruiter said. He gave me a folder of paperwork including a background check for the state police, and there wasn't much more involved.

I had mixed feelings. My colleagues at The Philadelphia Inquirer -- we were finishing a two-year reporting program there -- were heading to staff positions at papers like the Orlando Sentinel and the Raleigh News & Observer. I didn't want to throw away the journalism career I'd worked hard for since my college newspaper days. I'd interned unpaid through college and reported for a year from Chile, primarily for AP/Dow Jones. When I returned, the Inquirer hired me as one of its "two-year correspondents" to cover southern Chester County, Pennsylvania, a beat that included three school districts, twenty-seven townships, and a mushroom industry that employed 10,000 Mexican immigrants. I gravitated to school stories out of interest and a sense that they were important. From my suburban outpost, I made page one occasionally by regionalizing a story on subjects like revolving-door principals or questionable strategies to raise test scores. But I always felt uncertain about my stories about schools, as though I were guessing at what was really happening inside them.

When the two years ended, I interviewed for a staff position on the Inquirer's city education desk, but the beat went to an education reporter with a decade of experience. Meanwhile, my affection for newspapers was waning; there had been a lot of deflating news about corporate ownership and declining circulation. At age twenty-five, I was already questioning if newspaper journalism could be the vehicle for change I wanted it to be. I was eager to make a difference.

So, when I saw the article about the teacher shortage I got excited. If I taught for a year I would be able to see the real issues firsthand. I could have an effect on education in a way I wasn't having with journalism. And I wasn't throwing away my career, I reasoned, because if I wanted to come back to newspapers, I would be an even stronger education reporter. I decided to do it. Six weeks later, I stepped into my story.

My school was Julia de Burgos Bilingual Middle Magnet School, a 100-year-old stone building in The Badlands, the nickname for a heroin-ravaged Puerto Rican neighborhood in North Philadelphia. City test scores ranked it as the worst middle school in the city. At my first teachers' meeting in September, the new principal, Jayne Gibbs, warned us, "We can't fail any special-education students this year because the government is breathing down our neck." As the teachers nodded and murmured, I sheepishly glanced around. I needed to remind myself that I wasn't a reporter sneaking into a meeting. Other teachers were talking openly to me, without that guarded, clipped manner that I was accustomed to. To them, I was Ms. Asquith, a sixth grade bilingual teacher, with a classroom of forty desks, two blackboards, bars over the windows, and a scenic view of the boiler room roof.

My sixth graders ranged in age from ten to fourteen, and were mostly first- or second-generation Puerto Ricans. Half the class spoke little or no English. The first week, the school was still missing another sixth grade teacher so I got two classes. They shuffled in carrying composition notebooks and wearing puffy jackets, tapered jeans, and Timberland boots. They called me "miss," and were shy, obedient, and eager to please. They wanted stickers for their notebooks and to read the Harry Potter books. A couple of boys wore gangster-style skullcaps and looked tough, but beyond appearances, they were not the drug-dealing street-toughs fitting my stereotype.

My journalistic interests were immediately eclipsed by the reality and enormity of teaching. I had Jose, a thirteen-year old boy from the Dominican Republic, who spoke mostly Spanish and had been left back twice already; Darnell, a mentally troubled boy who jumped out of his seat constantly; and Evelyn, a diligent, articulate eleven-year old who aspired to be a doctor. I didn't know how to teach a lesson, let alone how to teach a class with such a range in abilities.

The school didn't help. When I asked the vice principal for a curriculum, I was promised one that never appeared. By the fourth week, I was finally given a set of grammar textbooks and a set of social studies textbooks, but they were too difficult for my English-as-a-second-language students. I had to invent everything myself. When the Philadelphia Daily News ran a story in October reporting that 100 new teachers across the city had quit, complaining of lack of support and supplies, I understood. For the first few months, each day felt like a churning, eight-hour tempest. I invented lame writing assignments -- "What would you do with a million dollars?" -- and read Chicken Soup for the Kid's Soul. Several of the administrators were also new, and just as overburdened by the remaining seven teacher vacancies. Whether and what I taught were secondary concerns to them. So I used my journalism skills, asked a lot of questions of other teachers, and wrote everything down. A significant handful of teachers were so incompetent that it was dangerous. They screamed at the students all day and created a climate of fear, abuse, and violence. But by November, I was finally picking up enough tricks and materials from the good ones to put together a semblance of a daily lesson. I got by with the help of my nicer colleagues, who amazed me with their ingenuity. In my class, instead of the typical reading and writing assignments we read newspaper and magazine articles, and wrote letters to the editor. The Daily News printed a short letter from one of my most easily discouraged students. Seeing his face light up pushed me forward.

At night, after grading and planning, I wrote in a journal all that I was learning in my new world. Details I had never focused on as a journalist fascinated me, such as who kept student attendance and how easy it was to fudge upwards. Schools get higher ratings and award money from the state for high attendance, and as a teacher I saw how attendance could fluctuate depending on what time it's taken, whether suspended students are considered absent, and whether a school counts excused absences in its total.

And from the inside, I could see how some education stories really miss the mark. For example, in late winter the school board announced plans to spend millions of dollars on a new "discipline school," a place for kids with behavior problems. From an outsider's point of view, that might seem like a good idea. Indeed, our school had about thirty or forty students who needed to be removed. They roamed the hallways, picking fights, threatening teachers with scissors, and destroying the learning environment. These students were often victims of abuse themselves and needed help. But they remained in our school year after year. The problem was not a lack of discipline schools. The fact was that the city's existing discipline schools were half empty. The reason: the stacks and stacks of paperwork required by the city and state to transfer a dangerous student into one of the city's discipline schools. It could take up to eight months to put a transfer through, so few teachers bothered. When the Inquirer wrote a long feature story about the proposed new million-dollar discipline school, the article made only brief mention of the fact that the existing discipline schools were not being used, and no mention at all of the many roadblocks involved in moving a student to a discipline school.

The issues I had worried myself with, as a reporter, suddenly seemed quite esoteric and bureaucratic in comparison to what the students and teachers had to deal with. Most of my sources as a reporter had been administrators, union members, and school board members -- instead of students, parents, and teachers. And yet, much of what the school board dealt with was unrelated to what really happened on the ground. For example, the school board fussed for months over prohibiting social promotion, finally deciding that a failing student could not be passed on, regardless of age. Yet our principal is allowed to change grades, and about failing students she told us, "If you retain them we will have to deal with them again." When I turned in two failing report cards they came back to me with the grades raised.

Journalists' assumptions, I was finding out, can be off the mark. An example of this arose when I was given a $1,200 iMac computer for my classroom. As a reporter, I had written a number of stories involving the effort to put technology in the classroom, and just assumed it was a positive goal. I am now less certain. My class's computer collected dust in the back because one, two, even five computers are not that helpful with thirty-three kids. I always believed that increased funding would help schools, but now I saw how existing money was sometimes misspent. The sad truth was that many teachers used the computers to busy the tough-to-control special-education students so that they wouldn't destroy the school. A reporter is not likely to get that story from just talking to a school board member. What the school really needed was not fancy technology but someone to design a curriculum, coordinate the grades, and order appropriate books.

One morning I saw a thirteen-year-old girl crying in the hallway. The security guard was screaming at her, so I offered to walk her back to her classroom. Her name was Angela, she was mentally disabled, one of some seventy students placed in "special education classes" out of about 700 students in the school. When we reached her classroom I understood why she preferred the hallways. Students were fighting and overturning desks and the substitute teacher was shouting, "they're animals." The ceiling was peeling, and exposed nails stuck up from a piece of wood on the floor. Angela was attacked. When I turned to get help, I saw that the security guard was already there and had just been overpowered. This was not an emergency; this was a typical day for special-education students. Yet here was a kind of story that reporters tend not to find -- the routine and systematic abuse of special-ed students.

Later I learned that Angela's group was one of five special-education classes that would not have a teacher all year. They were bounced from room to room each period. One substitute pushed his desk in front of the door and turned on the TV. Occasionally, a substitute wouldn't show up, and the students were left alone in the room. In the spring, at a school in the same neighborhood, a girl in special education was raped during the school day. The overwhelming reaction at my school was "thank god it didn't happen here." But it easily could have. With no teacher or program, Angela and the other special-education students just ran loose in the hallways, starting fires that nearly torched the school, pushing and hospitalizing a teacher, molesting younger students, getting arrested, and shredding the learning environment for the rest of the students. We were dependent on the school district to find real special-education teachers, but it never sent us any. Much of the time of our special-education teacher was spent on completing paperwork that glossed over such problems. Indeed, when our special-ed program was reviewed by federal auditors in May, the school passed.

Seeing this abuse daily made me feel personally frustrated with the media, which -- while investigating the police and other public departments -- tended to treat the schools as a feature beat. In October, the Daily News wrote its "special report" about new teachers quitting. In the spring, there were stories about a rape and a shooting that occurred at two different schools, and in between there were many stories about contract negotiations and administrative matters. Not much about actual education, its successes or failures. And when something was written about the schools, it often carried the intonation that the students were at fault. After a vice principal was shot during a scuffle in a West Philadelphia school, the Daily News followed up with a cover story: why the schools are stuck with so many bad kids. It was illustrated with a shadowy image of a student lurking in the background. The underlying assumption -- that the students were to blame -- reflected a sentiment popular with many in the school board, teachers union, and the administration -- none of whom want to take responsibility for their failings. But what I experienced as a teacher showed me the opposite. The story should have read: why the kids are stuck with so many bad schools. The ongoing failure of our nation's urban school system is a scandal -- it's hurting millions of children, stealing from taxpayers, and creating violence and desperation that has a ripple effect on all corners of society. And it doesn't have to be that way. It's time for the education desk to shed its reputation as a soft beat, for reporters and editors to take a sharper pencil to the schools.

Having once dealt with deadlines, editors, and the pressure for copy, I feel I have some understanding of the complacency that affects the coverage of education. But I can no longer justify it. Too many reporters think that nothing can be done. They allow the protectors of the status quo to use sensitive issues of race and culture and poverty as a shield against their critics. They feed the sense of hopelessness that is encouraged by bad teachers, self-aggrandizing union leaders, and hapless administrators. All those things affected me, too, when I was a reporter. It took a classroom of them to convince me that the kids really do deserve a chance, and that they won't have one until the news organizations act as if they believe it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christina Asquith recently completed a book documenting her year inside Philadelphia's toughest middle school. She lives in New York and can be reached at Clasquith@ aol.com. Students names in this article were changed.

They called me "miss," and were shy, obedient, and eager to please. They wanted stickers for their notebooks and to read the Harry Potter books.
That does not sound correct, but if they were "eager to please" -good for the students. However, this liberal reporter, now just seeing the REALITY of our worst schools, probably voted in the very liberal extremists who created it in the first place. And, she is likely to CONTINUE. On the flip side, perhaps because she's a Reporter (Whoop-de-do) the other 95% liberal reporters might listen to her and start really investigating.

I think this reporter actually went through a significant change, based on her realization, for example, that she was previously interviewing the least knowledgable sources for her stories.

And, most students will give a teacher a chance as they test the waters. But, had she taught in 7th grade, instead of 6th grade, I wonder if she would have characterized the class as "eager to please." At that age, many students are far less interested in what their teachers think of them, than what their peers think of them.

Also, I'd worry about sending my child to a teacher who would accept less pay.

Discipline is better, the parents are probably easier to deal with, and the teachers likely don't have to teach the liberal crap that disgusts us all. ALL that would make it worth it. And their own kids typically get reduced tuition.

The SAT as you remember it is actually being phased out in some parts of the country, including, I believe, CA.

Goodness gracious, I was just being a smart-aleck. Let me guess, these places are phasing out the SAT because it is 'biased' against race/gender/etc.? Is the ACT still around? The ACT and the PSAT opened every door I could want, it sure would be a shame if kids didn't have those additional testing options. Especially immature Texas kids who make the mistake of sneaking out and toilet-papering their friends' houses until 5am the night before the SAT. Ferris Beuler spoke more truth than any parent at the time ever realized!

I think this reporter actually went through a significant change, based on her realization, for example, that she was previously interviewing the least knowledgable sources for her stories.

But isn't it amazing that she didn't realize this in the first place? She doesn't seem to be lacking in intellect, but I haven't met very many bright people who were so un-curious. She just accepted that computers were good, that more money was necessary and that administrators were the best people to get info from? I find that so odd.

What was that article? I wouldn't call that a reliable source. Do you really believe 40% of public school teachers send their kids to private schools? I doubt that 40% of public school teachers have kids let alone send them to private schools. Personally, I'd rather send my child to public school, exercise my right as a parent to investigate the facilities, teachers and administrators and be involved. I know there is a standard being met. I know that most of the teachers are competent, caring and interested. I teach. I see what goes on, I watch the politics, and like many professions I know there are a few bad apples spoiling the barrel. I agree that public education needs something new. The system is failing. But the problems cannot be solved by charter schools. People wake up and do your homework. Charter schools receive some education money. Enough that someone out to make a buck can start one up as a business. That takes money away from public education, and in my opinion, weakens both. To poor families in inner cities, this may seem a balancing of opportunity, but in the long run I believe they will be the losers again.

I just hope it does a little good-- we have some rather nasty problems here with the schools- largely involving missing money and probably corruption, but getting it reported, or investigated, is so far going nowhere. The parents- and taxpayers- don't seem to want to hear about it.

Personally, I'd rather send my child to public school, exercise my right as a parent to investigate the facilities, teachers and administrators and be involved.

Then by all means, I suggest you go right on ahead and send your kid to public school. But there are many of us here who feel very strongly that public school is not only a waste of our kids time, but counterproductive and dangerous as well. And we've come to resent people of your opinion who have tried to limit our options for our children. At first trying to make homeschooling illegal, fighting educational vouchers, frowning on charter schools-- people unable to see the state of public education, trying to force the rest of us to remain in that failed system...

OK; here is another source, The National Center for POlicy Analysis, that say the same thing about:
public school teachers sending their kids to private schools.

If you would like to do a search on google to find 54 other sources that say the same thing, just enter: "public school teachers send their children to private school." As I said initially -- it is a well known fact.

this attitude shows up earlier and earlier. Some 5th grade classes I've taught have been angels, others more like gang members. VERY different in personality.

I'd say you are absolutely correct in this assessment here, as I have noticed the same.

I would add that I've seen this LESS often in schools that are grades K-8, as opposed to K-5.

Personally, I'd rather send my child to public school, exercise my right as a parent to investigate the facilities, teachers and administrators and be involved.

You are right that it is often easier to investigate a public school than a private school. However, I personally am for everything -- public, private, charter, homeschooling; in short, whatever works for that child and parent. And, I will always support public schools, but I disagree that public schools alone must be the required option for everyone. Many people, including folks on this forum, have found that they use a mix of options in educating their children, and I think that's good too.

But isn't it amazing that she didn't realize this in the first place?

I had that same thought, Dianna, but you and I are teachers and see things differently than a reporter. A reporter thinks if he or she asks someone with a title what is going on, that person, by virtue of the title, show know. However, as you and I know, and this reporter discovered, the people who often know more are: the teachers, students and many parents.

BTW -- That's why I have to laugh when a candidate -- like Dem candidate McBride in this FL gov race -- promises he will put a new office of the teachers union right next to his in Tallahassee, if he is elected governor. To me, that promise translates as follows: "I promise I will be even more out of touch with teachers than most governors." LOL.... :)

BTW, I saw earlier that the last 5 FL 'Teachers of the Year' endorsed Bush. How is that honor determined, and isn't it likely that the teacher's union will manipulate the voting for or selection of this year's winner to be sure that he/she/it is an outspoken Democrat critical of Bush?

I believe it is determined by the FL Dept of Education, and as such, the union is not involved in that choice.

What I find so fascinating about these teachers is that this group of five includes: 1 Dem, 1 independent and 3 GOP, and not all five were selected by a FL Dept of Ed under Jeb's term as governor. Two of these five teachers were honored during the former Dem governor's administration. But, all five are coming out strongly supporting Gov. Bush. Thanks for asking about them. :)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.