1 posted on
04/25/2002 10:31:46 AM PDT by
rwfok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: rwfok
Tiger Woods is a class act regardless of his politics.
To: rwfok
So why do athletes tend to lean right? My guess is because in sports, merit reigns supreme. There are no quotas or affirmative action policies to ensure that the NBA, the NFL or Major League Baseball "look like America." Sport is uncompromisingly results-oriented. Outcomes are based on performance and efficacy is measured in cold, cold statistics. There are no championship rings for "most diverse offensive line" or "most multicultural starting rotation." Field an inferior team and youll lose. Its that simple. It doesnt matter what feel-good politics caused you to put your particular lineup on the field.
Great article. I enjoyed it immensely.
3 posted on
04/25/2002 10:37:08 AM PDT by
Gophack
To: rwfok
"Progressive" of course means liberal. NOT true! In the early 1900's communism was having a hard time getting a foothold in the USA. Progressive was substituted for the word communism to make it more palatable for the sheep.
Progressive means Communist. Communists invented the word as used in the political sense.
4 posted on
04/25/2002 10:37:34 AM PDT by
eFudd
To: rwfok
This is kind of humorous considering Tiger doesn't really consider himself to be "black".
7 posted on
04/25/2002 10:43:07 AM PDT by
FreeTally
To: rwfok
Nothing makes a Republican out of you faster than seeing the tax bite on your income. These athletes make good money, and they want to keep it just as much as the rest of us do.
8 posted on
04/25/2002 10:43:29 AM PDT by
blau993
To: rwfok
Great article, thanks for posting.
10 posted on
04/25/2002 10:46:13 AM PDT by
agrace
To: rwfok
To: rwfok
The irony is I bet Tiger Woods spends very little time thinking about race, unlike the "progressives".
Who's the racist then?
To: rwfok
Good Read. I don't know Tiger's politics. That's fine by me.
To: rwfok
Thank you for this great post. I enjoyed reading it and intend to pass it along to as many people (who get it) as possible.
To: rwfok
When the NAACP pressured him to boycott a South Carolina tour event because the state still flies the Confederate flag, Tiger again ducked controversy. He didnt play the event, but he refused to be a ruse. He insisted he declined because the Hilton Head event didnt fit into his schedule, not because he was making a statement. Too bad he "ducked" in this instance with a dubious excuse, instead of telling the NAACP to take a flying leap.
To: rwfok
Also, Tiger's father was career US military..AF I think?..and the values of the career military tend favor the GOP.....and you'd think a little bit would have rubbed off on Tiger growing up.......OTOH..remember the commericals he made when he first turned pro..with the lines.."I'm playing on gold courses they wouldn't let me join a few years ago"..or something like that.....I think that Tiger was "fed" those lines..and he was uncomfortable with them...
35 posted on
04/25/2002 11:24:09 AM PDT by
ken5050
To: rwfok
The same classy Tiger Woods who stiffed his host last year (Joe Jemsek..who was REAL class act)at the Western Open ?
Tiger has had his foot-in-mouth moments.
So far, nobody from the black community has openly hammered him for his penchant for blond/blue-eyed girlfriends, but methinks it's coming.
To: rwfok
Great article. Tiger is very young to be so wise.
To: rwfok
There are few sports like golf where you don't get your sports salary based on last year, but based on this week's play--and there is an accepted metric for success. This makes golfers both the most meritocratic among athletes and the most Republican.
My guess is that Tiger is a DINO (democrat in name only).
50 posted on
04/25/2002 11:37:12 AM PDT by
Hagrid
To: rwfok
Sport is uncompromisingly results-oriented. Outcomes are based on performance and efficacy is measured in cold, cold statistics. There are no championship rings for "most diverse offensive line" or "most multicultural starting rotation." Field an inferior team and you'll lose. It's that simple. It doesn't matter what feel-good politics caused you to put your particular lineup on the field. I guess that is why police and fire departments across the nation are fielding officers that reflect the community. Policing and fighting fires must not be results-oriented and performance based [end_sarcasm]
To: rwfok;discostu
Hey, nice article. Thanks for posting.
discostu, I thought you might enjoy this read.
52 posted on
04/25/2002 11:38:04 AM PDT by
Boxsford
To: rwfok
When party activists tried to recruit Michael Jordan to campaign against North Carolina Senator Jesse Helms, Jordan declined, retorting with the glib line "Republicans buy shoes, too." Of course, that is the mindset of an expert marketer. Which brings up the question why the idiots in Hollywood contantly isolate large portions of the populations by their stupid actions and snide comments?
To: rwfok
So why do athletes tend to lean right? My guess is because in sports, merit reigns supreme.He's also an Army Brat, and soldiers tend to lean right as well.
To: rwfok
The left has been trying to push sports stars into politics for some time particularly African-American athletes. But they havent had much luck. While Republicans continue to field world-class Capitol Hill softball teams with athletes like J.C. Watts, Jim Ryun, Steve Largent, and Jim Bunning and have budding stars in the works with John Elway, Steve Young and Karl Malone the Democrats have mostly struck out. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to to see that pro athletes make a lot of money and want to keep it as much as any of us do. They see the same class warfare liberal democrat idiots ranting and raving about the "rich" being selfish, screwing the poor, etc. etc. A pro athlete making 10 mil. a year gives the govmint more in a year than most of us will pay in a lifetime. Not to mention most(?) athletes have set up foundations, charities, etc. to (gag) "give something back to the community."
Hollywood actors, on the other hand, are just stupid.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson