Skip to comments.
Employees arrested at D.C. airports
MSNBC NewsALert ^
| 4/23/02
| Pete Williams
Posted on 04/23/2002 11:11:59 AM PDT by ppaul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: ppaul
Why weren't agents making mass arrests at the Pro-Terrorist/anti-American rallies in DC on the weekend? Ashcroft and Ridge have asked us to report suspicious persons and activities. Such persons and activities abounded at the demonstrations. Nobel Peace Prize winner, Helen Caldicott, called the US a rogue state, dismissed Bush as illegitimate, branded Cheney and Rumsfeld as wicked, defended North Korea and Iraq, and condemned the War against Terror as racist. Other speakers called for the Infatada to be globalized and brought to the steps of the white house, a clear call to sedition. Are there no grounds for detaining and investigating at least some of these people? How long are Ashcroft/Ridge/Bush going to allow this subversion to go on in the name of the exercise of free speech?
41
posted on
04/23/2002 1:02:17 PM PDT
by
luvbach1
To: cardinal4
The truth?
the FBI has KNOWN about these folks for months... in the interim there have been numerous background checks and phone taps and investigations of these people's KNOWN ASSOCIATES which needed to be catalogued and surveilled FIRST...
An illegal "screener" at the airport can always be BLACKMAILED... and you can bet they have been. That is the first thing a terrorist would look for... identify the vulnerabilities and the vulnerable workers in key positions. The FBI and other Alphabets have without a doubt been checking these VULNERABLE illegal employees out via their bank accounts, their phone records their cell phone transactions and credit card purchases as well as any other items of interest. This has been necessary to make sure that all the terrorists KNOWN associates, recruited vulnerable associates and blackmail targets can NOW also be screened, traced, backgrounded, and potentially arrested/prosecuted as well. It is ongoing and unravelling as we speak.
ONE big city at a time. OR several... It's a surgical operation... as this cancer apparently runs very deep... and we risk killing the patient if we remove too much, too fast... It would be a foolish error made in haste of the moment, if we were to deal with the symptom and entirely miss the metastises that are hidden and ready to go "active" in the event of a mass roundup.... a stitch in time saves nine... later.
42
posted on
04/23/2002 1:11:20 PM PDT
by
eccl1212
To: ppaul
Three questions: did they also arrest the employers for hiring these illegals and since there are now vacancies for those positions will the companies hire U.S. citizens? (Or will they just get another boatload of illegals to replace the ones deported or arrested)?
43
posted on
04/23/2002 1:15:30 PM PDT
by
SBeck
To: luvbach1
Good questions. Should we abandon the first amendment while we're at it too?
44
posted on
04/23/2002 1:17:55 PM PDT
by
SBeck
To: ppaul
"Many of the suspects have out-of-status visas, a violation of immigration rules."Employees at US airports should be US citizens.
45
posted on
04/23/2002 1:28:48 PM PDT
by
NetValue
To: ppaul
I wonder if the gals at the Victoria Secret store at Reagan National were arrested. For some reason, I've never really looked much at their faces. :-)
To: Slip18
Did anybody listen to Ashcroft live? I thought everyone on FR hated his guts.
Glad to hear of arrests, though it's a bit unnerving to know that I just passed through one of those airports 10 days ago....
To: Mo1
When isn't Mexico mad at us Who gives a damn about Mexico.
48
posted on
04/23/2002 2:00:41 PM PDT
by
Dengar01
To: ppaul;OKCSubmariner;Wallaby;archy
Argenbright Security has the contracts for a lot of airports for security.
Not so well known is the fact that Argenbright is owned by Securicor.
Securicor has a branch at DUBAI, owned by an Arab!
Excuse me, but it is my allegation that terrorists working there stole passes, code, maps,ID's etc to help in their attacks!It is my thought that many of these arrested today are part of the terrorism deal!
49
posted on
04/23/2002 2:07:06 PM PDT
by
Betty Jo
To: ppaul
WHY DIDN'T THEY ARREST THE ONES WHO HIRE THEM?
To: Marine Inspector
so its OK then to have ILLEGAL non-citizens working in highly sensitive areas pertaining to national security?
I would tell them to **** ** ***** **** *** **** ***!!
To: ppaul
Now, are these people they're arresting federal employees yet?
52
posted on
04/23/2002 3:12:17 PM PDT
by
dr_who
To: prophetic
so its OK then to have ILLEGAL non-citizens working in highly sensitive areas pertaining to national security? No it is not, and I never implied that it was!!!
To: SBeck
No, don't abandon the 1st amendement, just don't let it be used as a cover for seditious activity.
54
posted on
04/23/2002 5:58:44 PM PDT
by
luvbach1
To: Marine Inspector
F MEXICO SEND EM PACKING BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM along with other illeagles
To: ppaul
Brand their foreheads and send them home - if we see them again they are fair game for anyone to shoot on sight.
Comment #57 Removed by Moderator
To: varon
I would classify anyone crossing/sneaking across our borders illegaly as an enemy...Works for me.
58
posted on
04/24/2002 7:56:48 AM PDT
by
Bigg Red
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson