Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited
Newsmax ^ | April 23,2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 04/22/2002 10:00:48 PM PDT by Kay Soze

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 641-655 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Don't get the big head just because you got the 500th post. You caught me napping. I wasn't really paying close attention. Everybody knows that it is the 1000th post that matters (although the 1700th and the 2000th posts are far more prestigious, as every informed person knows).
501 posted on 05/08/2002 6:56:58 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
Don't worry, the Big Ones are YOURS. I hope this time I'll be able to properly congratulate you.
502 posted on 05/08/2002 7:05:56 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
And on that note, I am going to bed. Keep the home fires burning. See all of you kiddoes tomorrow.
503 posted on 05/08/2002 7:09:34 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
Main Entry: po·lem·ic
Pronunciation: p&-'le-mik
Function: noun
Etymology: French polémique, from Middle French, from polemique controversial, from Greek polemikos warlike, hostile, from polemos war; perhaps akin to Greek pelemizein to shake, Old English ealfelo baleful
Date: 1638
1 a : an aggressive attack on or refutation of the opinions or principles of another b : the art or practice of disputation or controversy -- usually used in plural but sing. or plural in constr.
2 : an aggressive controversialist : DISPUTANT
- po·lem·i·cist /-'le-m&-sist/ noun

Isn't it odd that that is the way that Klayman AND FJIC use the same term, only Klayman is talking about people who he ADMITS criticize him for his press releases:

Klayman acknowledges, however, an effort to tone down his act, though not the volume of lawsuits, responding to supporters who have suggested that his press releases are too polemical.

I like this quote, too:

Despite his relentless pursuit of Clinton, Klayman, who draws a $250,000 annual salary from Judicial Watch, insists he doesn't hate the former president, whom he has seen face to face only once, at a formal dinner. "He was part of my generation. Even though we're ideologically different, I wanted him to succeed," Klayman said.

Klayman's opinion began to change, he said, when Clinton, in his first term, formed a legal defense fund and accepted contributions.

"You can't panhandle for money from the American people," said Klayman, a registered Republican who voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter in the wake of Watergate. The fund, he said, "opened a Pandora's box of people trying to influence them."

504 posted on 05/08/2002 7:11:08 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Can you please post links for those quotes?
505 posted on 05/08/2002 7:17:23 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
You, among others, are ruining this thread.
506 posted on 05/08/2002 7:17:54 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Ask Larry for the URL.
507 posted on 05/08/2002 7:18:31 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
You're sure doing your part to ruin them.
508 posted on 05/08/2002 7:19:10 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Your comments are rude and innappropriate.
509 posted on 05/08/2002 7:27:10 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist

Pot meet kettle.....

510 posted on 05/08/2002 7:28:33 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
If I agreed with you, they'd be fine.
511 posted on 05/08/2002 7:29:52 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: deport
I wasn't talking to you.
512 posted on 05/08/2002 7:30:07 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I always appreciate documentation, whether I agree with an issue or not.
513 posted on 05/08/2002 7:30:49 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What he hasn't got them posted on the 'eWW' website? I can't believe it or that he hasn't issued a press release and called a news conference to take questions about them....


514 posted on 05/08/2002 7:33:12 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
You, among others, are ruining this thread.

Freedom, you've already said, "First of all, I didn't post this thread."

You might want to remember, even if you had posted it, it's not your thread.

Secondly, you were spewing insults within the first 50 posts of the thread, so I'm not sure you have any room to talk about others "ruining" the thread.

515 posted on 05/08/2002 7:34:35 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist

What was the statement you made a while back up the thread about this being an open forum? Want to post it again for us. Nor does it seem to matter when you like to butt in when you're not being addressed either..... Pot meet Kettle.....

516 posted on 05/08/2002 7:35:12 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Well, you are right about that one. But they were relevant to the discussion at hand.
517 posted on 05/08/2002 7:36:26 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: deport, Howlin, Amelia
I think that I need to take another 6 month vacation away from you guys. Except this time, I won't cancel my screename.
518 posted on 05/08/2002 7:38:15 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist; deport
"No, you are not on trial, but you are posting on a public forum, which gives anyone the right to reply to your posts"
340 posted on 5/8/02 11:25 AM Central by FreedominJesusChrist

"I wasn't talking to you."
512 posted on 5/8/02 9:30 PM Central by FreedominJesusChrist

Or, "Kettle meet pot"?

519 posted on 05/08/2002 7:38:49 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist;chaser;beachooser;howlin
I don't believe that ChaseR will be happy with what has happened to this thread

lolololololol

hahahahaha

heeheeheehee

yeah, we filled a Judicial Watch thread with meaningful conversation, as opposed to your Larry Klayman butt kissing, BAC's misleading Ron Brown screeds and Chaser's BTTT's.

520 posted on 05/08/2002 7:45:12 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson