Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SKYSCRAPER CRASH IN MILAN ITALY
Fownews

Posted on 04/18/2002 9:06:38 AM PDT by Bommer

Just reported that a small engine plane crashed into a Skyscraper in Milan Italy


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: smallplanecrash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,201-1,208 next last
To: codebreaker
This is probably another #587 incident. 'Freak accident'/coincidence.

IF it WAS a planned crash and the 'official story' is saying it's an accident, then there should be quite a few po'ed diaperheads, who are fuming at losing their 'due credit'.

Are there any reports yet of plane parts coming out the other side and landing? And aren't there any alarm systems that would alert a pilot that there's a building/mountain/trees, etc directly in front of the plane?

861 posted on 04/18/2002 11:30:07 AM PDT by mommadooo3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
WTF? Why are we getting out of the U.S. Consulate?
862 posted on 04/18/2002 11:30:10 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: cyphergirl
Compared to this, it is....


863 posted on 04/18/2002 11:30:38 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
MSNBC going to coverage all afternoon, raising questions of a 'planejacking' perhaps

You know what .. after 9/11 ANYTHING is possible .. but I will say .. I also don't rely to much on the news stations to report the actual truth either

864 posted on 04/18/2002 11:30:40 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
You forgot about the people on the ground seeing the plane on fire.

Eyewitnesses don't count, even credible ones, as we learned from the AA Dominican plane that crashed last Fall.

865 posted on 04/18/2002 11:31:05 AM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Not to feed the conspiracy sharks or anything... but the 1993 WTC bombing was declared a 'transformer fire' accident for three days before it was acknowledged to be an intentional bombing.

The media reports seem to be following the damage-control script here, but this is going to be pretty tough to explain away.

866 posted on 04/18/2002 11:31:35 AM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
What model 52s?

Does it really matter? If it's not a fighter, it's a target...

867 posted on 04/18/2002 11:31:39 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies]

Comment #868 Removed by Moderator

To: Pooler
Now you guys sound like the French...refusing to accept facts. This was an accident. A twin engine can and did cause that much damage to a building. Get over it. It was an accident by a 70 year swiss man.

Why did those airline pilots crash their 747 into the WTC? I just cant imagine why they'd do such a thing. OH yah because their throats were cut by terrorist hijackers! Does it occur to you people that a 70 year old guy makes an easy target? Does it occur to you that distractions like engine trouble make good excuses for a plane flying where it is not supposed to be? Does it occur to you that hitting that building as it was hit is like the chances of being struck by lightning 10 times in a row?

869 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:02 AM PDT by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]

To: DJ88
"Crew 2 Pilots + 5 Scientists"

What's this .. where did you hear this ..

870 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:16 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: mommadooo3
Collision avoidance system? It's required in the big planes... optional/expensive for the smaller ones. Hell, we (Honeywell) just finally came up with a nice inexpensive weather system for the General Aviation guys... and they've been flying for how many years? *sigh*
871 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:22 AM PDT by cyphergirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
MSNBC Reporting: U.S. Consulate in Milan Being Evacuated.

A wise precaution, even if this is really an accident. Same with the closing of the Milan airport. Better safe than sorry.

872 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:23 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: Gorest Gump
If the 9/11 attacks had started 1 hour later, the death toll would have been much higher

My guess is that they wanted an early morning flight because people are not that alert. Also, the planes needed to be 767 or 757 fully loaded with fuel for a transcontinental flight. Also, the early morning flights have few passengers which means an easier to control situation. I think less than 100 were on each plane.

873 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:25 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
raising questions of a 'planejacking' perhaps some one smuggled themself on board.

An airport ground crew named Mohammed has been my working theory all along.

874 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:31 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Have they said why they are being evacuated?

Expert on MSNBC is saying that it is "improbable" that it would be hard for this plane to "climb"...they're not buying this "accident" story, either.

875 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:51 AM PDT by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
MSNBC going to coverage all afternoon, raising questions of a 'planejacking' perhaps

Speaking of coverage isn't "Weekend at Osama's Part II" due to air now?

876 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:51 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
MSNBC going to coverage all afternoon, raising questions of a 'planejacking' perhaps

That would be my hunch, just by the point of impact on the building, top dead and center on the structure.

877 posted on 04/18/2002 11:32:58 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: Sender
heart attack also a possibility. 75 year old under much stress.
878 posted on 04/18/2002 11:33:06 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies]

To: Snake65
Ja! ... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.

Bwaa hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah....ack....thump.

879 posted on 04/18/2002 11:33:13 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: bright_paper_werewolves
Why would a terrorist try to make a terrorist act look like an accident? No one would know he accomplished his goal. No one would call him 'martyr.' Wouldn't that kind of defeat the purpose of terrorism?

My thoughts: The guy's plane caught fire, he wanted to make an emergency landing, the landing gear stuck, smoke filled the cockpit and he crashed into the building. Another possible scenario, based on the facts, is that a terrorist somehow remote-controlled the plane into the building, but that doesn't seem very plausible.

880 posted on 04/18/2002 11:33:21 AM PDT by LibertyGirl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,201-1,208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson