Posted on 04/18/2002 9:06:38 AM PDT by Bommer
Just reported that a small engine plane crashed into a Skyscraper in Milan Italy
IF it WAS a planned crash and the 'official story' is saying it's an accident, then there should be quite a few po'ed diaperheads, who are fuming at losing their 'due credit'.
Are there any reports yet of plane parts coming out the other side and landing? And aren't there any alarm systems that would alert a pilot that there's a building/mountain/trees, etc directly in front of the plane?
You know what .. after 9/11 ANYTHING is possible .. but I will say .. I also don't rely to much on the news stations to report the actual truth either
Eyewitnesses don't count, even credible ones, as we learned from the AA Dominican plane that crashed last Fall.
The media reports seem to be following the damage-control script here, but this is going to be pretty tough to explain away.
Does it really matter? If it's not a fighter, it's a target...
Why did those airline pilots crash their 747 into the WTC? I just cant imagine why they'd do such a thing. OH yah because their throats were cut by terrorist hijackers! Does it occur to you people that a 70 year old guy makes an easy target? Does it occur to you that distractions like engine trouble make good excuses for a plane flying where it is not supposed to be? Does it occur to you that hitting that building as it was hit is like the chances of being struck by lightning 10 times in a row?
What's this .. where did you hear this ..
A wise precaution, even if this is really an accident. Same with the closing of the Milan airport. Better safe than sorry.
My guess is that they wanted an early morning flight because people are not that alert. Also, the planes needed to be 767 or 757 fully loaded with fuel for a transcontinental flight. Also, the early morning flights have few passengers which means an easier to control situation. I think less than 100 were on each plane.
An airport ground crew named Mohammed has been my working theory all along.
Expert on MSNBC is saying that it is "improbable" that it would be hard for this plane to "climb"...they're not buying this "accident" story, either.
Speaking of coverage isn't "Weekend at Osama's Part II" due to air now?
That would be my hunch, just by the point of impact on the building, top dead and center on the structure.
Bwaa hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah....ack....thump.
My thoughts: The guy's plane caught fire, he wanted to make an emergency landing, the landing gear stuck, smoke filled the cockpit and he crashed into the building. Another possible scenario, based on the facts, is that a terrorist somehow remote-controlled the plane into the building, but that doesn't seem very plausible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.