Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A taxing question: Just what is fair?
The Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | April 15 2002 | Edwin A. Locke

Posted on 04/15/2002 4:34:52 AM PDT by Fintan

It's tax day. So let's consider some basic facts. The wealthiest 1 percent of the taxpayers pay 34 percent of all federal income taxes. The top 50 percent pay 96 percent of the total bill. This means that the least wealthy 50 percent pay almost nothing. In short, the income tax system soaks the rich. In the name of justice, the President, Congress and the American public should be demanding a tax cut that lowers the tax bill of the wealthy.

But the opponents of tax cuts do not want justice. They want redistribution of wealth. They want to confiscate the income earned by the wealthy and give it to people who have not earned it. They want the rich - which includes the most productive people in society - to be the servants of the poor.

The moral principle used to justify income redistribution is altruism. Altruism does not mean generosity or benevolent concern for the less fortunate. Altruism means: other-ism. It is the doctrine that it is your moral duty to live for others and to sacrifice your life, property and well-being for theirs. It is the code of self-sacrifice. Under altruism, the productive are the ones who must give and the nonproductive are those who receive. The inability or unwillingness of the nonproductive to create wealth gives them a moral claim upon those who do.

The tax code enforces altruism through coercion. Earning money through voluntary trade is replaced by getting money by force in order to achieve the altruistic goal the government desires. But when the property of some people is seized and given to others, it is an injustice.

The doctrine of altruism induces (and is meant to induce) guilt. It makes the successful feel that they have no right to their achievements. The goal of altruism is to disarm the producers morally so that they will not defend their right to their lives and property. Thus the rich often support higher taxes for themselves. Remember in recent years, just as one example, billionaires Bill Gates and Warren Buffett attacking a repeal of the estate tax.

Most Americans would be shocked to learn that altruism is the moral code that underlies Marxism (and thus communism). Marx's credo was: "From each according to his ability; to each according to his need." Humans have no right to exist for themselves in this view; they are servants of the state, to be disposed of as the state sees fit.

No, we have not gone all the way down that road yet, though the progressive income tax has been a step in that direction.

Altruism is the opposite of Americanism. Americanism means you have the inalienable right "to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," which includes property rights. It means that your life and property belong to you, not to the state or to society. It means that the government's proper job is to protect, not to violate, rights. Acting in one's own self-interest (while respecting the rights of others) is fully moral - it is the fundamental requirement of a successful and happy life. It means that you are not an object of sacrifice but a sovereign being. It means that your property belongs to you. It means that every individual, whether rich or poor, has the same rights. Self-reliance, not self-sacrifice, is the American ideal.

On tax day, support tax cuts by promoting the idea of a truly just society: where each man keeps what he earns and has no claim upon the life and property of others.


Edwin A. Locke, Dean's professor emeritus of leadership and motivation at the University of Maryland at College Park, is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute (http://www.aynrand.org).

 



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: redistribution; taxfairness; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: Mr. Bird
Who are those who benefit most?

maybe we can figure it out by hypothesizing who would lose the most if the society wasn't there. I don't think it breaks down into rich poor that easily. For example, a derivative trader making $5 million would lose alot more than a brain surgeon making $5 million. The former's activity is unproductive; the latter's is not. Therefore tax so that the derivative trader's business suffers more than the heart surgeon.

81 posted on 04/15/2002 9:53:10 AM PDT by Deuce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Deuce
Therefore tax so that the derivative trader's business suffers more than the heart surgeon.

The great and powerful OZ has spoken.

Are you a communist?

82 posted on 04/15/2002 10:29:22 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Deuce
One question. How much of what I own belongs to you?
83 posted on 04/15/2002 10:31:02 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Lincoln was a RINO. I won't defend Lincoln, because he is not generally considered a conservative. A conservative is not only a strict constructionist regarding the constitution, but also a defender of local government over central government, and a defender of free enterprise and federalism. Lincoln was none of this. BTW, correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that Woodrow Wilson was the administration that pushed the 16th amendment.
84 posted on 04/15/2002 10:46:46 AM PDT by Tralfaze McWatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Tralfaze McWatt
Lincoln was a RINO.

It's kind of strange that people today get to say what a Republican is. The people of Lincoln's time were the first Republicans, you would think they would get to define it. Maybe the people of today's party are the RINOs?

I won't defend Lincoln, because he is not generally considered a conservative.

That is why we weren't talking about conservatives. We were talking about Republicans.

A conservative is not only a strict constructionist regarding the constitution, but also a defender of local government over central government, and a defender of free enterprise and federalism.

You must feel lonely in that party since you seem to be one of the very few who thinks this is what a Republican is. Certainly very few elected Republicans.

BTW, correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that Woodrow Wilson was the administration that pushed the 16th amendment.

You were correct, and so was I.

85 posted on 04/15/2002 11:16:46 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Coalitions are a necessary evil of national politics. Until the influence of the mass media is neutralized, there can be no other way to affect national change other than to form coalitions with a major political party that is at least sympathetic to conservative goals and virtues, such as the Republican party. This strategy is especially true for at-large elections such as U.S. senator and U.S president. However, on a more local scale, such as federal house representation, it is better to support conservative candidates regardless of political affiliation.
86 posted on 04/15/2002 11:33:54 AM PDT by Tralfaze McWatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: xzins
A [retail only] sales tax is the only fair tax.

Give the man a cigar!

87 posted on 04/15/2002 12:36:55 PM PDT by Condorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Condorman
You know, it's pretty sad when Russia is ahead of the curve on this issue.
88 posted on 04/15/2002 12:43:02 PM PDT by Condorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
You're right. I've got a problem with people who value plastic surgery so highly and farming and elementary education so little. Don't you?
89 posted on 04/15/2002 12:49:03 PM PDT by ReadMyMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
How much of what I own belongs to you?

None of it. I suggest you re-read the post that gave you the idea that I felt otherwise.

BTW, the inconsistent position you expressed above is nonsensical. (i.e., you don't try to hide any income from the government even though you believe income taxes are theft.)

Are you one of those people whose ideas are so bankrupt that you allege/imply that others are communists to avoid intellectual discourse?

90 posted on 04/15/2002 12:58:01 PM PDT by Deuce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ReadMyMind
You're right. I've got a problem with people who value plastic surgery so highly and farming and elementary education so little. Don't you?

Problem? Nah, as long as they don't violate my rights they are no problem to me. I disagree with them, but I would advocate nothing except friendly persuasion to have them see things my way.

91 posted on 04/15/2002 1:02:17 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
I disagree with them, but I would advocate nothing except friendly persuasion to have them see things my way.

You can't be serious!! A difference of opinion is full justification for a complete Congressional audit and a slew of new laws...

Sheesh! And you call yourself an American?! Phooey! ;^)

92 posted on 04/15/2002 1:06:05 PM PDT by Condorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Deuce
BTW, the inconsistent position you expressed above is nonsensical. (i.e., you don't try to hide any income from the government even though you believe income taxes are theft.)

Only to someone who didn't understand the explanation that was given to them. I explained it so anyone could understand it, perhaps if you reread it a few dozen times. Want the post number?

Are you one of those people whose ideas are so bankrupt that you allege/imply that others are communists to avoid intellectual discourse?

You ask questions like this all the time. The old have you stopped beating your wife question. that is why I asked you a perfectly normal question concerning your belief in communist ideals. If you are capable of intellectual discourse I will be happy to engage you as long as you do so in good faith.

Have you stopped fudging on your deductions yet? You did claim the income from that football pool on your slave form didn't you?

93 posted on 04/15/2002 1:08:41 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Condorman
LOL,,around here that isn't as big of a joke as you make it seem. Many of these so called patriots around here put the people over at DU to shame when it comes to defending governors programs. (and cheering for our "leaders" when they propose a new one as long as they are Republicans doing the proposing)
94 posted on 04/15/2002 1:11:36 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
"How convienient that you have left out the Republicans in promoting the scam. It's laughable."

"But, but, but...what about our $300 rebate? LOL."

When have the Dimocrats ever given us a Tax rebate? LOL.

95 posted on 04/15/2002 1:39:38 PM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
When have the Dimocrats ever given us a Tax rebate? LOL.

I agree that the GOP is better than the Dems (how much better is the question, perhaps). But you must admit they don't exactly work to "roll back government largesse" when given the chance.

96 posted on 04/15/2002 1:46:47 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar
"Today, the vast majority of self-employed folks are tax cheats, never reporting all of their income, and living off salaried folks like leeches."

The national retail sales tax fixes this quite nicely. If you spend money, you pay tax. Everyone pays the same percentage--totally fair.

97 posted on 04/15/2002 1:49:59 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Seeing as how the poor don't pay any income tax already, anything paid would constitute a major shift, I suppose.

Government spending is on the rise. If you want to give tax cuts or even eliminate them on one group the other group(s), maybe your group, will have to make up the difference...It ain't rocket science.

Of course, this would require a simultaneous and massive spending cut.

BINGO!

98 posted on 04/15/2002 5:04:35 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero
Wealthy who are not adding to the economy? Rubbish. Name one.

What about two people whose initials are WJC and HRC?

99 posted on 04/15/2002 5:36:32 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Your nonsensical post #69 is reproduced below.

Joe Gar asked: Do you deny taking payments "off the books" or charging personal items as business expenses?

Yor responsed: yes I deny it.

Then you add: if someone is coming to steal your money, and you hide it in the back yard, is that a problem? Or are people supposed to make sure all their property available to the thieves?

This says, quite directly and nonsensically, that you do not try to hide income from the IRS even though you believe that one should do so because taxes are theft.

You explain this contradiction in a subsequent post by saying that you are afraid to hide your income. Therefore, we can further characterize your pov as gutless and pusillanimous.

Now, tell me, specifically, what I have said that you are unable to distinguish from Communism.

100 posted on 04/15/2002 8:37:50 PM PDT by Deuce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson