To: aristeides
Gee maybe they are paying the price for the church ordaining homos.
2 posted on
04/12/2002 1:42:45 PM PDT by
weikel
To: weikel
gee -- ya think?
To: weikel
If you are saying the Church should not ordain celibate homosexuals, I entirely disagree. The trouble is that, in our sex-obsessed age, very few homosexuals remain celibate any longer.
To: weikel
There have always been homosexual priests, of course, many of them very good men.Gives an entirely different meaning to the term, "Fruits of the Spirit" now doesn't it?
To: weikel
There shouldn't be such a thing as a "homosexual priest" or even a "heterosexual priest"... priests are SUPPOSED to be asexual.
32 posted on
04/12/2002 2:12:42 PM PDT by
ambrose
To: weikel
Gee maybe they are paying the price for the church ordaining homos. Or maybe they're paying the price for keeping women out of the hierarchy. After all, men who are exclusively around other men all the time (prison, pirate ships, biker gangs, prolly navy ships) will pretty much end up doing the same kind of stuff with each other regardless of how straight they are.
99 posted on
04/15/2002 11:23:37 AM PDT by
in_troth
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson