Sigh. The Brady bunch on a whinge and a prayer yet again.
To: All
2 posted on
04/11/2002 6:21:07 PM PDT by
Bob J
To: bang_list
bang.
To: RogueIsland
It would be wonderful if the courts finally ruled that "shall not be infringed" really means shall not be infringed.
WFTR
Bill
4 posted on
04/11/2002 6:24:02 PM PDT by
WFTR
To: RogueIsland
It will be interesting to see what the Ohio Supreme Court has to say, if the Bradyites follow through and take their appeal there, since most 2nd amendment cases have been strategically dropped before getting that far.
A pro-constitutional decision by the state supreme court would be an even bigger setback for anti-Americans than this decision, since other state supreme courts and the U.S. Supreme Court would undoubtedly take notice and would likely agree with the decision if there's a strong majority.
I'll be watching this.
Imal
5 posted on
04/11/2002 6:30:37 PM PDT by
Imal
To: RogueIsland
bitta bing
6 posted on
04/11/2002 6:31:42 PM PDT by
Osinski
To: RogueIsland
This will allow law abiding citizens to carry concealed handguns. Criminals already do.
7 posted on
04/11/2002 6:35:21 PM PDT by
umgud
To: RogueIsland
With the ongoing assistance of the Brady Center's Legal Action Project, the office of the City Solicitor of Cincinnati will appeal the decision to the Ohio Supreme Court and seek to continue a stay of the original order. We are hopeful and confident that the Ohio Supreme Court will undo this judicial aberration, and will expeditiously reverse this decision."
The Brady Center's Legal Action Project, which works to defend and uphold reasonable federal, state and local gun laws and regulations, is serving as co-counsel for the City of Cincinnati with the City Solicitor.
The wing nut Brady idiots dont have a prayer in the Ohio Supreme Court, this is a rock solid decision
Go Brady Go . Once you loose in the OSC, Concealed Carry will be legal in the whole state. And we can fight tooth and nail to kill any and all attempts to reinstate gun control in the Great State of Ohio.
Full text of the Courts decision Here
http://www.hamilton-co.org/appealscourt/Decisions/c-020012.doc
9 posted on
04/11/2002 7:12:06 PM PDT by
Pontiac
To: RogueIsland
...at risk of freedom.
To: RogueIsland
Just because 44 states have already prove the anti-gunners wrong doesn't stop them from spreading the same old lies.
To: RogueIsland
Law enforcement organizations are generally opposed to the widespread carrying of concealed weapons. This ruling threatens to strip Ohio law enforcement of a critical enforcement tool.What tool? Prohibiting constitutionally guaranteed right is a law enforcement tool? What is happening to the law enforcement of this country when it considers preventing that which is specifically allowed by the CONSTITUTION a law enforcement tool? Have we become what we vanquished, Hitler, Japan, the Soviets?
It is pathetic they would even say that. I fear for the attitude of the cops as being so against the rights owned by the citizens. That is elitism by the government employees and it is frightening they would even take that attitude. Very dangerous.
12 posted on
04/11/2002 7:51:59 PM PDT by
JSteff
To: RogueIsland
I'll be glad when that old bich Sarah dies of lung cancer.
14 posted on
04/11/2002 8:07:48 PM PDT by
cutlass
To: RogueIsland
The text of the Ohio Appeals Court decision is on Find Law .Com in PDF.
READ IT!
It is an excellent and lucid comentary on the arbitrary condition of just about every restrictive CCW statute in other states.
It's a good read!
19 posted on
04/11/2002 9:06:06 PM PDT by
elbucko
To: RogueIsland
I have a concealed weapon permit in Colorado. Thousands of us do. There has not been a single instance of a permit holder using his or her weapon to commit a crime. Maybe the Brady bunch should worry a bit more about containing criminals instead of persecuting law abiding citizens.
To: RogueIsland
Today, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence sharply criticized the decision by Ohio's First District Court of Appeals in Klein v. Leis... ...The Appeals Court upheld a lower court ruling that forbids the enforcement in Cincinnati of Ohio's longstanding law generally banning the carrying of concealed weapons.
Today, the Brady Center sharply criticized Ohio's First District Court of Appeals for doing their job.
Today, the Brady Center sharply criticized Ohio's First District Court of Appeals for correctly reading the law.
Today, the Brady Center sharply criticized Ohio's First District Court of Appeals for making a decision based on FACT.
To: RogueIsland
"Court Decision Puts Ohio at Risk" Correction: "Court Decision Puts Our Socialist Agenda At Risk."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson