Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frank Zito says he shot police because they broke his door{ unreasonable search and seizure }
The Star Democrat ^ | April 04, 2002 | By: BRIAN HAAS

Posted on 04/05/2002 8:59:46 PM PST by freespeech1

Frank Zito says he shot police because they broke his door

* Outburst comes during evidence suppression hearing; ruling due today

By: BRIAN HAAS, Staff Writer April 04, 2002

FRANK ZITO ... faces death penalty

SALISBURY - "If they didn't break into my door, I wouldn't have shot them," Frank Zito blurted out Wednesday at a hearing to suppress evidence in Zito's murder trial.

Attorneys for both sides argued in Wicomico County Circuit Court whether several pieces of evidence, including several alleged admissions by Zito, should be allowed in the jury trial. Circuit Judge Donald C. Davis said he should issue a ruling on the motion to suppress evidence sometime today.

Zito, 41, of Centreville, faces the death penalty on two first-degree murder charges and several other felony and misdemeanor charges.

Police allege that he shot and killed Centreville Patrolman Michael S. Nickerson and Dfc. Jason Schwenz, of the Queen Anne's County Sheriff's Office. The two officers went to investigate a noise complaint in February of 2001 when police say Zito shot both officers with a shotgun.

Zito has pleaded not guilty and not criminally responsible to the charges against him.

Judge Davis heard testimony from several police officers and Wicomico County Detention Center employees as to what happened Feb. 13 and Feb. 14, 2001.

Maryland State Police Trooper Corey Skidmore was the first officer to testify and the only witness to the shooting. Skidmore said he arrived to back up Nickerson and Schwenz who were trying to get Zito to come out of his house.

After being threatened, the officers got a key to Zito's trailer from his mother, Betty Zito, who was also Zito's landlady, Skidmore said. He said Zito's mother told the officers to get Zito out "by any means necessary."

After the three officers broke through a storm door and entered Zito's screen porch, Schwenz opened the front door with the key, Skidmore said.

As the door opened, Schwenz was hit with the first shotgun blast, followed by Nickerson, who was thrown backward, Skidmore said.

Skidmore said Zito had not seen him on the porch, so he waited for Zito to come out, sprayed his eyes with pepper spray and arrested Zito.

Maryland State Police Tfc. Brian Fisher was the officer who officially arrested Zito after the shooting, Fisher said. He testified that he took Zito away from the shooting scene and back near his patrol car.

Fisher said Zito was yelling "Nazi Gestapo" at the officers and complained that someone broke into his home. Fisher said Zito also told him he had put a shotgun under his couch.

At that point, Fisher said, he arrested Zito and read him his Miranda Rights. Though one of the Miranda Rights is the right to keep silent, Fisher said Zito kept talking.

"'I thought I was protecting my home,' " Fisher quoted Zito as saying. " 'I didn't know they were police until I got outside.' "

Robert E. Williams, an investigator for the Queen Anne's County State's Attorney Office, formally interviewed Zito for about an hour that night, Williams testified. Again Zito was told he could remain silent. But Zito "just started talking," Williams said.

Williams said Zito complained that police were trying to "beat (him) up" and threaten his mother. Then, Williams said, Zito described the events leading up to the shooting.

"'When they went to the second door, I got the 12-gauge and took the safety off,'" Williams said Zito explained. Then, as the door opened, "'I just shot.'"

"'I know I snagged that bastard,'" said Zito, according to Williams.

Williams said Zito talked with very little questioning by him or two other officers present at the interrogation.

Several other officers testified that Zito admitted shooting the two officers with no questioning. Two officers at the Wicomico County Detention Center also testified that they overheard Zito admit to the shooting while talking on the jail's telephone.

Defense lawyers later called Betty Zito to the stand. Wheeled into the courtroom in a wheelchair, Mrs. Zito was too weak to hold up her right hand to be sworn in. She lifted her right hand with her left hand as high as she could while being sworn in.

She testified that her son has his own trailer, which he rented from her. She said his rent is no different from the rent for the eight other trailers on her property.

She said Frank "wasn't so good" on Feb. 13, a condition made worse by the police breaking his storm door. She said police threatened to "tear gas" Zito's home unless he came outside.

She sobbed lightly as she described her frustration that day, trying to get someone on the telephone to help her and her son.

She said the only reason she gave the officers the key to Zito's trailer was so they wouldn't break his door and "tear gas" him.

Then she said she went around the side of Zito's trailer to peer inside and find him. That's when Mrs. Zito heard the "pop, pop" of the shotgun blasts, she said.

As defense lawyer Patricia Chappell wheeled Zito's mother past him and out of the courtroom, he gently put his hand on his mother's knee.

"Goodbye," she said as she passed from the courtroom.

In their closing arguments, defense lawyer Brian Shefferman argued that Zito's Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure was violated by the three officers. He said Zito did not consent to the officers coming on his premises even though they entered his enclosed porch.

Shefferman argued that all evidence that came about because of the "illegal" entry to Zito's trailer should be suppressed during the jury trial. Most of the testimony that would be lost if this motion were to be granted would be Trooper Skidmore's description of the shooting and the events leading up to it.

Shefferman also argued that statements that Zito made to officers throughout the night should be suppressed because Zito was injured when he made them. Officers testified earlier that Zito was bleeding from a cut on his face that night. >{?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; unreasonablesearch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-392 next last
To: Roscoe
I suppose your post had a point. However, I think I'd need an electron scanning microscope to see it. What is the point of your post?

-The Hajman-
221 posted on 04/07/2002 9:15:12 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
What I find somewhat amazing is that all these cops claim the defendant just kept talking after being read his rights, but not a one of them bothered to get it recorded. Something here stinks. This is especially so if the guy allegedly called the the cops Nazis. The last thing a person who had that opinion would do is to 'keep talking'.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant will walk; if not aquitted by a jury, he will win on appeal. I fail to understand why cops beat down doors to arrest someone or to serve papers when they could simply wait until the guy goes out in public and arrest or serve them then. Most of these 'mistakes' could easily be avoided since the level of danger would be much reduced.

222 posted on 04/07/2002 9:38:10 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
Memorial Fund:
Nickerson/Schwenz Memorial Fund C/O Centreville National Bank, Commerce Street, Centreville MD 21617

Officer MICHAEL NICKERSON (26) - killed in the line of duty
Deputy JASON SCHWENZ (28) - killed in the line of duty

What is the point of your post?

Didn't fit your cop-hater agenda? Too bad.

223 posted on 04/07/2002 9:47:50 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
Could another angle for the defense be that Zito knew what the law was regarding unlawful entry and reasonably assumed that the cops, if they were legitimate, would have known that breaking in was illegal? If so, I think the defense position would be enhanced. After all, every cop should know that a forced entry under these circumstances was illegal, and the cops would never break the law, would they?

All in all, this is a very sad situation and our prayers need to be with all those involved. Maybe this should be a lesson to law enforcement personnel and agencies to re-examine the arrogance and utter disregard for the constitutional rights of citizens. This seems to be a cultural thing with too make LEAs and prosecutors. The poor street cop is led to believe that these actions are lawful when the opposite is true.

Another point, just because someone claims to be a cop does not mean they are a cop.

224 posted on 04/07/2002 9:54:03 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Didn't fit your cop-hater agenda? Too bad.

I like cops. I've got a good friend who's a police chief. I respect policemen. However, I don't respect people who do things illegally. And this is beside the point. What was your point? You never did provide it.

-The Hajman-
225 posted on 04/07/2002 10:07:04 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
Memorial Fund:
Nickerson/Schwenz Memorial Fund C/O Centreville National Bank, Commerce Street, Centreville MD 21617

Officer MICHAEL NICKERSON (26) - killed in the line of duty
Deputy JASON SCHWENZ (28) - killed in the line of duty

Perhaps you could donate to Zito.

226 posted on 04/07/2002 10:19:37 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Perhaps you could donate to Zito.

Perhaps the world is flat. Perhaps I'm not broke. Perhaps there's a reason to donate to Zito. Perhaps you actually tell me the point of your post (I won't hold my breath). Perhaps you're capable of actually make a valid, logical, non-emotional point.

What's your point? Do you even have one, except to have straw-man ammo to try to toss ad hominem arguments around?

-The Hajman-
227 posted on 04/07/2002 10:29:45 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Begging the question. Zito wasn't attacked and he knew they were police officers, having refused their requests to come out.

He had no legal duty to 'come out'.

228 posted on 04/07/2002 10:31:49 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
GOVERNOR PARRIS N. GLENDENING'S REMARKS

FUNERAL OF PATROLMAN MICHAEL NICKERSON

CHESTERTOWN, MD

FRIDAY, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2001

AS DRAFTED

Good morning. I am honored that Officer Michael Nickerson's family asked me to speak briefly today.

Another hero has fallen. Two days after his fellow police officer, Sheriff's Deputy Jason Schwenz, was laid to rest, we are here to say farewell to Patrolman Michael S. Nickerson.

To the family of Patrolman Nickerson: his mother Sue, his father Joe, his brothers Albert and Philip, please know you have Kathleen and my deepest sympathies. We cannot begin to know the grief you feel today. I only hope our presence here can be a comfort to you. Please know that we are grateful to Michael for his service as a police officer. . . . service for which he made the ultimate sacrifice. Today, as citizens, we stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the police officers gathered here, who protect us daily... nightly... always. We stand side-by-side to pay tribute and respect to a man. . . a man who dedicated his life to one of the most difficult jobs imaginable. It is right that we grieve together, yet it seems so small in comparison to what Patrolman Nickerson gave up for us.

Patrolman Nickerson was only 24-years-old when he gave his life in service to the citizens of our State. We can only imagine the great things which awaited him had he not been taken from us. He was so young, just beginning to rise to his full potential. He had little doubt in his heart about the man he wanted to be. He wanted to serve. His family knew it. His police chief knew it. We now know it. In just three weeks on the job as a Centreville police officer, the citizens of this town and county came to know it as well.

I am thankful there are men and women who care enough to accept the challenges of being a police officer. There are many who could not take up this great cause. We call upon these dedicated individuals to deal with the worst our society has to offer. We call upon them to be part of the law enforcement family on and off the clock. We call upon them to give more than any of us has a right to ask - their very lives.

Euripides said, "When good men die, their goodness does not perish." I believe this can be taken one step further with Officer Nickerson. His cause, his goals, his reason for being a police officer live on.

Patrolman Nickerson is not just a hero because he died in the line of duty. He is a hero because he chose to accept the challenge of being a police officer. He is a hero because he was willing to serve the citizens of Centreville with everything he had, even when it meant giving all he had.

Our hearts are filled with sorrow today, but they are equally filled with gratitude to this fallen officer. We are grateful for his life, for his example, for his service, and for his sacrifice. We can never repay Patrolman Nickerson for what he gave. We can only promise to never forget.

The Bible, Matthew, Chapter 5, verse 9 reads: "Blessed are the peace makers because they shall be called the children of God." As Governor, on behalf of the 5 million citizens of our State, I thank all the peace makers for the job you do every day. And I thank the Nickerson family for including me today. Bless all of you.

Thank you.



229 posted on 04/07/2002 10:41:59 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Zito knew they were police officers when he committed the murders.
230 posted on 04/07/2002 10:43:44 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Nice speach. I always appriciate those kinds of speaches for police officers. They deserve it.

Now, how about we skip the emotion, and get to the reality of the problem: Those two policemen did something illegal, and an action against them was consistent with their behavior. I don't fall for emotional arguments (though I did enjoy the speach. Thank you for posting it). Emotional arguments are for liberals that can't reason, not for people who actually look at facts and come up with logical conclusions. I'm glad they gave the speach to honor the policemen. However, that doesn't mean I'm going to agree with them breaking and entering the man's house. They did something illegal, they paid the consequences, and them being cops don't make it right. Sorry Roscoe, but the badge doesn't give them free reign to do whatever they want. If they act in a criminal manner, don't be supprised if they're treated as such.

-The Hajman-
231 posted on 04/07/2002 10:50:02 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
That is a question of fact, and questions of fact are for the jury to decide.
232 posted on 04/07/2002 10:56:21 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
Now, how about we skip the emotion, and get to the reality of the problem: Those two policemen did something illegal...

The "problem" was entering his porch in response to a public disturbance complaint, not the shotgun murder of two men? What an interesting perspective.

Close your eyes, wouldn't want you to get upset.

Memorial Fund:
Nickerson/Schwenz Memorial Fund C/O Centreville National Bank, Commerce Street, Centreville MD 21617

Officer MICHAEL NICKERSON (26) - killed in the line of duty
Deputy JASON SCHWENZ (28) - killed in the line of duty


233 posted on 04/07/2002 11:01:15 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
The "problem" was entering his porch in response to a public disturbance complaint, not the shotgun murder of two men? What an interesting perspective.

No, the problem was breaking down his door and forcing their way into his home without permission or a warrent. That's illegal, any way you parse it. BTW, if what they did was illegal, then the shooting may not be a murder. Your problem is, is defining it a murder before applying the evidence. In other words, you're going about it backwards. You're suppose to look at the evidence, then deside if it's a murder or not. In other words, you can't claim it's a murder until all evidence has been looked at, and it's been desided the evidence leads to a murder. You're applying the term against the definition. This is circular reasoning, which is a logical fallacy. Everytime you apply murder to the original arguments (which are supposed to define if it's a murder or not), you run into this fallacy and your argument falls apart as invalid.

-The Hajman-
234 posted on 04/07/2002 11:07:21 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
No, the problem was breaking down his door and forcing their way into his home without permission or a warrent.

Actually, the porch of the trailer he was renting from his mother, in response to a public disturbance complaint. Either way, the lamest justification for murder imaginable.

That the life of two policemen is worth less than the door of a trailer porch in the eyes of Zito's apologists says a lot about their priorities.

Objecting to information about the victim's fund does too.

Again, shield your eyes.

Memorial Fund:
Nickerson/Schwenz Memorial Fund C/O Centreville National Bank, Commerce Street, Centreville MD 21617

Officer MICHAEL NICKERSON (26) - killed in the line of duty
Deputy JASON SCHWENZ (28) - killed in the line of duty

235 posted on 04/07/2002 11:21:07 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: freespeech1

"America is at that awkward stage.
It's too late to work within the system,
but too early to shoot the bastards."

- Che Guevara

236 posted on 04/07/2002 11:27:37 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Actually, the porch of the trailer he was renting from his mother, in response to a public disturbance complaint. Either way, the lamest justification for murder imaginable.

A public disturbance complaint isn't justification for an illegal break and entry. You're using murder again before it's been determined (and I noticed you ignored my argument completely, again). Your argument just crashed and burned.

That the life of two policemen is worth less than the door of a trailer porch in the eyes of Zito's apologists says a lot about their priorities.

So, you don't believe in self-defense? You don't believe one has the right to defend their own home against criminal actions and criminal people? Well, I do. BTW, if I was a Zito apologetic, I would say he should go free no matter what. I don't claim that. So you're wrong..again.

Objecting to information about the victim's fund does too.

Did I say I ever objected to it? Nope. Wrong again (at least your consistent). You're using it as an emotional argument, and that's what I object to (which every rational person should). Your argument crashed and burned again.

Can you actually give an argument which isn't based on emotion? I'm still not holding my breath..

-The Hajman-
237 posted on 04/07/2002 11:28:12 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
Sadly for some here on FR, cops can do no wrong, even when they violate people's civil rights.
238 posted on 04/07/2002 11:28:49 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: wcbtinman
I think the solution is to just erase the 4th AMendment from the Constitution. It's pretty much dead anyway, along with the 10th Amendment. Once those are gone, the 2nd and 1st, in that order are next.
239 posted on 04/07/2002 11:31:08 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Hajman

You haven't shown how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, or how he acted in self-defense. His defense attorney is going to have the same tough problem selling the militia nutcase spin to 12 rational jurors.

240 posted on 04/07/2002 11:34:33 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson