[Roscoe]

No, the problem was breaking down his door and forcing their way into his home without permission or a warrent.

Actually, the porch of the trailer he was renting from his mother, in response to a public disturbance complaint. Either way, the lamest justification for murder imaginable.

That the life of two policemen is worth less than the door of a trailer porch in the eyes of Zito's apologists says a lot about their priorities.

Objecting to information about the victim's fund does too.

Again, shield your eyes.

Memorial Fund:
Nickerson/Schwenz Memorial Fund C/O Centreville National Bank, Commerce Street, Centreville MD 21617

Officer MICHAEL NICKERSON (26) - killed in the line of duty
Deputy JASON SCHWENZ (28) - killed in the line of duty

[Hajman]

Actually, the porch of the trailer he was renting from his mother, in response to a public disturbance complaint. Either way, the lamest justification for murder imaginable.

A public disturbance complaint isn't justification for an illegal break and entry. You're using murder again before it's been determined (and I noticed you ignored my argument completely, again). Your argument just crashed and burned.

That the life of two policemen is worth less than the door of a trailer porch in the eyes of Zito's apologists says a lot about their priorities.

So, you don't believe in self-defense? You don't believe one has the right to defend their own home against criminal actions and criminal people? Well, I do. BTW, if I was a Zito apologetic, I would say he should go free no matter what. I don't claim that. So you're wrong..again.

Objecting to information about the victim's fund does too.

Did I say I ever objected to it? Nope. Wrong again (at least your consistent). You're using it as an emotional argument, and that's what I object to (which every rational person should). Your argument crashed and burned again.

Can you actually give an argument which isn't based on emotion? I'm still not holding my breath..

-The Hajman-