Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Actually, the porch of the trailer he was renting from his mother, in response to a public disturbance complaint. Either way, the lamest justification for murder imaginable.

A public disturbance complaint isn't justification for an illegal break and entry. You're using murder again before it's been determined (and I noticed you ignored my argument completely, again). Your argument just crashed and burned.

That the life of two policemen is worth less than the door of a trailer porch in the eyes of Zito's apologists says a lot about their priorities.

So, you don't believe in self-defense? You don't believe one has the right to defend their own home against criminal actions and criminal people? Well, I do. BTW, if I was a Zito apologetic, I would say he should go free no matter what. I don't claim that. So you're wrong..again.

Objecting to information about the victim's fund does too.

Did I say I ever objected to it? Nope. Wrong again (at least your consistent). You're using it as an emotional argument, and that's what I object to (which every rational person should). Your argument crashed and burned again.

Can you actually give an argument which isn't based on emotion? I'm still not holding my breath..

-The Hajman-
237 posted on 04/07/2002 11:28:12 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: Hajman

You haven't shown how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, or how he acted in self-defense. His defense attorney is going to have the same tough problem selling the militia nutcase spin to 12 rational jurors.

240 posted on 04/07/2002 11:34:33 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

To: Hajman
[That the life of two policemen is worth less than the door of a trailer porch in the eyes of Zito's apologists says a lot about their priorities.]

So, you don't believe in self-defense?

What a fascinating reply.

The Grand Jury took only moments to find that the correct charge was murder. The nebulous suggestion that the shotgunning of the two police officers was legally justified has no quote, cite or link to any alleged statute, naturally.

243 posted on 04/07/2002 11:51:33 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson