Skip to comments.
NASA's little mission to turn our world upside down (NASA plans to repeal the laws of gravity)
HoustonChronicle.com ^
| March 29, 2002, 11:51PM
| MARGARET WERTHEIM
Posted on 03/31/2002 4:49:05 AM PST by rw4site
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Damn! Ginger ("It") may already be obsolete.
1
posted on
03/31/2002 4:49:05 AM PST
by
rw4site
To: rw4site
The disc is cooled to below -233 degrees centigrade and levitated using a magnetic fieldCOOL!
2
posted on
03/31/2002 4:56:46 AM PST
by
putupon
To: rw4site
If it doesn't work, I hope NASA does take a hit.
3
posted on
03/31/2002 4:59:27 AM PST
by
dr_who
To: rw4site
To: rw4site
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...........I've heard The Art Bell Institute of Technology and Engineering has already been working on this for some time now.
I suppose any knowledgable claim should be checked out but.........I have a BIG problem with researchers who say, "I did it!.......But, I'm not going to tell you how. Its a secret!"
99.9999999998% of such cases are usually false.
To: rw4site
6
posted on
03/31/2002 5:11:38 AM PST
by
medved
To: dr_who
This is disinformation being spewed out for the media.
The U.S. already has 'stealth blimps' for weather control and special forces intel gathering. We already have top secret anti-gravity 'flying triangles' which have been seen all over the U.S. Most recently, flying tringles were seen in the U.K. displaying typical red and blue warning lights ... Why would alien craft display such lights? DUH
7
posted on
03/31/2002 5:13:20 AM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: DoctorMichael
Yeah, I'd believe The Art Bell Institute before I'd trust anything from NASA. </sarcastic humor> (-;
8
posted on
03/31/2002 5:15:53 AM PST
by
rw4site
To: isthisnickcool
Your two "blocks" are not behaving correctly after the collision. One or both of the blocks would have to preserve components of the spinning block's angular momentum. One of them would therefore have to proceed off at angle if the self-spinning component was halted.
Also they proceed away together, which would seem to be different than any other equal mass collision (except inelastic) wherein you usually get a momentum exchange.
9
posted on
03/31/2002 5:16:22 AM PST
by
jlogajan
To: ex-Texan
Obviously, aliens adhere to their own system of traffic laws in outer space, and that includes putting blue and red warning lights on their vehicles.
10
posted on
03/31/2002 5:20:14 AM PST
by
dr_who
To: ex-Texan
Want to elaborate? Which sites do you get info about "flying triangles?" Weather control? Where? I want to know more....
11
posted on
03/31/2002 5:23:02 AM PST
by
rw4site
To: rw4site
I read this a couple of days ago and after thinking about it I don't see what the big deal is. It isn't >really< anti-gravity. All that is happening as far as I can tell, is that the mass of the object >appears< to be reduced. WHether it actually is or not is open to debate but for the sake of an argument lets say it is.
So now we have an object and let's say ti's mass has been reduced by half. It ISN't levitating. It's still sitting right where it was, albeit with apparently half the mass.
Yes it should be easier to move the object, but of course you'd have to also move the machine that is reducing it's mass and so the net reduction may be nil at best.
And I'm not sure something with negative mass, assuming that could be achieved, would levitate. Why should it?
Doubling the power of the mass reduction machine may not lead to a direct redcution in the target's mass. In fact the closer you get to zero mass, the more power it may require. It may well be one of those unreachable limits.
But heck, what do I know? I don't get to play in the abstact universe anymore...sigh.
prisoner6
To: jlogajan
Your two "blocks" are not behaving correctly after the collision
Uh, uh, I just thought they were pretty:)
Actually, I stole those off one of the sites links form this story led to. Interesting stuff. At some point American ingenuity will come up with something.
To: rw4site
Given all the money the governments wastes I (for one) don't really have a problem with nasa spending $600,000 to see if there's anything to this.
14
posted on
03/31/2002 5:29:19 AM PST
by
Valin
To: jlogajan
Wasn't Mr. Peabody working on a similar device in the early 1960's but accedently changed one of the signs(+/-)in his calculations and ended up with the Way Back Machine?
15
posted on
03/31/2002 5:34:21 AM PST
by
Axelsrd
To: rw4site
Damn! Ginger ("It") may already be obsolete. Oh, I don't know. It might take a new form, something resembling Marty McFly's "hoverboard." (smile)
To: Valin
Given all the money the governments wastes I (for one) don't really have a problem with nasa spending $600,000 to see if there's anything to this The Soviets went big time in researching the psychological paranormal. What a waste of state resources. Look what happened to them being led by the intellectually elite commies. They spent their resources and lost the confidence of their citizens. This should be a lesson about the worthlessness of granting public money on pipe dreams. It the science behide it has any merit, let a hard nosed venture capitalist fund it and gigure out a good use for it. Computers didn't become useful until capitalists saw their merit and mass produced them.
To: rw4site
Nothing new. Florida State University has been doing anti-gravity experiments for several years. They have a device that counteracts gravity. Huge magnetic affair, the weightless "chamber" is only large enough to float a small frog. It's been published publically on several occasions.
One Link of sourcesFSU Magnetic Lab
To: rw4site
"Gravity-shielding?" So H.G. Wells' "Cavorite" wasn't so loony after all?
19
posted on
03/31/2002 5:45:31 AM PST
by
backhoe
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson