Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neil Bortz ^ | Neil Boortz

Posted on 03/29/2002 5:26:13 PM PST by VinnyTex


The Democrats have begun their campaign to frighten voters before the fall elections.  It's nothing but a replay of past elections, the only difference being that they seem to be starting the scare tactics a bit early this year.  I guess you can't blame them.  Nothing else has worked.  The tried to hand the Florida election problems on Bush.  No go.  Then it was the economy, and that didn't work either.  They gave a stab at the "Bush is stupid" routine, but Americans aren't buying it.  Enron looked worse for Clinton than it did for Republicans, so the Social Democrats had to give up on that one too.  So, it's time to go back to Democratic roots.  Try to scare the beejezus out of older voters.  It's worked in the past -- so it will surely work this time.

The ploy is simple.  Convince wrinkled citizens that the evil Republicans want to take away their Social Security.   It?s an old trick, tried and true.   The Democrats roll this one out every single election.   This time the point men are Richard Gephardt and Terry McAuliffe.  They're both telling voters that the evil Republicans have a "secret" plan to reduce Social Security benefits as soon as they are reelected. 

So .. now that the Democrats have opened this whole ?secret plan? idea ? what about the secret plans of the Democratic Socialists?   Just what legislative agenda does the Democrat Party plan to pursue if and when they gain control of the Senate, the House and the presidency?   Well, your Talkmaster has been watching these socialists for years, and taking notes.  Here are just some of the goodies the Social Democrat Party has in store for the people of America.  

        Remove a majority of voters from responsibility for income taxes

This is the biggie ? and they?ve made no attempt to hide their goals here.   The Democrats have been working on this plan for decades --- with no small amount of help from the cowardly Republicans.   The idea is simple.  Using ?refundable? tax credits and deductions and such ideas as the fraudulent Earned Income Tax Credit the Democrats are working to shift the entire burden for the payment of federal income taxes onto a minority of US taxpayers.   Right now the top 50 percent of taxpayers pay almost 96 percent of the taxes.  The Democrats are close to their goal.  When the majority of voters have no federal income tax liability it will be almost impossible to pass any meaningful tax cuts ? and further tax increases will be a piece of cake, especially if the taxes only affect those to be considered to be rich.  Through this ploy the Democrats plan to create a defeat-proof Democrat congress. 

       Massive increase in Social Security taxes

As we?ve said, Social Security is a mainstay when it comes to Democrat vote-buying.   Social Security was, is and always will be nothing more than a giant income redistribution scheme designed to create dependency on government and loyalty to the program?s protectors in congress.   The more money you pour into Social Security benefits, the more the wizened class loves you, depends on you and will be dedicated to keeping you in office.  The Democrats need massive new funding sources to pay expanded Social Security benefits --- but they must get that money without raising Social Security taxes on the middle and lower income groups.  The solution?  The Democrats have a ?secret plan? to expand the wage base for Social Security taxes.   Right now you only pay these taxes on the first $88,000 or so of income.  Give the Democrats the power and watch that wage base jump to $100,000, $200,000 and beyond.   The eventual Democrat Party goal is to have people pay Social Security taxes on every penny they earn ? no matter how much that is.    There will no comparable increase in benefits for the high income earners.  The extra money will be used to keep the Democratic middle and low-income constituency happy. 

        End the home mortgage interest deduction

Democrats have been after this income tax deduction for decades.  They call it a "subsidy."  Now the more intelligent among us will clearly understand that allowing someone to keep more of the money that they earn can hardly be called a "subsidy." But we're talking about the more intelligent among us.  These people aren't likely to be voting for Demcorats anyway!

As soon as the Democrats manage to gain control of the federal government they will move to eliminate this "subsidy for the rich."  They know that there will be little adverse political fallout.  After all -- the mortgage interest deduction is only valuable to people who actually pay income taxes AND who itemize their deductions.  Democrats have already succeeded in removing most of their core constituency from the income tax rolls --- so what is there to lose?  

When the Democrats ride into power you had better be prepared to kiss that mortgage interest deduction -- and a lot more of your money -- a fond farewell.

        Socialized Medicine

They already tried this will Hillary Care.   It failed.  Democrats aren?t discouraged by failure.  They just try and try again until they finally get you to swallow the poison pill.  There are two basic reasons the Democrats are working so hard for complete government control of this huge segment of our economy.  One, of course, is power.  Health care comprises about 15% of our national economy.   If the government can seize control of this large a segment of our economy a giant step toward a socialist economy will have been achieved.   The second reason is control.   Think about it.  If you control a person?s access to healthcare ? you effectively control that person.

Right now the Democrats have had to put their plans for socialized medicine on hold.  Those pesky Republicans in the House and the White House are making things tough.   Democrats have to be satisfied with just sitting up there in the Beltway blocking any efforts to introduce competition into the medical marketplace.

Democrats live in quaking fear of free market competition.   This was one of the reasons they worked so hard to defeat Bush?s economic stimulus plan.  There was a provision in that plan that would allow laid-off workers to go out into the marketplace to find health insurance.   They would then be allowed a tax credit to cover the cost of that health insurance premium.  Democrats wanted federal funds to be paid to employers to encourage employers to extend health insurance benefits to laid-off workers.   Democrats knew that if private individuals ventured into the free marketplace to find health insurance they might just find that free market competition could deliver a superior insurance product at a reduced price.

        Tax pension funds

This idea first received serious consideration in the early Clintonista years.   As soon as the Republicans took control of the Congress the idea disappeared.  Right now it?s being ?secretly? incubated by Democrats to be hatched when they regain control.   The idea is simple.   There are trillions of dollars out there in various private pension and 401K plans.  All of these trillions of dollars are earning interest for (gasp!) private investors and individuals and not for the government!   To make matters worse ? most of these private pension and 401K plans are owned by the evil, hated upper income earners.  

The ?secret? plan?  A one-time 15% tax on the outstanding balance of all private pension and 401K retirement plans.  This money would be paid into the general fund of the federal government and used to fund various social programs for low and middle-income earners.  

Is this a dangerous plan for Democrats?  Not really.  The plan would take money chiefly from those who earn enough money to actually pay income taxes and contribute to pension plans.   These people do not make up the core of Democratic voters.

        Tax your pension contributions too

After the Democrats levy their 15% tax on the outstanding balance of all pension and 401K plans, they intend to follow up with a tax on all future contributions to these plans.  The theory is that ?rich? people shouldn?t be allowed to contribute that money to these plans tax free when ?poor? people don?t have that opportunity.  

         Economically Targeted Investments -- controlling your pension fund investments.

Here we are, right back at your pension funds and 401K funds again.  Again  --- there is so much money in these funds, trillions of dollars, that the Democrats just can't leave them alone.  All of this money just sitting there and not one penny of it is being used to buy votes for Democrats.  So --- here comes the idea of Economically Targeted Investments.  "ETIs" the Democrats call them, and they're a huge part of the Democrat "secret" agenda.  All they need is control in Washington.

Here's the deal.  The government grants various tax breaks to these retirement plans.  As you know, or as you should know, tax breaks are usually granted to force some individual or corporation to act and behave in some manner pleasing to government.  The Democrats plan to change the rules on pension and 401K accounts.  Instead of just investing these funds in stocks and bonds, fund managers will be required by the government to invest these funds in certain investments dictated by government -- by Democrats.  In this way the governments can fund some of their spending schemes, but without using government funds.  The Democrats will simply pass laws requiring fund managers to invest in corporations building low income housing; or companies who are hiring workers off welfare roles.  Other "allowed" investments will be in such things as environmental protection, waste recycling and other causes popular with the left. In short order the Democrats will have rules in place which state that these pension funds cannot be invested in companies that are "unfriendly" to unions.  To a Democrat ... any company with a non-union workforce is "unfriendly" to unions.  Corporations who have affirmative action programs will get the not.  Companies who hire and promote on merit will not.  

All of this will mean that the Democrats can claim credit for spending on some of their favorite programs without going to the taxpayers.  They can just, in effect, use pension money.  The end result, of course, is lower returns on pension fund investments -- and lower pension benefits to retirees.  That doesn't bother the Democrats, though.  The less money you have to retire on the more dependent on government you will be.

        Force employers to pay for ?family leave.?

Right now the Family Leave Act requires employers to give employees about 12 weeks of unpaid  ?family leave? to take care of certain family events and emergencies, such as having a baby, illness, death or some other situation.  The key here is that the family leave is unpaid.   The Democrats want employers to continue to pay the employees while they take their extended vacation.  The Democrats ?secret? plan is to begin with a law requiring payment of about one-half of the employee?s salary.   This will give Democratic candidates the opportunity to campaign in future years on the basis of increasing the percentage paid to those on family leave.   Paying people for not working --- a Democrat staple.

        Seizure of property of those who flee Democratic tyranny

As Democrats work diligently for more control over our economy and increase levels of income redistribution many high-achieving Americans are making plans to run.  The greater the confiscation of wealth becomes the more people start looking for other countries in which to base their businesses.  Democrats have a ?secret plan? to impose confiscatory taxes on any Americans who try to move their wealth or their business interests out of this country.

        Government paid childcare for majority of voters

 The absolute last thing a Democrat would ever do would be to suggest to anyone that they shouldn?t have a baby they can?t afford to raise.   Democrats know that children are the absolute more important thing in the lives of millions of Americans.   They have been working for decades to impose ever more expensive rules and regulations on private child care agencies.   They have also been working to raise taxes to the point that it is difficult beyond reason to raise a child on the income of one working parent.  Thus ? the necessity of child care.  If the government steps in and provides the funds for that child care then, to that extent, the parents become just that much more dependent on government ? and Democrats.

        Government control of all childhood education

Democrats are the party of big government.   Democrats are more than thrilled with the increased propensity of many Americans to look to government for the solution to virtually all problems they face in their daily lives.  Democrats know that to teach people that they can expect the government to be there to solve all of their problems you have to start with the children.   Catholic schools can be expected to teach their students that Catholicism is good.  Jewish private schools are going to sing the praises of Judaism.   Christian schools will teach the children that Jesus is really cool.  Government schools?    Government schools will promote what?   Government!  Thus, Democrats see a clear need to keep as many children in government education programs as possible.  The ?secret? plan?  Continue to work against any ideas that would make it easier for parents to remove their children from government schools.  This means working against such ideas as vouchers or tax credits to help parents afford the cost of private schools.  They will also work to add increased regulations to parents who make the decision to home school their children.

        Government imposed limits on executive income

This one is really going to have to wait until Democrats have a solid control of the federal machine.  The Social Democrat party has plans to institute limits on executive compensation.   The idea is to impose confiscatory corporate income taxes on companies who pay their top executives more than X-times the compensation paid to the lowest-paid employees.   

        Repealing the Second Amendment

Haven't you ever thought it a bit odd that leftists and Democrats are generally opposed to the concept of the private ownership of firearms, while conservatives and libertarians favor the idea?  Well, there's a reason.  Those who value and celebrate the worth of the individual and of individual freedom generally believe that the individual should be permitted to own and bear arms.  Those who put the power of government over and above the power of the individual would just as soon see the individual unarmed.  Armed individuals are, of course, a threat to tyranny.

        Destroy talk radio

Democrats aren't fond of talk radio.  They know that Rush Limbaugh played a huge role in the voter revolution of 1994.  Leftist realize that almost all successful talk radio shows are hosted by people who do not share their political views.  They will try to neutralize talk radio through regulation.  Since Democrats love the "fair" word so much, they'll try to reinstitute something called the "Fairness Doctrine."  How would this law work?  Well, for example, a talk show host would not be allowed to voice opposition to a particular Democrat goal without finding some Democrat to go on the air to defend that goal.  Talk radio soared in listenership and popularity following the death of the Fairness Doctrine.  Democrats know that talk radio can once again be pushed into the radio background with new regulations.  Give them the power -- and it's time for me to retire.

        There?s more

The above list is by no means complete.  Keep you eye on this page as we work to expose even more of the ?secret plans? of America?s socialist party, the Democrats.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 03/29/2002 5:26:13 PM PST by VinnyTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
A nifty solution may be found in the final pages of this book:

We can dream...can't we?

2 posted on 03/29/2002 5:32:48 PM PST by follow your bliss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
Great article, bookmarked bttt.
3 posted on 03/29/2002 5:36:48 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
In fact I would say that this is the best article on the dems ive ever seen on FR all conservatives should read it.
4 posted on 03/29/2002 5:39:12 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79; Larrylied; Pissed off Janitor; doug from upland; rebelbase; OWK; dittomom; TLBShow
5 posted on 03/29/2002 5:40:40 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: follow your bliss
Haven't read it whats the basic plot( if your concerned about spoiling if for other freeper you can freepmail me).
6 posted on 03/29/2002 5:48:19 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan From Michigan
Almost forgot you ping.
7 posted on 03/29/2002 5:55:30 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
There's lots of great stuff on Neal's web site . His radio show has gone national now. Us Ga. FRs have enjoyed him for 20+ years.
8 posted on 03/29/2002 5:57:08 PM PST by kcordell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I e-mailed it to my Democrat voting parents and said -- everytime you vote for Democrats this is what you are voting for. The Demonrat Plan will ruin any hopes and dreams I would aspire to. Punish the inventive, punish the hard workers and award the lazy.
9 posted on 03/29/2002 6:02:12 PM PST by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Thanks for the ping. Charlie Rangel has introduced a bill several times which would mandate all private pensions invest a certain percentage of assets in government sponsored "investments" such as public housing.

I would add one more item to Neil's list: Government union take over of key industries. They are well on their way to that now. Calpers already pushes Wall Street around. There are hundreds of billions invested in the markets by government workers. We could soon all be working for the clerk at the DMV or our kid's teacher.

10 posted on 03/29/2002 6:05:07 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
Not to mention the not so secret vote of the Democrats to take away FRee Speech from the people 60 days before an election. Will these democrats ever stop? Nope, for them it is election season everyday of the year.

But hey 2 can play the rat game. LOL at the democrats, a species all their own.

11 posted on 03/29/2002 6:06:11 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Hey I'm looking at new countries to live in right now, if this reparations thing goes through.
12 posted on 03/29/2002 6:06:13 PM PST by MadRobotArtist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MadRobotArtist
There are no other countries. :-( Maybe one of those Survivor islands?

In my e-mail to my parent's I linked the GA distric map as proof. Once they get power they plan to keep it using any means necessary.

13 posted on 03/29/2002 6:12:08 PM PST by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I think I can get rich in a few years after college( I just have to be miserly) after that Im fleeing the country before the Iron Curtain closes.
14 posted on 03/29/2002 6:15:48 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Russia is inoculated against communism and has a 13% flat tax good natural resources lots of room to grow Putin will live a long time Russia looks good to me.
15 posted on 03/29/2002 6:19:54 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Everyone should flee the country at least once. I did it when Clinton was elected but it didn't last long and the break came fast. Sitting on a bench eating my 100th greasy kielbasa I said screw it, walked across the street to American Express and bought a ticket to Las Vegas.
16 posted on 03/29/2002 6:27:14 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I'm almost sure I could get American food in St Petersburg.
17 posted on 03/29/2002 6:29:03 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Sitting on a bench eating my 100th greasy kielbasa

I don't think Spring Break counts. ;-)

18 posted on 03/29/2002 6:29:32 PM PST by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I've been to Israel and to Lithuania. Actually I like Lithuania; you can take 30,000$ there and be a King. If they spoke English it'd be nicer though. :-(
19 posted on 03/29/2002 6:30:33 PM PST by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I hate foreign food( basically I hate everything that doesn't have lots of carbs I keep myself from becoming a fata** by basically fasting whenever I put on weight). Yeah if they don't have American food im pretty screwed.
20 posted on 03/29/2002 6:31:20 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson