Posted on 03/29/2002 2:03:40 PM PST by gc4nra
Political Editor Randy Shandobil for KTVU Channel 2 News
Target practice could soon get a lot more expensive. Next week a Bay Area state senator will formally propose a five-cent-a-bullet sales tax. Not five percent, but a nickel for each and every round.
Shoot a small caliber weapon, such as a .22? That more than doubles the price of your ammo.
Sen. Don Perata/(D) Oakland : "I will be attacked by those who hate gun control. I know that. As soon as this airs, I am going to start getting nasty phone calls and email."
Senator Don Perata is a gun control crusader. But he says his tax idea is not meant to deter gun use, but rather to raise money to save California's hospital trauma centers, some of which are going under.
"Bullets cause injuries that are expensive to treat and generally speaking, the public is footing the bill."
Perata wants the legislature to put the tax idea on the November ballot.
Peter Buxtun/NRA Member: "This idea is stupidity."
National Rifle Association member Peter Buxtun says previous gun control measures by Senator Perata put many gun dealers out of business, and he says a nickel a bullet tax would just lead to ammo smuggling. Buxtun: "People would go to Oregon, they would go to Nevada and they would load up the trunks of their car or their whole van and bring tons of ammunition in."
At the Jackson Arms Shooting Range in South San Francisco today, most customers did not want to talk on camera... but everyone said the tax would be unfair. They don't shoot people, they shoot targets.
Sen. Perata: "I am sorry. You cannot screen them out. The same way that someone with a perfect driving record is going to be upset that they pay an added cost for emergency care."
Democrats control both the state senate and the state assembly, so Senator Perata is confident a majority of lawmakers will support the tax. But that doesn't mean it will qualify for the November ballot.
For a ballot measure to qualify, two thirds of the legislature has to say yes, not a simple majority.
Buxtun: "We'll absolutely fight this as hard as we can."
If it does qualify, it could become a hot button issue in the Governor's race. Aides to Republican Bill Simon, who earns an A rating from the NRA, say he would be against it. Governor Davis is taking no position yet. He has signed many gun control bills, but says he's against tax hikes.
-- Political Editor Randy Shandobil, KTVU Channel 2 News
© 2002 KTVU-TV
Would you mind explaining what the hell you're babbling about?
Just make sure the ATF's bullets have the warnings.
Then they'll just come back for "round 2" and either raise the tax or base it as a percentage of the cost of the bullet. The tyrants will just keep pushing until they are finally told "no", one way or another.
Frederick Douglass summarized this situation well: Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.
The needs of a senator who is disarming the peasants for their own good are greater, so of course he must have a carry permit.
This tax would actually be dangerous! It would decrease safety because people will be less likely to practice at the range. We know that practice increases safety. People who don't practice may not be able to hit the intruder, or be uncomfortable with their guns. Also, ammunition becomes stale over time. While blowing off old rounds at the range is fine, you don't want to rely on them if you might need them.
Actually, it'll be harder to pass than you might think. Many of the Democrats represent the Central Valley which is becoming increasingly conservative. They will abstain or vote no -- or just won't be there, developing food poisoning that keeps them in the bathroom. The gun grabbing Republicans may oppose it because it's a tax.
If it passes, I don't think Davis will sign it. It will bring gunners to the polls. He'll sign it next year if he wins in November.
We HAVE to elect Bill Simon.
It would. The chemicals inside are designed to be reactive, both the primer and the powder, and they will react slowly if left to sit, just like photographic film that you should store in the fridge. Dynamite becomes unstable when it ages, and many modern powders have the same active ingredients. If someone hands me a box of old 45 ACP ammo, I will remove the bullet [sometimes it is welded in place due to corrosion, so it takes quite a bit of force to free], dump the powder, carefully remove the primer [which may be inert, but maybe not], clean the casing, and reload as usual. Look for signs of corrosion on the cartridge.
I predict that Davis will find a way to kill this idea.
If y'all are old enough to remember (I was just a snotty-nosed beer-drinking college kid.) There was a handgun ban on the 1982 ballot. That year, Republican George Deukmejian beat Democrat Tom Bradley in their race for governor by a mere 100,000 votes. That was one vote for precinct statewide. Does anyone think that gun owner turnout against the ballot measure had anything to do with it?
Does anyone think Davis and South are dumb enough to let this happen again? Let's hope so.
http://www.nrawinningteam.com/calnra/perata/perata3.gif
Perata, D-Oalkand, said he wants the money to pay for hospital trauma centers, some of which are facing budget problems. "There's no reason why the general public should be paying for gunshot victims. It is an avoidable injury. It is a preventable injury and therfore I think it's fair to fix a very small tax on the sale of bullets," Perata said.
Now, substitute "AIDS/anal intercourse" for "gunshot." As far as I'm concerned there's no reason the general public should be paying for AIDS if contracted through sodomy. It's an "avoidable, preventable" illness. Instead of worrying about bullets Perata should be imposing a "buggery tax" in the San Francisco-Oakland area.
I plan on reloading for my .308 this summer - mostly for my own enjoyment, but also in case idiots like Perata get their way.
Brass, powder and primers can be had in large quantities, but bullets would seem to be the hardest component to replenish. Would un-jacketed bullets be feasible in my bolt-gun? Or is there a way to mould AND jacket them? Any info you have would be very helpful!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.