Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A day in the life of President Bush (photos): 3/27/02
yahoo.com, whitehouse.gov | Republican Warrior Princess

Posted on 03/27/2002 4:57:55 PM PST by rintense

President Bush signed the controversial Campaign Finance Reform bill today as Mitch McConnell immediately filed suit against it. Bush later headed to South Carolina where he spoke to Emergency First Responders in Greenville. He also stopped in Atlanta, Georgia at the Georgia Tech Institute of Technology where he watched drills demostrating response to terror attacks. Enjoy your daily dose of Dubya!


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 521-531 next last
To: Miss Marple
That may be. But it is also true that on this issue there is a percentage of activist conservatives who actually, genuinely, passionately disagree with Bush. It may make you feel better to dismiss dissent on this as fictional or somehow ginned up by others, but it is real.

I see the political box Bush was in, and I see the political strategy on signing, but I disagree with his decision. I see it as an error, but I still enthusiastically support him -- because he's right on so much that is vital to America. Which is why I enjoy this thread. Still, it is counterproductive to deny disagreement. An accurate assessment of loss of support on this or that issue is necessary for future political analysis.

That said, I predict this issue will be supplanted by future events within a few weeks, as always happens in politics.

461 posted on 03/28/2002 11:17:50 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
I know there are people here who disagree with the President's positions on this. Some of my longest friends on this forum were upset. That is not what I am talking about.

I am talking about a large group of new posters who showed up just as the bill was to be signed.

Just like the bunch of new people that showed up when the China plane incident happened. Or stem cell.

Well, I think there are pepople upset about this, and I also think there are people who are gleefully PRETENDING to be upset. When I hear Mara Liason concerned about how conservatives are upset about this, I smell a Rat.

462 posted on 03/28/2002 11:21:15 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The problem with Miss Marple is anyone who has a disagreement with her is immediately labelled a "disrupter" or a "seminar caller." This type of ad hominem attack is really the reason we have 400 plus replies on this thread.
463 posted on 03/28/2002 11:22:12 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Of course there are opportunists, and no doubt some will attempt to exploit this for electoral purposes -- it was ever thus. Normal politics. But there's no percentage in confusing the behavior of such opportunists with the merits of the issue, which need to be debated. And as I said, ultimately this issue won't determine a single race.
464 posted on 03/28/2002 11:27:37 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
No. You are misrepresenting my words, and that is not what I said. Those who showed up to attack the President on this thread hijacked it for their own purposes. That IS disruptive, especially when we have had the minimum of 5 threads a day raking the President over the coals for this.

I have had discussions on plenty of other threads about this, and I am only concerned that now that this is a done deal, we CONTINUE to hear about it. Why? Want to start a primary challenge?

If you are unhappy about this, and I know you are, file it away as THE reason Bush should be replaced in 2004. Look for someone who would do a better job and campaign for that person.

465 posted on 03/28/2002 11:27:51 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Love ya.
466 posted on 03/28/2002 12:01:48 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher; Miss Marple
It's easy to understand, in cases like CFR, how people's passions truly surface. And I think it can be a good thing for some, bad for others. Passion is good, but when rationality and reason are sacrificed, everyone suffers. And that seems to have happend to some of FR.
467 posted on 03/28/2002 12:30:01 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Agreed. Also agree that the "Daily Dose" is NOT the place for the usual FR wars. Thanks for all you do.
468 posted on 03/28/2002 12:33:11 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
You know when it was first suggested that G.W. Bush would be running for President I was very much against it and said that if he does I would not vote for him, but I have since changed my mind and will definitely vote for him again in 2004.
He is my President

Ya know how it is sometimes when you are running through the posts, enjoying the different comments, just feeling so good that so many share your own thoughts and feelings about our President, his family, adminstration, etc. and then, suddenly, your eye catches a post that gives ya slight chill...a bump of just feeling great?

Your post did just that to me. I am so glad you share the feeling so many of us here do. He is my President, too.

469 posted on 03/28/2002 12:35:51 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
As I was just reviewing Miss M's and your conversation about CFR, Rush and our President, I had another thought about the signing of this CFR disaster.

Do you think it is possible that our President, knowing full well what Ken Starr will be doing regarding CFR (and the suit has already been filed-thank goodness-boy were they ever hot on that one), signed this bill by way of making the Republicans in the House and Senate take notice that if they go along with bad legislation for some political points down the road (ie elections) that they cannot COUNT on him to be 'DADDY' and do the right thing if they fail to do their jobs adequately. That President Bush is putting them on notice that if a bill gets to him as represented as the will of the people by elected reps and senators, that he will sign it even if it angers his own party? I dunno. He has sure made certain that the reps and senators of the republican persuasion that voted for CFR could very well end up paying consequences down the road for lack of backbone should the courts uphold the CFR bill as written. I dunno...if this scenario were in operation...but if it was, our President, imho, certainly took the risk with the right bill because it is laden with the stuff of illegality.

470 posted on 03/28/2002 12:46:14 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Republic
Although I doubt your question is sincere (with all the "our President" BS), I will state my analysis.

Bush delegates. Electoral politics he delegates to Rove. Bush trusts Rove, and does not have the time, energy or inclination to do the kind of district-by-district, legislation-by-legislation analysis required to run the political operation. Bush lays out the political goals, and his staff makes recommendations as to how to get there. Over years, he has come to deeply respect and trust Rove's advice. So on CFR, he followed Rove's advice. Politically, Rove is probably mostly correct as far as he went. This is the same political shop that destroyed the Democrat party in Texas, and you can see signs that this is working to some degree on a national scale. Ultimately I think this was a bad call because Rove has not seen that this decision reinforces the conservative template: "we elect them and then they betray us." A larger percentage than Rove calculates will lose/has lost heart. Conservatives are not a typical constituency group. Democrats can easily buy back constituency groups they've betrayed. Conservatives can't be bought. It will take far more time and effort for Rove to make amends than he realizes; and he will not ever be able to fully make amends. I do not believe the numbers of the disaffected will be enough to affect a single election. However, it is a political fault line that Rove will have to work around for the next seven years.

471 posted on 03/28/2002 12:58:17 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Republic
Apologies for doubting your sincerity. I misread this as from "Registered." MEA CULPA.
472 posted on 03/28/2002 1:00:02 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
Geeeeeeeez. That is pretty hard, Thatcher. Rove may have miscalculated, and the old backlash of 'read my lips' in another form is there alright. But the house and senate had plenty of time to kill that crappy bill. I don't think it is beneath a President, to sign a bill he knows will not pass consitutional scrutiny (we all know that), to deflect ammo from the dems, send a resounding wake-up call to the Republicans in the House and Senate to do the right thing next time and stop depending on vetos to save their bacon, and on a petty, really swwwwwwwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeet level ( in deference to my teenagers), deny McVain and his flying monkeys the chance to gloat in a major domo WH lawn photo-sp. I think President Bush played this one right. I don't think there will be major evacuations from the dedicated Republicans. I am going to enjoy watching this play out.
473 posted on 03/28/2002 1:09:29 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Fabulous!!!! Thank you!!! And could you, pretty please, add me to your bump list?
474 posted on 03/28/2002 1:21:14 PM PST by MaeWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Book still not here. Only two weeks more to go.
475 posted on 03/28/2002 1:33:20 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: jurisdog
Attention Lurkers: Please note how the anti-Bush people are rude and insulting!

As a long time, habitual, lurker at FR who mostly just speaks when spoken to, I hear the message loud and clear.

It seems that every topic I open today has one or more of these Johnny-one-notes complaining about CFR and their free speach. They have their free speach, but by saying the same things over and over, in every topic, ad nauseum, they are abusing it and imho, acting downright trollish!

I heard you the first ten times, do you understand? Or are you thick?

I've read the comments, the insults and the opinions. You haven't changed my mind about President Bush, nor will you. I support him and find the tactics to bash him rude and anoying. Any purpose there may be in the agenda, has been defeated by the total lack of manners and courtesy. Please have enough respect for lurkers and others to keep the opinions where they belong.

I never miss a Rintense "Day In The Life". There is almost always a quote. It's not an invitation for anyone to act like a creep. So, just stop! I also listen to Rush. It's his show, he can say what he likes, but if he brought it into "A Day In The Life" I'd be plenty peaved at him.

Where is that "ignore poster" button? We need it with some of these posts.
I second That!

476 posted on 03/28/2002 2:12:30 PM PST by Drumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Republic
the house and senate had plenty of time to kill that crappy bill

Actually, the White House actively discouraged the Republicans from killing it, both in the House and Senate.

477 posted on 03/28/2002 2:22:46 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher
I love how the non-thinking crowd at free republic always operates under the same MO.

If you post something negative that they don't like, instead of challening your post with a meaningful, substantive response, i.e. debating you intelligently, they will do the following:

1. Call you names
2. Call you a liar
3. Make insults
4. Point out your registration date
5. Theorize about the vast left-wing conspiracy to make posts on some obscure website in order to change the radio message of Rush Limbaugh who apparently doesn't think for himself. 6. etc.

I have had more attacks and insults against me on this forums than I have ever had anywhere in my life. As a life-long conservative, someone loyal to my party and the president, especially this president, I find it hard to believe that the majority of Freepers are a fair and accurate representation of the party at large. In all of the campaign fund raisers I've attended, in all of the campaigns I've worked on, among all the Republican legislators, govenors and presidents that I have met, I have never seen such arrogant, head-in-the-ground, mean-spirited people as I have here.
478 posted on 03/28/2002 2:39:21 PM PST by jurisdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: jurisdog
Some are like that. Most aren't.

You, I would characterize as flame bait.

479 posted on 03/28/2002 2:44:28 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: jurisdog;rintense;Miss Marple;marylina;homeschool mama;Howlin; all
I have never seen such arrogant, head-in-the-ground, mean-spirited people as I have here.

Then I can assume, doggie, that you won't be back here tonight? I mean really, why come some place where you're not wanted?

480 posted on 03/28/2002 2:49:47 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 521-531 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson