Posted on 03/27/2002 6:12:51 AM PST by Redcloak
The various media, government and special interest groups crucify the righteous. The centers of power. But, I'm reminded of the red/blue map.
I'll even wager that the ones who crucify still want to see righteousness. It is the essence of battle to them. It smells of death to them. And death is what they seek.
Roe V Wade was judicial activism which created a "new right"? The "abortion" you should be speaking about, repealed a REAL right. Huge difference, too bad you didn't understand it.
It's 29 years and counting. The ruling on this one should last at last this long. Bush has set it up to kill this crap for the equivalent of a geological era.
Nonsense, he is a coward and no attempts by apologists to explain his signing of it will wipe that away. The idea that he signed this as a way to kill it long term is idiotic beyond belief.
I'm sorry you didn't get the political equivalent of a suicidal banzai charge. That was what you were asking for.
It may well be that he just committed political suicide. I sure hope so. In any case, if you think it would be suicidal to defend the constitution you are delusional. Almost no citizens cared about this BS before,,,,,, but they will now.
The only "reform" which does not abridge freedom of speech and to petition is to restore government to its constitutional limits. We'll still have problems with paving and defense contractors, but it will be better than the entire electorate trying to vote its share of public largesse.
Seems like these people should have learned in Kindergarten that it's impossible to find anyone that they can agree with all the time.
You're not satisfied unless it's a political equivalent of a suicide charge. Sorry, but I learned from 1995. Maybe you need to learn that lesson, or your will do your principles more harm than good.
It hasn't. But they have established that they (the government) have the power to prevent people from exercizing thier right. They have currently set the time as 60 days and the frame as before an election. They can change that anytime they please if this stands. When it reaches 365 days, you will have lost it totally.
You bring a lot of credibility to this debate when you show up with the screen name of a Democrat.
This is my nomination for the dumbest thing anyone has said on this forum today, maybe ever.
Do you really want to trust nine black-robed bureaucrats with your freedom of speech?
It was dead before, your party and your President have joined with the other incumbents to bring it to life. It was dead, now it lives. Think
You're not satisfied unless it's a political equivalent of a suicide charge. Sorry, but I learned from 1995. Maybe you need to learn that lesson, or your will do your principles more harm than good.
I guess this means that you are repeating your idea that he signed it in order to kill it. One of the goofier ideas ever brought up. Ask him if that's why he did it. Totally inane.
This is my nomination for the dumbest thing anyone has said on this forum today, maybe ever.
Well I will grant he was a founding father but why a Democrat? Obviously your screen name would have been even dumber if it had been George McGovern or FDR but Thomas Jefferson was an early member of the Democratic party, the party of Gore, Clinton, Dukakis, Johnson, and Kennedy. But since you are not a Republican you could care less. What .0005% party do you belong to?
This is flatly incorrect. I don't have the facts or quotes handly, but he outspokenly and forcefully stated he would veto McCain-Feingold.
It is not 60 days before an election.
That is because Rush -- unlike Bush -- is a conservative.
And is this a gamble? Look at Congressman Billybob's posts on this issue. This thing is very likely to be tossed out, according to him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.