Replies

Look, killing it off for three or four decades is better than three or four years.

It was dead before, your party and your President have joined with the other incumbents to bring it to life. It was dead, now it lives. Think

You're not satisfied unless it's a political equivalent of a suicide charge. Sorry, but I learned from 1995. Maybe you need to learn that lesson, or your will do your principles more harm than good.

I guess this means that you are repeating your idea that he signed it in order to kill it. One of the goofier ideas ever brought up. Ask him if that's why he did it. Totally inane.

Then, I suppose that you wouldn't have a deliberate safety for field position at the END of the game.

You'd be happier with Hillary in the White House and losing everything you stand for, than to have Bush in, and get 70% of what you stand for. That's the impression I get. Sorry, but your way was tried - it was a loser in the 1995 budget battle. We cannot attack these guys with the frontal attack. It STINKS as strategy.

The Supreme Court cannot give advisory opinions or say how it will rule on pending legislation. You have to have a law to do this. You'll note there was no signing ceremony. I've pinged him on this reply, as well. There ain't no glory for McCain, and I'll bet that there is only going to be a pro forma defense of this thing by DOJ. It's gonna be killed anyhow.

My problem with your attitude on this is the fact that I do not think you are are thinking it through. Go ahead, go third party, elect Hillary as a result, lose everything you stand for, and I hope those chains are light. Because you didn't THINK, we could lose it all.