Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
The key factor here, which the librarians deliberately miss, and the AP writer may have "accidentally" missed, is this: The federal government is NOT telling any library that it MUST put in the blocking software to stop porn.

What the government is saying is, "If you want to receive moeny from us, you must do this." Any library that wants to receive porn on its Internet servers is perfectly free to refuse the money and do business as usual.

The fatal flaw in this arguement is exactly the same as the "lady" who got nude and covered herself in chocolate and said it was "censorship" if the government didn't give her a grant for her "artistic endeavors."

Anybody has a constitutional right to create whatever they call "art." Nobody has a constitutional right to receive taxpayers' money to support that art.

With the librarians, it is one step worse. What they are defending is not merely offensive and stupid, it is also illegal, They might as well say, it offends the Constitution not to allow our patrons to bring guns into the libraries.

Oops, I forgot. These are lefties. I don't suppose they will make that last argument.

Congressman Billybob

Click here to fight Shays-Meehan.

Click here for latest column: "Does Anybody READ the Constitution?"

12 posted on 03/25/2002 9:28:47 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
The fatal flaw in this arguement is exactly the same as the "lady" who got nude and covered herself in chocolate and said it was "censorship" if the government didn't give her a grant for her "artistic endeavors."

Yep. And it's the standard way the government operates.

They don't tell the states they must enact seatbelt laws, they just say that if you don't do so, we won't give you Federal highway money. Ditto for blood alcohol level rules.

15 posted on 03/25/2002 9:31:19 AM PST by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
It is equal to the government saying "keep your clothers on in public". That's all.

Where are these people when our political speech is being restricted? It isn't about the Constitution for them. It's about a liberal political agenda.

23 posted on 03/25/2002 9:35:16 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
Anybody has a constitutional right to create whatever they call "art." Nobody has a constitutional right to receive taxpayers' money to support that art

That needed repeating...

56 posted on 03/25/2002 11:04:00 AM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
I couldn't have said it better.
78 posted on 03/25/2002 5:11:09 PM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
What the government is saying is, "If you want to receive moeny from us, you must do this."

In other words, extortion.

---max

99 posted on 03/27/2002 4:18:15 AM PST by max61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson