Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Academy Award time: What's the most liberal movie of all time?

Posted on 03/23/2002 8:22:39 PM PST by cincinnati65

Which movie (past or present) embodies the most liberal message?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-351 next last
To: cincinnati65
I think "Born on the Fourth of July" deserves an honorable mention.

In the Sci-Fi category Waterworld was a total plot capitulation to the eco-weenies.

"Same Time Next Year" was liberal and it SUCKED SUCKED SUCKED!! I've despised Alan Alda ever since after seeing this swill.

221 posted on 03/24/2002 5:10:59 AM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Oh yeah, "Arlington Road", there's another Tim Robbins special. One I haven't seen mentioned is his "Bob Roberts", where he plays a Republican candidate who is, shock of shocks, crooked and slimy!

And no mention of comrade Oliver Stone? The all-time champ for psychotic liberal lunacy HAS to be "JFK". Nothing else is close. Except for his "Salvador","Talk Radio", "Wall Street", "Nixon", "Born on the Fourth of July","Natural Born Killers". And his next movie is about Castro. Can't wait.

222 posted on 03/24/2002 5:14:22 AM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: All
The movies liberals most like to watch over and over?...I 'd guess anything recommended by Candyman.com.
223 posted on 03/24/2002 5:27:15 AM PST by X918
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: X918
Thelma & Louise ?

I haven't seen it, but the fawning reviews convinced me.

224 posted on 03/24/2002 5:53:00 AM PST by muleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
"Same Time Next Year" was liberal ...

I thougth it was an okay movie, but yes, I noticed that it sounded several liberal themes......adultery's okay (we're just following our "star"), people change, change is "growth" is good, yada yada, real slop. But that was an overall atmosphere, and I didn't have the impression that it laid the markers down like some of the classics, like Seven Days in May or Spartacus, which someone else mentioned and which I think was ghost-written by the Communist Dalton Trumbo, though I'd need to check that. I've read recently that the Spartacus story has been a classic Communist roorback, altered to serve them as an agitprop vehicle -- hence its cooptation for a screenplay.

Oh, and major oversight on my part -- Easy Rider. Some of those soliloquies are pure New Left "Barbra Streisand". Nicholson's drivel about "this used to be a great country" -- like it isn't -- was pure Lefty ipecac.

225 posted on 03/24/2002 5:53:40 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
Who's seen Soylent Green?
226 posted on 03/24/2002 6:03:05 AM PST by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Most Liberal movie of the past six months: John Q.

I have not seen that movie, but a co-worker of mine did, and I would say is your typically non-politically involved or barely even cognizant (of politics) person.  Twice I heard her discuss it, and each time her comment was that it really said a lot about the state of our health care system.

227 posted on 03/24/2002 6:05:44 AM PST by Texas Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Great minds think alike. I was gonna say "The China Syndrome" too.
228 posted on 03/24/2002 6:12:50 AM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Checked your Freeper homepage.....did you know Sulla had a large port-wine birthmark? The Emperor Claudius did, too -- his is thought to have been from lead poisoning of his mother, Antonia Minor, while he was in utero, since he also had nerve damage on one side of his face, which caused him to drool endlessly, very unfortunately.

Sulla had a hot temper, also a sign of lead damage (one of the Valentinian emperors is supposed to be a classic case, with terrific mood swings like Hitler's, that actually interfered with his ability to discharge his office), and he died in 78 B.C. when he suffered a stroke while indulging an outburst of anger at a pedlar.

His basic problem, very interestingly for your choice of handles, was something well out of his hands, and which has rough parallels with today. The society he inherited was concentrating financial resources in fewer hands, and a great deal of wealth was being plowed back into real estate, transforming the countryside from a productive breadbasket teeming with yeoman farmers (smallholders typically worked a couple of acres for subsistence) to a more productive agribusiness landscape dedicated to cash crops and agricultural "factories" peopled with hired hands and villani (slaves), which is what the old farms gradually became -- the ones that survived, around which the other holdings were consolidated. By the time of the Severi, Italy and Sicily were very much given over to wide olive and wine plantations (latifundia; the Spanish also used the term in the New World to refer to land-grant plantations and their owners). All this concentration, beginning in the time of the Gracchi and already at crisis levels by the time Sulla came of age, was driving hordes of freeholders off the land: their sons into the legions, and the fathers into the cities, to become the Roman Mob. And they weren't about to solve their social problem, because the engine of their social stresses was a money machine in the hands of the upper classes of Roman society, whose maintenance of ancient power and precedence Sulla championed against the adventurism of dispossessed nobles acting with and through the Plebs and its mob politics.

229 posted on 03/24/2002 6:13:34 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
I've seen Soylent Green. It isn't antiutopian so much as dystopian, but a lot of the minatory themes have an antiutopian feel to them.

The Soylent Corporation is supposed to be the malefic actor, but then it's just responding (in the film) to Malthusian population pressures: so who's the bad guy now? People who don't practice birth control? Hairton Cheston plays a policeman, whose High Noon-ish confrontation of the bad guy is softened by giving the cop an antiheroic personality. (He pilfers, he steals, he appropriates.) Interesting film, I would agree most of the values lean to the Left, but the cop as the last honest man, trying to Do Right, is pretty conservative, as is the rejection of dry-eyed utilitarianism and Mass Society models. Tough call. Any comments?

230 posted on 03/24/2002 6:23:55 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Your mention of Waterworld has some merit. I liked the vilification of the bad guys as "the Smokers" (oooooo-booga-booga-booga!!!!); I had to laugh at the cliche'. And the identification of the tanker at the end as the Exxon Valdez was a knee-slapper -- of course!

It was certainly self-serious, pretentious, and portentous enough......it certainly caught the spirit of liberalism, didn't it?

231 posted on 03/24/2002 6:33:27 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
The only liberal idea in Chocolat was the mayor using his power of office against a small business.
232 posted on 03/24/2002 6:46:05 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
To the very worthy list I add Inherit the Wind for its portrayal of conservative believers of Biblical authority as backwater clodhoppers incapable of independent thought. ITW continues to influence as it is in heavy rotation on TCM, the stage version is produced in high schools and community theaters across the country, and the book is included in many English classes.

The ripple effect of undermining Biblical authority and its believers is evident today throughout society by our moral decline and socialist drift. ITW blindsided the Christian church in America which has yet to respond in any meaningful way on the scale ITW influences. The damage has been devestating and the church has yet to recover.

233 posted on 03/24/2002 6:50:19 AM PST by Ligeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diefree
Re: Song of Russia

The movie has to be taken in historical context. It was, as I recall, about brave Russians fighting the Nazis during WWII; just as War and Peace was about the Russians fighting against Napoleon.

234 posted on 03/24/2002 6:50:26 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus
If nobody was in the room with Kane when he died (Nurse was clearly in another room.), who hear him mumble "Rosebud"?
235 posted on 03/24/2002 6:51:24 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Triumph of the Will is still effective. I went to a showing several years ago and heard people commenting that "Films like these should be banned." I commented that the film was already working on them.
236 posted on 03/24/2002 6:53:08 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: diefree
John Wayne hated High Noon.

Probably because Gary Cooper was in it instead of him.

237 posted on 03/24/2002 6:56:38 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Hunter
I think the film you are talking about was Agnes of God.
238 posted on 03/24/2002 7:05:39 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Post # 236: Great observation, Sto. Good for you!

Kinda reminds ya' of the Liberals who shout down speakers whose opinions they don't like--and on college campuses! And all the relentless Liberal propaganda that barrages everyone constantly--over TV, in the movies, in the newspapers, everywhere--and reduces large segments of the population to mind-numbed robots.

Yeah, Triumph of the Will is a masterpiece of the Liberal agenda.

239 posted on 03/24/2002 7:24:09 AM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: reg45;all
I nominate MUHAMMAD ALI.

Never before has a movie galvanized liberals and anti American haters so tightly. To make it worse many conservatives also love it due to the respect for his athletic ability and love for sports.

Ali is lauded as the social and polical icon standing up to the Anti-American movement in the 60s. It gives the liberal media open season on loving what he did (forget the boxing), Ali actually calls US policy "baby killing and killing other poor people".

The clincher for me is Bryant Gumble (who never misses an opportunity to turn a benign situation into a racial one),,,,,,Bumble states, "When Ali lost, I cried. We all cried - those of us who were fighting for what was right."

240 posted on 03/24/2002 7:24:47 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson